BRN Discussion Ongoing

IloveLamp

Top 20
Screenshot_20230721_205728_LinkedIn.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 23 users

Learning

Learning to the Top 🕵‍♂️
With all these partnerships is BRN taking a leaf out of Don Juans book?
I am a believer of;

"the more the merrier" philosophy.

As long as, it's beneficial AI for both partners. 😆

Learning 🏖
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 6 users

Rach2512

Regular

From the website

Automotive, Intel, News, July 2020

Mobileye, an Intel company, and Ford Motor Company are collaborating on cutting-edge driver-assistance systems across Ford’s global product lineup.




From May 2020

After the introduction of AKD1000, BrainChip has recently signed two agreements, post which the Company noted a significant improvement in its share price in the past couple of weeks. BRN shares, which settled at A$0.058 on 22 May 2020 reached A$0.120 on 9 June 2020, representing a growth of ~106.9%.

Agreement with Ford Motor Company for the Evaluation of AkidaTM Neural Processor

On 24 May 2020, the Company signed a joint agreement with Detroit-based Company for evaluation of the Akida neural network System-on-Chip for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems & Autonomous Vehicle applications.
The evaluation agreement was binding on execution which was signed into with Ford Motor Company and is not the subject of a fixed term. The deal is based upon a partnership to assess Akida as it relates to the automotive industry & payments under the agreement proposed to cover related expenses and received periodically during the evaluation process.


Plus as confirmed today by FactFinder, (great to hear from you FF) we are still dealing with Ford and Intel. Does this kind of make a dot?


Happy Friday all ❤
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 39 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
I understand why you would prefer not to mention them, but the reality is that their lies are read by more people than the TSEx readership.

It would be interesting to plot the coincidence of MF hit pieces against BrainChip good news.
361249595_10230878086758426_5498187781818958627_n.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 13 users

macro

Member
Do we have a link / dot to Mobileye? I can’t remember
I was listening to an interview with Emad Mostaque and he uses Perplexity rather than ChatGPT or Bing because it gives you sources. So I tried it.

Is Brainchip linked to Mobileye?

Answer

There is no evidence that BrainChip is linked to Mobileye. BrainChip is a semiconductor company that produces ultra-low power, fully digital, event-based, neuromorphic AI IP 2 4

They have recently signed two contracts with Valeo Corporation 1

On the other hand, Mobileye is a company that produces automotive sensor products 3 5

They are known for their EyeQ series of SoCs, which are used in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) 5 6

While both companies operate in the field of AI and semiconductors, there is no indication that they have any direct business relationship or partnership.

 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Thinking
Reactions: 10 users

Xray1

Regular
Hi JD
Your post brought me here much sooner than I anticipated but so be it. The following I believe destroys any ill-conceived notion that those you are addressing might attempt to promulgate that AKD1000 was a failure. If it was a failure then Brainchip would not exist as it is built from the same neural fabric which is the underpinnings of all AKIDA technology.
Kind regards
Fact Finder.

MY QUESTION:
"Hi Tony - 26.4.23
I perhaps jumped the gun on one part of my criticisms having received an email this morning advertising the podcast.
As a result of the answer Sean gave regarding the AKIDA 2nd Gen the manipulators have been out in force relying upon his answer to claim AKD1000 has been a dud.
I am not concerned about this but perhaps this is something to keep in mind for further presentations.
After all AKD1000 achieved the only IP sales in the history of Brainchip to Renesas and MegaChips not to mention the EAP customer engagements.
One clarification I have is around the neural fabric used in AKD1000, AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen.
My understanding was/is that the neural fabric was/is the same across all three. Is this correct?
If so then essentially the only difference is the additions to or the takeaways from, such as removing the CPU from AKD1500?

Also I have assumed that this being the case it is open to potential customers to purchase more or less nodes of AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen as Renesas did of AKD1000?
Regards
FF

THE ANSWER:

Tony Dawe <tdawe@brainchip.com>​

Wed, Apr 26, 12:58 PM
to me
Hi .....,

I referred your question on technology to Peter van der Made.

Peter has replied below.

“The neural fabric is the same across all three chips, with minor modifications to allow for new functions. The AI market is a fast moving field, with new network technologies that appear every few months. We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.


We took away the CPU from the AKD1500 to provide clients with a neuromorphic processor that is smaller and has a lower power consumption. This was the result of customer interactions because MCUs have their own CPU. The onboard CPU in AKD1000 makes sense for a stand-alone chip. Our IP is integrated within an MCU, so they do not need the CPU.

The AKD1000 is not superseded and remains part of our offering as a single-chip solution.”

I hope Peter’s response addresses your question.

Regards


Tony Dawe
Director, Global Investor Relations
Thanks Fact Finder, for your sharing of such substantially significant and substantiated responses received back from the Co and Tony Dawe.

In regards to Peter's actual response especially imo: I think, that this has a very deep and meaningful connection with Vorago and the US DoD (DARPA) noting that: https://brainchipinc.com/brainchip-and-vorago-technologies-agree-to-collaborate-through-the-akida-early-access-program-2/

Bernd Lienhard, VORAGO CEO added, “We are thrilled and honored to partner with BrainChip to harness the radiation hardening capabilities of our patented HARDSIL® technology for the Phase I program with NASA. Our ongoing mission of creating components with increased availability and unmatched solutions in aerospace and defense applications paired with the Akida neuromorphic processor will create unprecedented standards moving forward in the industry.”

If memory serves me right, I think they went from Phase I to Phase 3 within a very short period of time ..then absolute silence..... IMO, I personally believe that there is so much happening with Vorago and DARPA under NDA's and potential National Security reasons both in the US and here in Australia ........... I think that this collaboration connection especially will result in unprecedented revenue streams and just may most likely out-do all our other partnership's. ...... time will tell.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 34 users

Diogenese

Top 20
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

charles2

Regular



Hi JD
Your post brought me here much sooner than I anticipated but so be it. The following I believe destroys any ill-conceived notion that those you are addressing might attempt to promulgate that AKD1000 was a failure. If it was a failure then Brainchip would not exist as it is built from the same neural fabric which is the underpinnings of all AKIDA technology.
Kind regards
Fact Finder.

MY QUESTION:
"Hi Tony - 26.4.23
I perhaps jumped the gun on one part of my criticisms having received an email this morning advertising the podcast.
As a result of the answer Sean gave regarding the AKIDA 2nd Gen the manipulators have been out in force relying upon his answer to claim AKD1000 has been a dud.
I am not concerned about this but perhaps this is something to keep in mind for further presentations.
After all AKD1000 achieved the only IP sales in the history of Brainchip to Renesas and MegaChips not to mention the EAP customer engagements.
One clarification I have is around the neural fabric used in AKD1000, AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen.
My understanding was/is that the neural fabric was/is the same across all three. Is this correct?
If so then essentially the only difference is the additions to or the takeaways from, such as removing the CPU from AKD1500?

Also I have assumed that this being the case it is open to potential customers to purchase more or less nodes of AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen as Renesas did of AKD1000?
Regards
FF

THE ANSWER:

Tony Dawe <tdawe@brainchip.com>​

Wed, Apr 26, 12:58 PM
to me
Hi .....,

I referred your question on technology to Peter van der Made.

Peter has replied below.

“The neural fabric is the same across all three chips, with minor modifications to allow for new functions. The AI market is a fast moving field, with new network technologies that appear every few months. We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.


We took away the CPU from the AKD1500 to provide clients with a neuromorphic processor that is smaller and has a lower power consumption. This was the result of customer interactions because MCUs have their own CPU. The onboard CPU in AKD1000 makes sense for a stand-alone chip. Our IP is integrated within an MCU, so they do not need the CPU.

The AKD1000 is not superseded and remains part of our offering as a single-chip solution.”

I hope Peter’s response addresses your question.

Regards


Tony Dawe
Director, Global Investor Relations
We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.


Ice hockey star Wayne Gretzky famously said, “I skate to where the puck is going, not where it has been.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 29 users

Diogenese

Top 20
We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.


Ice hockey star Wayne Gretzky famously said, “I skate to where the puck is going, not where it has been.
just wait til you see BrainChip's hockey stick!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 55 users

Dallas

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 60 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 75 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 73 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
So nice of the Senior customer success manager at GOOGLE to post about Brainchip don't you think??

Tick fkn Tok



View attachment 40518 View attachment 40519
screenshot_20230722_083841_linkedin-jpg.40520
Screenshot_20230722_083925_LinkedIn.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230722_083841_LinkedIn.jpg
    Screenshot_20230722_083841_LinkedIn.jpg
    714.7 KB · Views: 978
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 54 users

rgupta

Regular
I was listening to an interview with Emad Mostaque and he uses Perplexity rather than ChatGPT or Bing because it gives you sources. So I tried it.

Is Brainchip linked to Mobileye?

Answer

There is no evidence that BrainChip is linked to Mobileye. BrainChip is a semiconductor company that produces ultra-low power, fully digital, event-based, neuromorphic AI IP 2 4

They have recently signed two contracts with Valeo Corporation 1

On the other hand, Mobileye is a company that produces automotive sensor products 3 5

They are known for their EyeQ series of SoCs, which are used in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) 5 6

While both companies operate in the field of AI and semiconductors, there is no indication that they have any direct business relationship or partnership.

To my understanding mobile eye is an Intel company. If that helps you.
 

Taproot

Regular
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

suss

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 17 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
Hi Folks. My Saturday morning musings......

It feels that what BrainChip has, in the current various iterations of Akida and the pipeline of what is to come in next generations, is now beginning to spill out from behind the NDA's, just due to the volume of critically relevant people who have been exposed to the possibilities of our tech.

That and the way AI is becoming ubiquitous within the mainstream lives of much of humanity, who are now connected to some degree by the link devices to supercomputers we all carry around and have become obsessed with.

I do not think of myself as a heavy user, yet my iPhone is constantly with me and within reach, when I go on my walks, to the dunny, whilst I sleep at night. It is now an ever present companion and can be a source of mild consternation ranging to perhaps outright anxiety whenever I become disconnected due to venturing to an area without sufficient coverage. I am becoming more and more reliant upon it with the skills of map reading, calligraphy and human interaction atrophying alongside the cultivation, preparation and preservation of the food I eat.

I assume the next stage will have "it" seeming to become more of a concierge or perhaps even "friend" relationship through the adoption of a far more personalised and integrated user interface along the lines of Siri or Alexa but with a much more "fleshed" out and curated "personality" who will come to replace all but the most outrageous of our fellow contemporaries.

Hard to know if this becomes utopia or dystopia over time, although either path seems to point to something of an amalgam between whatever of humanity which is not not able to be synthesised, along with, a rapidly evolving self directing technical intelligence.

What's all this got to do with BrainChip?
I think we are an enabling technology in this still nascent field of Neuromorphic computing allowing the integration of more and more of our physical world within the purview of a perhaps one day centralised and governing intelligence.

There are currently meetings and discussions occurring around the world about the potential dangers of the unrestricted development of AI but I am of the opinion that it's probably already too late. The momentum and the risk of not having our own version of this tech with which to counter a rival's has become too great to stop. Perhaps something akin to the race to develop the Atomic bomb during WW2.

I'm glad to be invested in BrainChip as a pioneer in our field for at least I have some confidence in the ethics and motivation of PVDM along with the BOD and Management that he has collected to manifest this in our world.
It's coming whether we are ready or not, whether we like it or not, but much prefer it championed and enabled by liberal democracy's rather than only by totalitarian regimes.
For those interested in a vision of the current state of play I recommend.....

 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 49 users
Top Bottom