As I said before our BoD are not stupid and the best advice to give some of the schoolboys here is leave them to do their job.
Last edited:
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
MoneyBags1348
Top 20
Looks like someone has Tommy on a leash finally.
"Last February, The Australian Financial Review reported that AVZ’s chief executive, Nigel Ferguson, authorised the $US1 million payment in June 2022 to businessman and consultant, Marius Mihigo, to help it obtain a mining licence.
“There was a $US1 million payment,” said Mr Huljich. “I voiced very severe concerns about that and I was of the view it wasn’t right for the company and then I was presented with a section 249d notice, which made an allegation I was conflicted. So, I resigned to prevent division on the board and a fight among shareholders, as I didn’t consider that in the best interests of the company.”
Huljich makes it sound like he fell on his sword. Trying to make himself out as an honorable man
And Huljich doesn’t mention the millions of shares he’s been offered by the Chinese behind him trying to roll the BOD
The lowest of lowlifes scum have really made themselves known with this MMGA strategy and their little turd mate
Not too mention that short seller boatman
…. What’s his name again, I’ll look it up and edit it in
By the way, that’s not me who gave @geo_au the ‘like’ for his comment…. I might get frustrated and tell people what I think of them from time to time, but I’ll generally name who I’m referring to and don’t feel the need to back up someone else calling people stupid
Just so you know @geo_au don’t include me when you are calling people names
Last edited:
Dear Peter does like playing with his doodah, probably the reason why he keeps on forgetting his exact birthday.Looks like someone has Tommy on a leash finally.
"Last February, The Australian Financial Review reported that AVZ’s chief executive, Nigel Ferguson, authorised the $US1 million payment in June 2022 to businessman and consultant, Marius Mihigo, to help it obtain a mining licence.
“There was a $US1 million payment,” said Mr Huljich. “I voiced very severe concerns about that and I was of the view it wasn’t right for the company and then I was presented with a section 249d notice, which made an allegation I was conflicted. So, I resigned to prevent division on the board and a fight among shareholders, as I didn’t consider that in the best interests of the company.”
Huljich makes it sound like he fell on his sword. Trying to make himself out as an honorable man
Who would trust that thief with your money??
And Tommy??????
He contacted the company for comments, ffs the idiot has a block of concrete in front of that empty criminal head, that is painfully obvious.
The company probably would have liked to say seeya in court wanker.
Fuk Zijin and cohorts
Huljich is never going to give a balanced view, that's the job of a professional journalist. AFR provides a very poor example of journalistic integrity. When will AVZ get the right to respond?
Edit: Agreed - hopefully in a court with a multi million dollar law suit against AFR
Edit: Agreed - hopefully in a court with a multi million dollar law suit against AFR
Last edited:
Avz did not provide comment.
Something, something Roberts, can't be bothered looking it up, a fucking stain on that family name.
Don't wanna be arrogant.
Once we get favourable ruling from ICC, i'll print custom triple-ply with the verdict embossed on every sheet,
Winenut
Go AVZ!
Cash for comment?
He's really cooked himself
Get him another shovel......he's digging a BIG fucking hole
“There was a $US1 million payment,” said Mr Huljich. “I voiced very severe concerns about that and I was of the view it wasn’t right for the company and then I was presented with a section 249d notice, which made an allegation I was conflicted. So, I resigned to prevent division on the board and a fight among shareholders, as I didn’t consider that in the best interests of the company.”
Begs the question if he didn’t consider that in the best interest of the company then, why would he think it’s in the best interest of AVZ now.
Plenty of division on the board and fighting among shareholders is exactly where this is heading if mmga have their way.
Begs the question if he didn’t consider that in the best interest of the company then, why would he think it’s in the best interest of AVZ now.
Plenty of division on the board and fighting among shareholders is exactly where this is heading if mmga have their way.
Lets vote to change the Constitution then....
Winenut
Go AVZ!
No need I don't think
I presume when a company is smaller it may only require a very small number of directors
As a company grows it will most likely look to add additional exertise to the board as a reflection of it's business needs
The AVZ constitution simply stipulates 9 as the maximum number of directors allowed
It can and has operated with less to this point and can still into the future
The shareholders get to vote on whether directors get appointed or not
TDITD
Top 20
A big smile spread across my face.
Winenut
Go AVZ!
So shorters have been bailing out?
Bit of a peak in April at 4.2% or approx 148m shares
Now sitting at around 3.34% or approx 118m shares
Was kidding, thought with the recent vote people would shout me down for proposing a vote lol
No need to state it, your ugly avatar says it all....
Similar threads
