9cardomaha
Regular
No the two cases have different arbitrators, and the dathomir one hasn't even set the proceeding schedule to my knowledge.Does this delay also affect Simon Cong dispute ?
The current run of ZJ vs AVZ was that they had prep time 4-5months, then AVZ requested that the hearing by bifurcated (heard in two parts, with the first being jurisdiction). Arbitrator agreed, despite ZJ's rejection.
So ultimatley, after first is heard, Arbitrator decides whether he has jurisdiction to hear the mountain of bullshit that is ZJ's case. Our strategy would be to just get it thrown out and then use the ruling in following legal disputes for preemptive rights.
The current status of AVZ vs Dathomir should be in the document prep stage or drawing close to document request stage, once all that is done, then they should be discussing the schedule, hence the anticipated 2024 resolution on this one.
EDIT: I'm not a lawyer, this is just from what i've seen from past cases that have been fully public and my understanding with the information i have on hand. Take it or leave it as always.