AVZ Discussion 2022

Nbaz

Regular
Hi Nbaz, the company id imagine is totally fine with it ; disclosing information was benefiting the distractions more than it was our negotiating. Tommy FT is probably deserves a bit of a thank you too! He seemed to have been able to dig some pretty confidential legal docs etc which showed that distractors were digging. ASX were apparently were getting all sorts of requests for information / suggesting ‘sesrch here’, ‘look at this’ in an attempt to try and force them to make AVZ open up and trade again.

Being able to tint those windows of the negotiations rooms, as they felt that they comply with 3.1 / disclosure seemed to put them on the backfoot every now and again, after they had thought they had taken a few steps forward...personally I'm happy with the move.

ASX also seemed happy enough with their responses to the questions and put them into actually suspension using the answer to question 9 where AVZ stated that they couldn't conform to 3.1 as it was effectively causing issues, basically gave AVZ what they needed. Omni bridgeway if they had anyone on board would have preferred if as had of batted back some of those responses...but that didn't seem to happen and AVZ can be somewhat relieved that their announcements aren't twisted etc by distractors and repeated elsewhere to other parties with apparent triple meanings
Thanks for your insights. It's something I've never gone though as a shareholder and dare say not many have, so it was a bit daunting seeing the announcement drop this morning.
Hopefully it means AVZ can now get everything sorted safely and not have to worry about everything getting out before it's all confirmed.
Appreciate your words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15 users

obe wan

Regular
The applicant, Dathcom, does have 51% as required. If you don't believe me then all good.



I am more interested in people's thoughts as to what can potentially change in DRC for them to finally issue the licence.


Vital Kamerhe?

Martin Fayulu?

Do people think negotiations will be ongoing in the background? Seemed like AVZ could not get meetings and were no longer in the loop. I hope we are not left waiting for 2-3 years while things play out at the ICC.
“The applicant, Dathcom, does have 51% as required. If you don't believe me then all good.”

Ye but thats the jv ; need to have a , majority holder within the jv which in this case is AVZ inside dathcom....one of the tasks is that majority holders is basically the one that prepares the applications as opposed to multiple non controlling administrators within the jv for obvious reasons
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users
We have come so far to lose all hope now. We are so close with the end in sight. Hang in there everyone.

Sons of Nigel!

Of AVZ!

My brothers my sisters!

I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me.

A day may come when the courage of AVZ investors fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day.

An hour of wolves and shattered shields when the investment of AVZ comes crashing down, but it is not this day!

This day we fight!

By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand, Investors of the AVZ!

the lord of the rings GIF
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 28 users

Dazmac66

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 10 users

Onthefm

Regular
We have come so far to lose all hope now. We are so close with the end in sight. Hang in there everyone.

Sons of Nigel!

Of AVZ!

My brothers my sisters!

I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me.

A day may come when the courage of AVZ investors fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day.

An hour of wolves and shattered shields when the investment of AVZ comes crashing down, but it is not this day!

This day we fight!

By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand, Investors of the AVZ!

the lord of the rings GIF
Jesus it's only money mate. I wouldn't get that wound up.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Article 67 (operating permit) of the 2018 Mining Code.

e) create, on each transformation, as part of a separate mine or a separate mining project, an affiliate in which the applicant company holds at least 51% of the shares;
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

9cardomaha

Regular
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 20 users

Frank

Top 20
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 21 users

CashKing

Regular
Hi Nbaz, the company id imagine is totally fine with it ; disclosing information was benefiting the distractions more than it was our negotiating. Tommy FT is probably deserves a bit of a thank you too! He seemed to have been able to dig some pretty confidential legal docs etc which showed that distractors were digging. ASX were apparently were getting all sorts of requests for information / suggesting ‘sesrch here’, ‘look at this’ in an attempt to try and force them to make AVZ open up and trade again.

Being able to tint those windows of the negotiations rooms, as they felt that they comply with 3.1 / disclosure seemed to put them on the backfoot every now and again, after they had thought they had taken a few steps forward...personally I'm happy with the move.

ASX also seemed happy enough with their responses to the questions and put them into actually suspension using the answer to question 9 where AVZ stated that they couldn't conform to 3.1 as it was effectively causing issues, basically gave AVZ what they needed. Omni bridgeway if they had anyone on board would have preferred if as had of batted back some of those responses...but that didn't seem to happen and AVZ can be somewhat relieved that their announcements aren't twisted etc by distractors and repeated elsewhere to other parties with apparent triple meanings
Ummmm Hoots and the trolls over at Crapper would word it different mate but a BIG FUCK THEM on my behalf…
GLTAH
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users
Tommy is a fucking moron

AVZ have never owned, or claimed to own, the 15% from Cominiere

Only 15% of the 75% that AVZ legally owns is 'under dispute'. And that's the 15% from Dathomir.

How does this dickhead still have a job. He can't even do simple arithmetic yet is employed by a financial news organisation. Unbelievable.

20230413_005929.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 27 users

DoubleA

Regular
Maybe Minister of Mines is more on AVZ side than I previously thought. I am tired and don't have time to go through and analyse everything he said

 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Rambo

Regular
Maybe Minister of Mines is more on AVZ side than I previously thought. I am tired and don't have time to go through and analyse everything he said


It sounds like he said avz has had a meeting with the head of state and said the journalist was full of shit. So minister of mines filled a complaint against him and he was arrested. He also said something about a signature yesterday revoking avz contract. Translation isn’t great, but I think that’s what he said. I only had time to watch the first half.
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
He ist defending himself....

And of course He tells Tales about AVZ.... Referring to AFR and frustrated tweets
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Rambo

Regular
He ist defending himself....

And of course He tells Tales about AVZ.... Referring to AFR and frustrated tweets
He ist defending himself....

And of course He tells Tales about AVZ.... Referring to AFR and frustrated tweets
Just watched the rest. He is definitely defending himself and trying to gain public support. Does a fair bit of apologizing as well. Need to watch that a couple times over later today to get everything out of it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

JAG

Top 20
1681333659573.png
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

Rambo

Regular
he talked about the meeting with the president last year. And he talking a lot of bullshit.
But that one thing with the contract revoking need to be translated rightly.

Because when I use the wordings in the subtitle and put them in a translater and try to puzzle the words in the right sentences this comes out:

"because cominiere finally decided on a formal termination yesterday, it was three months before, and after this formal termination the contract was simply revoked."

That would mean cominiere canceled the contract 2 days ago? Is that possible?

Would be crazy, but I believe cominiere would try everything. These bunch of assholes can only lie and nothing more.

Need a better translation.
He is full of shit and he is vary vague. He apologizes yet is proud of the work he has done. Other than trying to garner support from his followers, I don’t know what the point of this is. I don’t believe anything he says. Whatever he is in trouble for it has something to do with avz and cominier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

RHyNO

Regular
Prove me wrong someone smarter than I, but surely there is material fact in Tommy’s takedown, surely the failure to inform shareholders about these ownership disputes when they happened is not only illegal according to ASX but arrogant on behalf of management. These attempts are not spirrilus media claims but in fact considered attempts to purchase our resource in a very real way that have now been taken to ICC by those making said claims. Management off to play golf with mates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Flight996

Regular

AFR: ASX suspends AVZ for non-compliance with listing rules


Here (below) is the URL in order side-step Nine Entertainment's paywall and read the entire article. It doesn't look much, but it works.
Of course, it's authored by Tommy Swallows and Zijin Mining so you may prefer to skip it and not waste 5min of you life reading it.


Cheers
F
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Doc

Master of Quan
Prove me wrong someone smarter than I, but surely there is material fact in Tommy’s takedown, surely the failure to inform shareholders about these ownership disputes when they happened is not only illegal according to ASX but arrogant on behalf of management. These attempts are not spirrilus media claims but in fact considered attempts to purchase our resource in a very real way that have now been taken to ICC by those making said claims. Management off to play golf with mates.
Tommy the twat had been biased against AVZ from day dot. You think his articles are in any way, shape or form unbiased and well researched pieces?
The ASX has been all over AVZ for the last few years, I’d say one of the most scrutinized companies on ASX. They have been ok with it.
I’ve been critical of AVZ management but fair suck of the sav forming an opinion from these bullshit biased articles from AFR is just plain stupid imo.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 16 users
Top Bottom