There it is. Placement / Cap raise.
The SC has dealt them a bad hand, but can we agree that the company has played this hand very poorly?
I don't agree. Everything is easy to figure out afterwards. Of course, with today's knowledge it would have been better to raise double the amount during the previous CR. But if they had done that and the court's ruling had come in this week, everyone would have been angry because Talga issued too many shares at too low a price.
I am convinced that Talga and Mark have done everything they can to handle this well, it is simply bad luck that the legal system in Sweden is so rotten. If the incoming capital helps us to bridge the coming period well, then there is no problem in the long term. The appeals are rejected with 98% certainty based on historical results, from there the financing from the EIB, among others, comes through and the world looks very different. With 420 million shares outstanding (in the case of an additional 40 million to be issued), Talga still has a relatively low amount of shares in circulation.
Some people may be too positive here, but it's clear that you're on the extremely negative end of the spectrum. Both are unrealistic and I wonder what your motivations are for this.