The fact that DLA Piper is assisting AVZ is comforting. I asked Copilot the following question.
"How good is DLA Piper at negotiating a favourable settlement in cases similar to the AVZ scenario, give examples."
The answer is good ...
"DLA Piper is widely regarded as one of the top global law firms for handling complex cross-border disputes, including investment treaty arbitration and mining sector negotiations—both highly relevant to the AVZ scenario.
While specific case outcomes are often confidential, here’s what we can draw from public records and their track record:
Strengths Relevant to AVZ’s Case
Notable Examples
Implications for AVZ
Given DLA Piper’s deep bench of arbitration specialists, sector-specific knowledge, and experience navigating political risk, they are well-positioned to negotiate a favorable outcome for AVZ—whether through a KoBold-facilitated settlement or a full ICSID ruling.
Would you like a breakdown of how DLA Piper might structure a hybrid settlement in this context?"
"How good is DLA Piper at negotiating a favourable settlement in cases similar to the AVZ scenario, give examples."
The answer is good ...
"DLA Piper is widely regarded as one of the top global law firms for handling complex cross-border disputes, including investment treaty arbitration and mining sector negotiations—both highly relevant to the AVZ scenario.
While specific case outcomes are often confidential, here’s what we can draw from public records and their track record:

- Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): DLA Piper has represented both investors and states in ICSID and UNCITRAL arbitrations. Their experience includes disputes over expropriation, mining licenses, and regulatory interference—core issues in AVZ’s claim against the DRC.
- Mining & Energy Sector Expertise: The firm has advised on resource nationalization disputes, joint venture breakdowns, and permit revocations, often in Africa and Latin America.
- Settlement Strategy: DLA Piper emphasizes early dispute resolution where possible, using mediation, structured negotiations, and hybrid settlement frameworks—similar to the KoBold-AVZ framework.

- Vedanta Resources v. Zambia: DLA Piper advised Vedanta in a dispute over the seizure of a copper mine. The case involved ICSID arbitration and complex negotiations with the Zambian government.
- Tethyan Copper Company v. Pakistan: While not directly involved, DLA Piper has cited this case in its publications as a benchmark for large-scale mining arbitration, showcasing their familiarity with billion-dollar claims.
- Confidential African Mining Dispute: In a matter involving a revoked mining license in West Africa, DLA Piper reportedly helped secure a favorable settlement through a combination of arbitration and diplomatic engagement.

Given DLA Piper’s deep bench of arbitration specialists, sector-specific knowledge, and experience navigating political risk, they are well-positioned to negotiate a favorable outcome for AVZ—whether through a KoBold-facilitated settlement or a full ICSID ruling.
Would you like a breakdown of how DLA Piper might structure a hybrid settlement in this context?"