AVZ Discussion 2022

Doc

Master of Quan
Don't "need" 9 but I think the constitution states there can be a "maximum" of 9

The board has certainly operated with less than 9 to this point and may still operate with less than 9 after the AGM depending on whether additional nominees actually get the required votes or not
Lets vote to change the Constitution then....
 

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Lets vote to change the Constitution then....
No need I don't think

I presume when a company is smaller it may only require a very small number of directors

As a company grows it will most likely look to add additional exertise to the board as a reflection of it's business needs

The AVZ constitution simply stipulates 9 as the maximum number of directors allowed

It can and has operated with less to this point and can still into the future

The shareholders get to vote on whether directors get appointed or not
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
A big smile spread across my face.
So shorters have been bailing out?

Bit of a peak in April at 4.2% or approx 148m shares

Now sitting at around 3.34% or approx 118m shares
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Doc

Master of Quan
No need I don't think

I presume when a company is smaller it may only require a very small number of directors

As a company grows it will most likely look to add additional exertise to the board as a reflection of it's business needs

The AVZ constitution simply stipulates 9 as the maximum number of directors allowed

It can and has operated with less to this point and can still into the future

The shareholders get to vote on whether directors get appointed or not
Was kidding, thought with the recent vote people would shout me down for proposing a vote lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

BEISHA

Top 20
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Was kidding, thought with the recent vote people would shout me down for proposing a vote lol
Ha ha!

Apologies ...I'm clearly taking myself too seriously!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

TDITD

Top 20
So shorters have been bailing out?

Bit of a peak in April at 4.2% or approx 148m shares

Now sitting at around 3.34% or approx 118m shares
I'm more pleased with the huge number still in suffering. No doubt linked to the Chinese $$ behind MMGA
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9 users

Azzler

Top 20
So shorters have been bailing out?

Bit of a peak in April at 4.2% or approx 148m shares

Now sitting at around 3.34% or approx 118m shares
Anyone remember how many shares were bought in when we got ASX 200? Because they also shorted just as many.
 
  • Thinking
Reactions: 2 users
Anyone remember how many shares were bought in when we got ASX 200? Because they also shorted just as many.
There was around 230m shares bought in the post trade auction on rebalance day. Not all of them were ASX200/300 buys but most would have been. Some would have been added later too. That big spike in the shorts was at the same time so would have been mostly instos hedging. I reckon a good chunk of the 30m closed short positions have just been firms returning shares they lent themselves for the hedge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users

TDITD

Top 20
Anyone remember how many shares were bought in when we got ASX 200? Because they also shorted just as many.
There was around 230m shares bought in the post trade auction on rebalance day. Not all of them were ASX200/300 buys but most would have been. Some would have been added later too. That big spike in the shorts was at the same time so would have been mostly instos hedging. I reckon a good chunk of the 30m closed short positions have just been firms returning shares they lent themselves for the hedge.
Yep March ASX 200 rebalancing. I'm hoping that second kick up in the shorts is our Chinese pals 🙏
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Yep March ASX 200 rebalancing. I'm hoping that second kick up in the shorts is our Chinese pals 🙏
Yup, No Pain, No Gain as they say. ;)🖕🖕🖕
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Xerof

Biding my Time 1971
There was around 230m shares bought in the post trade auction on rebalance day. Not all of them were ASX200/300 buys but most would have been. Some would have been added later too. That big spike in the shorts was at the same time so would have been mostly instos hedging. I reckon a good chunk of the 30m closed short positions have just been firms returning shares they lent themselves for the hedge.
I think it was near to 90/95mill shorts were put on, on entry to ASX200 The chart seems to confirm that
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Nbaz

Regular
So my question to everyone is. What happens if the MMGA get up on election day? What happens after that? Surely 3 new board members can't outweigh the rest. The reason I ask is because of this sinking feeling I have that this has all been a plan and the likes of CATH, lithium plus, hayyou(whatever) and yibin tiyani have all been planning to join forces to take over.
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
So my question to everyone is. What happens if the MMGA get up on election day? What happens after that? Surely 3 new board members can't outweigh the rest. The reason I ask is because of this sinking feeling I have that this has all been a plan and the likes of CATH, lithium plus, hayyou(whatever) and yibin tiyani have all been planning to join forces to take over.

The real issue is if even 1 MMGA crook gets a seat on the board they will be privy to information that will then go DIRECTLY back to their shadowy Chinese masters

THAT in my opinion is the biggest issue

Sure they might get voted down in a decision at board level (if they make it on) but it's the information they would use and pass onto external parties that would be like an absolute cancer to AVZ that is of major oncern
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

Nbaz

Regular
The real issue is if even 1 MMGA crook gets a seat on the board they will be privy to information that will then go DIRECTLY back to their shadowy Chinese masters

THAT in my opinion is the biggest issue

Sure they might get voted down in a decision at board level (if they make it on) but it's the information they would use and pass onto external parties that would be like an absolute cancer to AVZ that is of major oncern
But would that stop AVZ moving forward? Provided the icc and everything works out and this MOU comes out and the government gives us the mining permit. It shouldn't really matter what inside info they are giving out, all the info will be about building the plant and mining I would think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
But would that stop AVZ moving forward? Provided the icc and everything works out and this MOU comes out and the government gives us the mining permit. It shouldn't really matter what inside info they are giving out, all the info will be about building the plant and mining I would think.

Season 4 Troll GIF by Living Single
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
But would that stop AVZ moving forward? Provided the icc and everything works out and this MOU comes out and the government gives us the mining permit. It shouldn't really matter what inside info they are giving out, all the info will be about building the plant and mining I would think.
Might not stop AVZ moving forward but if you think those MMGA pricks and their Chinese backers are making life hard now imagine the extent of absolute shitfuckery they could come up with and execute when they have an insider giving them all the info on AVZ's operations and intentions and plans

Zijin, Cong, MMGA, Math, Eckhof, Celestin and others will never ever ever stop trying to fuck over AVZ for their own personal benefit.....ever
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
  • Fire
Reactions: 1 users

Nbaz

Regular
No troll here mate. I'm rusted on AVZ fan. Got a lot of shares riding in this and just getting a little stress that's all. No harm in thinking about every angle. I mean shit, who thought we'd be here when we bought in years and years ago?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
Top Bottom