AVZ Discussion 2022

[Doc]

No announcement from the company today

I'm certainly up for one by tomorrow with all the shit that seems to have happended since late last week

you were saying?

Not much on one but still.....

 

[Retrobyte]

https://avzminerals.com.au/investor-centre/2023/10/23/media-release-response-to-fat-tail-strategy

 

[Retrobyte]

PDF here

 

[JNRB]

you were saying?

Not much on one but still.....

View attachment 47807

doesn't fill me with confidence this media release....
I guess it show's we're getting closer to resolution but it's hard to be enthusiatic when you've got lines like this

 

[Retrobyte]

 

[Doc]

So AVZ are saying that not only is this MMGA utter crap, in fact they are hurting us on the ground and delaying progress.
Honestly, the 3 stooges can fuck right off. Does someone nominating for BoD have to be present an a AGM? I might just have to make the trip over

 

[Carlos Danger]

you were saying?

Not much on one but still.....

View attachment 47807

https://avzminerals.com.au/investor-centre/2023/10/23/media-release-response-to-fat-tail-strategy

PDF here

 

[Winenut]

you were saying?

Not much on one but still.....

View attachment 47807

When Nut ups the pressure on the board .....they deliver...

 

[Hudnut]

So we are in the middle of finalising a compromise while holding the whip hand in legal cases, and Arseholes 1, 2 and 3 go to the DRC and tell them they will give them a better deal if they get control of AVZ, basically claiming they will be representing AVZ soon.

This is delaying MOU finalisation.

Bastards.

 

[Chilla]

Fat Tail nominees should be disqualified from the board election process for dishonesty in the application, being of character that will bring disrepute to the company and having relations to adversaries that are causing harm and financial impact to AVZ.

 

[Hudnut]

Do the Director nominees have to turn up to the AGM too?

Do they still sell lead pipe in Perth? Even galvo would do.

 

[Retrobyte]

Fat Tail nominees should be disqualified from the board election process for dishonesty in the application, being of character that will bring disrepute to the company and having relations to adversaries that are causing harm and financial impact to AVZ.

Given they refused to answer the very specific question about conflict of interest they should be disqualified. Maybe that's still to come

 

[Cumquat Cap]

I think it's crucial we all write to asx and FIRB if you have the spare time, there's a discernible conflict of interest with these Director's and the more pressure and light is shone, the better. Fuck these MMGA scumbags, dangling carrots to delay shareholders progress. What a sick joke

 

[Cumquat Cap]

Also, whomever procured photo evidence of them all sitting in Cong's Hotel - you are a fkn STAR - we greatly appreciate the work

 

[Carlos Danger]

doesn't fill me with confidence this media release....
I guess it show's we're getting closer to resolution but it's hard to be enthusiatic when you've got lines like this
View attachment 47809

Me thinks a deal has been reluctantly struck by Nigel

 

[cruiser51]

When Nut ups the pressure on the board .....they deliver...

Grab um by the nuts

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

I guess it show's we're getting closer to resolution but it's hard to be enthusiatic when you've got lines like this
View attachment 47809

That caught my eye too. It could be as simple as AVZ agreeing NOT to pursue financial remedies for administrative malfeasance as stipulated by law or JV agreement.
I think we just let this go and see what it looks like when announced.

 

[Scoota30]

So AVZ are saying that not only is this MMGA utter crap, in fact they are hurting us on the ground and delaying progress.
Honestly, the 3 stooges can fuck right off. Does someone nominating for BoD have to be present an a AGM? I might just have to make the trip over

I don't think these fucktards ever had intent of showing up at the AGM, as they know they won't get voted in. The whole game plan is to undermine our current in country efforts and delay the finalization of the MoU and that sounds like exactly what they've done.

If there's ever a time for Australian law and order to do what it's designed for, it's now to hold these stooges accountable. Completely Unaustralian and you have to wonder what the board and shareholders of the other ASX companies they are all involved in think about their actions.

 

[BRICK]

That caught my eye too. It could be as simple as AVZ agreeing NOT to pursue financial remedies for administrative malfeasance as stipulated by law or JV agreement.
I think we just let this go and see what it looks like when announced.

Compromise of legal rights but not compromise of mining rights?

 

[Hudnut]

Compromise of legal rights but not compromise of mining rights?

That could be anything, from giving up part of a tenement, paying a bit extra, increase of DRC ownership, to not claiming damages due to delay.

One thing is for sure. The MMGA kunts have offered more a chucked a spanner in the works.

I'd be surprised if the DRC doesn't wait until at least the AGM to see if they get in now before agreeing to anything.