AVZ Discussion 2022

GuruDukun

Regular
Huljich is never going to give a balanced view, that's the job of a professional journalist. AFR provides a very poor example of journalistic integrity. When will AVZ get the right to respond?
Avz did not provide comment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

cruiser51

Top 20
And Huljich doesn’t mention the millions of shares he’s been offered by the Chinese behind him trying to roll the BOD

The lowest of lowlifes scum have really made themselves known with this MMGA strategy and their little turd mate

Not too mention that short seller boatman
…. What’s his name again, I’ll look it up and edit it in

By the way, that’s not me who gave @geo_au the ‘like’ for his comment…. I might get frustrated and tell people what I think of them from time to time, but I’ll generally name who I’m referring to and don’t feel the need to back up someone else calling people stupid

Just so you know @geo_au don’t include me when you are calling people names
Something, something Roberts, can't be bothered looking it up, a fucking stain on that family name.

Don't wanna be arrogant. 😂😂😂😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

BEISHA

Top 20
Once we get favourable ruling from ICC, i'll print custom triple-ply with the verdict embossed on every sheet, and maybe a tommy the twat meme face on every second sheet.

pre-orders are open now for those also looking to upgrade their toilet paper.
Once we get favourable ruling from ICC, i'll print custom triple-ply with the verdict embossed on every sheet,

toilet-paper-shortage-the-office.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users

TLH

Regular
Anyone ever seen Tommy or Peter around?
Is there an award for the opposite of Australian of the year?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 9 users

BRICK

Top 20
Old tommy the tit better be careful about which side he comes out of this on if everythign is resolved for us.

Gonna look pretty fucking bad for him in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users

Azzler

Top 20


I'm truely shocked at this vile piece of garbage Tommy, using his position as a journalist, he's now literally advertising for MMGA.
Using their marketing lingo and angle.

What the actual fuck!?!
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Wow
Reactions: 30 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!


I'm truely shocked at this vile piece of garbage Tommy, using his position as a journalist, he's now literally advertising for MMGA.
Using their marketing lingo and angle.

What the actual fuck!?!


Cash for comment?

He's really cooked himself

Get him another shovel......he's digging a BIG fucking hole
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Bonsoir

Regular
“There was a $US1 million payment,” said Mr Huljich. “I voiced very severe concerns about that and I was of the view it wasn’t right for the company and then I was presented with a section 249d notice, which made an allegation I was conflicted. So, I resigned to prevent division on the board and a fight among shareholders, as I didn’t consider that in the best interests of the company.”

Begs the question if he didn’t consider that in the best interest of the company then, why would he think it’s in the best interest of AVZ now.

Plenty of division on the board and fighting among shareholders is exactly where this is heading if mmga have their way.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

SilentOne

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 17 users

Doc

Master of Quan
Don't "need" 9 but I think the constitution states there can be a "maximum" of 9

The board has certainly operated with less than 9 to this point and may still operate with less than 9 after the AGM depending on whether additional nominees actually get the required votes or not
Lets vote to change the Constitution then....
 

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Lets vote to change the Constitution then....
No need I don't think

I presume when a company is smaller it may only require a very small number of directors

As a company grows it will most likely look to add additional exertise to the board as a reflection of it's business needs

The AVZ constitution simply stipulates 9 as the maximum number of directors allowed

It can and has operated with less to this point and can still into the future

The shareholders get to vote on whether directors get appointed or not
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
A big smile spread across my face.
So shorters have been bailing out?

Bit of a peak in April at 4.2% or approx 148m shares

Now sitting at around 3.34% or approx 118m shares
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Doc

Master of Quan
No need I don't think

I presume when a company is smaller it may only require a very small number of directors

As a company grows it will most likely look to add additional exertise to the board as a reflection of it's business needs

The AVZ constitution simply stipulates 9 as the maximum number of directors allowed

It can and has operated with less to this point and can still into the future

The shareholders get to vote on whether directors get appointed or not
Was kidding, thought with the recent vote people would shout me down for proposing a vote lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

BEISHA

Top 20
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Was kidding, thought with the recent vote people would shout me down for proposing a vote lol
Ha ha!

Apologies ...I'm clearly taking myself too seriously!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

TDITD

Top 20
So shorters have been bailing out?

Bit of a peak in April at 4.2% or approx 148m shares

Now sitting at around 3.34% or approx 118m shares
I'm more pleased with the huge number still in suffering. No doubt linked to the Chinese $$ behind MMGA
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9 users

Azzler

Top 20
So shorters have been bailing out?

Bit of a peak in April at 4.2% or approx 148m shares

Now sitting at around 3.34% or approx 118m shares
Anyone remember how many shares were bought in when we got ASX 200? Because they also shorted just as many.
 
  • Thinking
Reactions: 2 users
Anyone remember how many shares were bought in when we got ASX 200? Because they also shorted just as many.
There was around 230m shares bought in the post trade auction on rebalance day. Not all of them were ASX200/300 buys but most would have been. Some would have been added later too. That big spike in the shorts was at the same time so would have been mostly instos hedging. I reckon a good chunk of the 30m closed short positions have just been firms returning shares they lent themselves for the hedge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Top Bottom