Ok who's responsible for this?
I'm dying!
I guess it's too late to put forward a motion to play this at the AGM?
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
I guess it's too late to put forward a motion to play this at the AGM?
BRICK
Regular
Ok who's responsible for this?
I'm dying!
Release the hounds Gina....
These guys will be a laughing stock by the time they walk into the AGM
Xerof
Biding my Time 1971
https://ecourts.justice.wa.gov.au/e...ision?id=0b5d35d3-7502-4936-8802-a766bfb75912
So, as expected, AVZ lost the case to withhold email addresses of shareholders, as above
Of interest though was that only 28% of shareholders provide their email addresses, so in a sense, a pyrrhic victory.
When we inevitably get an email from MMGA, I suggest a return reply attaching the Youtube video prepared by MMGA SCAM ALERT
https://x.com/MMGASCAMALERT/status/1717507650320257133?s=20
So, as expected, AVZ lost the case to withhold email addresses of shareholders, as above
Of interest though was that only 28% of shareholders provide their email addresses, so in a sense, a pyrrhic victory.
When we inevitably get an email from MMGA, I suggest a return reply attaching the Youtube video prepared by MMGA SCAM ALERT
https://x.com/MMGASCAMALERT/status/1717507650320257133?s=20
Lol some other fake Elon musk did
Carlos Danger
Top 20
I've never really seen a big deal about the share holders getting emails from MMGA. Anyone not engaged enough to care probably doesn't have a meaningful number of votes. My friends who own AVZ after hearing about it from me all own sub 10k shares and wouldn't know your Zijin from your Green Lady.
I'd say TSE alone would outvote the sum total of those reached by email/post.
Scoota30
Regular
I don't believe that the company can see a live vote tally/score which is also why there has been ring around, at the end of my call they asked if I had already voted, and if so, was it in line with the board recommendations. So they are trying to roughly gauge the outcome.
My understanding is that the voting is controlled by automic/the share registry so that it is managed by a third party so there's no risk of companies fixing votes on their own to benefit themselves.
Happy to be corrected.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
Yeah shareholders that provided an email address are far more likely to be actively engaged in following the stock and will have probably made a decision one way or another by now anyway. Only 28% of holders have provided email but I'd say most of them are from the over 10k shares group. I guess it's cheaper and allows instant communication in the lead up to the AGM but I doubt it will go far to change many peoples votes. Sad.
This needs to be explored more.
Hodlandwin69
Regular
Realistically, what's % of votes do you reckon Fat Tail will get. I'm thinking a 40-60 split if those that voted in favour of No
DiscoDanNZ
Regular
I'm guessing they get 2.5% / 80 odd mil automatically from Bellamel -> Norton -> Zijin. I wonder if they removed that contact from the courtesy ring around, would be a hilarious conversation between the AVZ call center rep and the Bellamel receptionist.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
marksmann007
Regular
I was thinking along the same lines.
Investors who don’t actively follow the going’s on of a company probably don’t usually bother to cast a vote anyway.
DiscoDanNZ
Regular
In that case I hope the door hit them in the arse on the way out. I bet they wish they had those votes now though, surprised they haven't done a dodgy deal with Cominiere to get them back for 10% of what they were worth.
antimatter
Regular
I assume that if Shareholders do not vote, their holding will be counted as abstain? Can anyone confirm?
Similar threads
