Sitting On the same desk as our Imminent Mining Licence.Where is this Minister Reshuffle that was supposed to happen a month ago ?
I just wonder who will play Nige when they make a Netflix series about this.
You can have a baby after being fucked in the arse?Time for Nige to deliver the baby after being fucked over!
So Klaus would be the cinematographer?
Wouldn't take a lot of acting skills to play Nigel . Or just get a card board cutout with moving lips . Nells can be the star . The movie finishes with her kicking Nigel in the nuts .I just wonder who will play Nige when they make a Netflix series about this.
Classic... i wonder who will get accidentally shot by him on set?
Sausage sizzle is on …Party at your place when we hit the big 5-0??
The licence was cancelled, we still hold the tenement.I remember the statement of Klaus in the Axinocapital Interview from 14th january so I heard it again a few times:
„In the last 8 weeks all license’s got canceled, and the partner need to sit together to make a new deal over roche dure. But this is not in relation to the manono north license but have a general impact in the transfer of licenses.“
Klaus repeated the cancelation of all Manono Licenses at the begin of the video and in the middle. So I think it was no mispronounced from him.
It looks like Klaus is on the money and have the better insights and after his statement he is in the DRC since the end of january (said in the Interview in 2 weeks...so maybe before the 28th january) and tries to close the deal with manono north as soon as possible. He expect that something will definitive move in the next 3 months.
I have send the Interview to the management after I saw it the first time and I'm sure axinocapital did the same.
I asked the management what it means the manono licenses got canceled but I got no response. So our Management must had a information about a cancelation process.
Two weeks later the MoM canceled the decrees. So it looks like its truth the partner need to sit together to make a new deal over roche dure.
The final question: Is AVZ still a part of the partners who need to make a new deal over roche dure or not? Did they got informed about a cancelation?
If not it would be a really bad sign.
A other thought...AJN stated the nothern part is under dispute, to acquire it the dispute need to be settled. One option...cancel the decree to make it free for a new aquiration process.
Now the question is are both parts of the license are automatically rejoined together after the cancellation??
I think a lot is being kept secret from us, it looks like there is only the possibility that avz is in negotiations and still a part or we really have already been thrown out without information. But "seeking legal advice and needed discussion to clarify the intentions of the DRC and fighting for a just outcome" in comparison to "The Company is steadfast in its resolve of achieving a positive outcome for shareholders" are two worlds that give me the feeling that we could no longer sitting at the negotiating table anymore.
Should we all send this to the AFR?Now, how to I get the Australian Government interested in this debacle?
Sausage sizzle is on …
Somehow you have to bring race or gender into itNow, how to I get the Australian Government interested in this debacle?
Sausage sizzle is on …
Somehow you have to bring race or gender into it
If FIRB stopped the YIBIN deal because they had an interest in Australia's requirement for critical minerals, would they be interested in the Chinese using corruption to try and steal Manono?Somehow you have to bring race or gender into it
Different Government in now, although the thematic surrounding strategic minerals hasn't changed. I doubt we could do much, but I dare say they may tap their bigger stronger older brother on the shoulder an tell him that Zijin are not playing fair (USA btw)If FIRB stopped the YIBIN deal because they had an interest in Australia's requirement for critical minerals, would they be interested in the Chinese using corruption to try and steal Manono?
Sent this to the AFR:
Good morning,
I would like to make a formal complaint about Tom Richardson and his recent articles regarding AVZ Minerals. The 'stories' are extremely one sided, overly suggestive and have a number of factual errors or omissions.
I note that the recent ruling against the AFR for very similar type of reporting where Justice Anna Katzmann found that the articles were "spiced with an account of suspicious circumstances" against a politician. And that, "The ordinary reasonable reader is prone to loose thinking and reads between the lines. And that is precisely what the respondents encouraged them to do. This article was
I will be doing that today. Enough is enough!Should we all send this to the AFR?