How much is the 15% worth, $150 million? Felix is going to need quick funds
Yeah hey, fancy questioning a board that has had obvious disclosure issues and handed themselves millions of freebies at the same time...we should all just get into line and follow blindly... and then the nerve of us to comment about it on a forum....Pretty much same as usual reading today.
Lots of whining, lots of opinions by people who have never actually done anything to help the company or other shareholders let alone research anything, apart from the odd shareholder like @Carlos Danger and whats that Carlos…. After 3 pages of whining they didn’t actually get any bonuses last financial year.
Not sure many people here actually read a whole Annual Report, so thanks for your posts Carlos, at least I now know one other person did. I wouldn’t bother explaining abbreviations like LTI’s or STI’s, there’s probably one too many letters in there for those people.
My own personal view for my own reasons is I wouldn’t be worried whether or not Zijin turn up at the ICC, and following on from that, the granting of the ML.
As far as disclosure and remunerations, for all the whiner’s who have been breastfed until they got to big school, I’m sorry that the BOD gets remunerations and didn’t disclose more to us because we could have had a share price in the 20c range…. then the whiners would all be happy and dreaming they were still on their mummy’s left tit.
Yes, I know how hard it is…. I’ve got shares in three companies all of which are dealing with corruption and other issues in Africa and all of which have been in suspension for extended periods. What better way to support them than turning against them eh, who cares if they’re on the frontline.
Why don’t you whiners give Jerkoff, Math, Huljich, Tommy or Boatman a call, I’m sure they’ll tell you the best way to get the share price back down 20 cents and no doubt they’ll all have a sympathetic ear.
One last little bit of information for the dumbfucks, the biggest thing that came out of the 2023 DRC Battery Metals event was the attention that was drawn to the corruption there and most of you wouldn’t even have a clue why.
As for me, I’ll be happy to leave the threads to all the breastfeeding whiners now, I don’t think I’ll be missing much as I can’t actually remember one post from them that had any information relevant to what AVZ has been dealing with.
It's starting to get really old that every time someone criticises this BOD they are labelled a whinger for not doing anything to help AVZ. When I invested, I checked the resource, the company and DRC political situation. I took a calculated risk and understood that I might lose my cash. I didn't invest thinking I would be required to troll through multiple social media platforms defending AVZ. I don't claim to have contacts in the DRC or within AVZ as some on here claim, I just invested based on what I could research. If I'm not happy with the cone of silence BOD and their bonus payments,I should be able to say so here without being labelled a whinger.Yeah hey, fancy questioning a board that has had obvious disclosure issues and handed themselves millions of freebies at the same time...we should all just get into line and follow blindly... and then the nerve of us to comment about it on a forum....
BTW, either the remuneration report or the notes is wrong... as accrual accounting doesn't allow for payments in different periods to be reported in the current one unless derived/earnt this year.. and well, there was no employee entitlements owing at 30 June 2022 or 2023... so they've stuffed something up...
A dangerous move for him to react like that, especially as someone could relate his reaction to that of last year with Klaus and AJN, and what's transpired since. A well-constructed reply would make him look very amateurish. I doubt the room would allow him so much wriggle room this time if no movement has occurred by AGM.Do you remember Nigel's attitude toward questions asked at the last AGM re his involvement with AJN / Klaus ? Unless he is bearing good news I am fairly certain his response to questions re bonuses will be met with the same reply .
Funny how they are not in hereGuys, be mindful of Morningsuit5 on HC and Calling on Governance on X. Reckon it’s MMGA scum in disguise.
And the fuckstain has landed on the x and recycling the sameFunny how they are not in here
it would be a fun thirty minutes for those who caught it
I sincerly apologise roon, here's hoping all turns out well soon for all shareholders.I was actually agreeing with you Geo, for once, if you read the post. On the higher end for an explored-cum-developer but not unusual. I don't take issue with actual AVZ salaries.
13)…At last AGM Nigel admitted his lack of communication towards SH which needed improving …since then have read no announcements headed ..Dear Fucking Shareholders12) Most of the people complaining on TSE aren't happy with the level of transparency from the BOD prior to suspension. While acknowledging the BoD needs to keep cards close to their chests in matters relating to dealing with Manono ownership issue; a lack of transparency and hence accountability to shareholders re: KPIs, and assessment of whether they have been achieved re: bonuses is expected.
I support the BoD, but the lack of transparency around certain areas with no justification plus the dismissive attitude of Nigel at the last AGM and roadshows leaves a sour taste. We aren't an inconvenience. We are part owners who pay their remuneration and a bit of respect from them would go a long way.
Finding out the BoD has awarded themselves bonuses in a report without any justification and transparency around why they consider this reasonable is the main issue.
Getting bonuses is ok. Getting bonuses without clear KPIs or reasoning behind the awarding of bonuses is not. A lot of us work hard and deal with external factors and shittiness in our jobs every day that stop us getting bonuses. We still don't get them if we don't get the results required.
Anyone have any info in an ASX announcement that outlines to shareholders what the BoD needed to achieve to get bonuses, or an assessment of whether these KPIs were met? I haven't seen it.
Here’s a couple of facts
3) With the number of Chinese shareholders in the Top 20, the three puppets…. Huljich, Carrick and Ludbrook will already be getting a percentage of votes