Winenut
Go AVZ!
Yes that little play on words did occur to me at the time JohnI would have thought more …”under the influence(r)”…
I truly am tragic...
Yes that little play on words did occur to me at the time JohnI would have thought more …”under the influence(r)”…
I’m offended, I missed them
refer to the advice aboveMe too
Over to you Nigel would you take a measly $1.5 TO offer with the BFS up your sleeve ?Would love a nice TO price, but honestly what does it matter the potential TO price when we appear to be at risk of being screwed over completely and losing everything. A TO at just $1.50 would be a massive relief after all this
Well, the roller coaster shit fight with AVZ / DRC/ CHYNA has just added another layer of poo and more emotional anguish / confusion for LTH.....News headline received for AVZ
CSID Arbitration Proceedings
Lets see what it says
View attachment 38063 .
Liontown 2.2b SOI x Albermarle 2.35 AUD offer = 5.17b AUDLiontown knocked back $2.50. I would want at least $3
Carlos is correct here in talking market cap over SP.Liontown 2.2b SOI x Albermarle 2.35 AUD offer = 5.17b AUD
5.17b x 0.67 current AUDUSD exchange rate = 3.48b USD
A takeover of AVZ at the 1.81 AUD price that Zijin and Cominiere are claiming for damages is 5.66b USD
5.66b USD x 1.48 current USDAUD exchange rate = 8.4b AUD
AVZ 1.81 is a 62.5% higher valuation than Liontown 2.35
Liontown 2.2b SOI x Albermarle 2.35 AUD offer = 5.17b AUD
5.17b x 0.67 current AUDUSD exchange rate = 3.48b USD
A takeover of AVZ at the 1.81 AUD price that Zijin and Cominiere are claiming for damages is 5.66b USD
5.66b USD x 1.48 current USDAUD exchange rate = 8.4b AUD
AVZ 1.81 is a 62.5% higher valuation than Liontown 2.35
It is roughly $12 Hong Kong dollarsLiontown 2.2b SOI x Albermarle 2.35 AUD offer = 5.17b AUD
5.17b x 0.67 current AUDUSD exchange rate = 3.48b USD
A takeover of AVZ's 75% of Dathcom at the 1.81 AUD price that Zijin and Cominiere are claiming for damages values Manono at 5.66b USD
5.66b USD x 1.48 current USDAUD exchange rate = 8.4b AUD
AVZ 1.81 is a 62.5% higher valuation than Liontown 2.35
I like the theory, but doesn't it have a big flaw: If the gringos are capable of getting the decree cancelled, why would a takeover be necessary? Can't they just arrange for the ML to be granted elsewhere?I'd be shocked if it wasn't the gringos that got the licence decree cancelled. No chance they will fund the battery value chain without controlling the primary asset. MOU was signed in December and a month later we lose our rights with the MoM citing bullshit and having a view to 'save the Manono project'.
Takeover incoming from the gringos imo
But none of the money can go to China. That's why Jin Cheng were removed from Dathcom. And Cominiere's share goes directly to the DRC government. Just a wild guess off the top of my head the takeover price for the entirety of the Manono project will be somewhere around 5.66b USD (1.81 AUD per AVZ share).
View attachment 38129
View attachment 38130
Dathcom still legally own the tenement. It would be much easier to buy us out than go through all the legal dramas of having it just awarded to someone else. The gringos are ruthless but they wouldn't be with an Australian company imoI like the theory, but doesn't it have a big flaw: If the gringos are capable of getting the decree cancelled, why would a takeover be necessary? Can't they just arrange for the ML to be granted elsewhere?
Then they would open themselves up to arbitration proceedings which could amount to billions and billions as the project starts generating money and it becomes obvious what it is really worth. USA are supposed to be an Australian ally also. May be better to pay $2 now rather than have a $10 billion arbitration claim.I like the theory, but doesn't it have a big flaw: If the gringos are capable of getting the decree cancelled, why would a takeover be necessary? Can't they just arrange for the ML to be granted elsewhere?
If Jens turns out to be right at least once dear god make it now. Ffs
Yes agreed. But the guarantee will be to the buyer not AVZ so we will be valued as is. The gringos will not allow China to have ownership or all of the supply of the only scalable high quality lithium deposit in the region and agree to make batteries in the DRC and Zambia imoI doubt any company would offer AVZ a TO without a guarantee the govt would issue a ML to go with it, which should value AVZ around $15 billion or about $5 a share. Future value would be higher than that ($12) but it’s all irrelevant until AVZ wins all arbitration cases.
Yes agreed. But the guarantee will be to the buyer not AVZ so we will be valued as is. The gringos will not allow China to have ownership or all of the supply of the only scalable high quality lithium deposit in the region and agree to make batteries in the DRC and Zambia imo
Obviously I could be wrong and this is all a guess but I just can't shake the feeling that Zijin being removed from Dathcom while they and Cominiere claim damages for such a specific amount from AVZ being a coincidence. There was a quote by that Boatman dweeb in the AFR's hit piece on Nigel in February that has a nugget of truth in it.
“They thought it was a goer; they got the mining decree and it was all going well,” he said. “Clearly, more powerful forces – and I assume those were Chinese, of what faction I don’t know – had gone presumably to the president, who says: ‘No AVZ doesn’t get the licence.’ I suspect what the DRC government is doing is playing everyone off against each other and see who offers the best deal.”
No one is offering a better deal than the gringos imo