robsmark
Regular
I just don't believe that anyone on the Board of Directors or indeed in any senior management position that is likely to attend the AGM is either blind or deaf as to how their share holders view the share price of the Company.
Particularly when it has been subjected to blatant manipulation and shorting attacks reducing its daily valuation by two thirds from this time last year.
Or the sour taste that goes with continuing progress payments for employees whilst said share price languishes.
These are natural responses but to my mind unfounded and divorced from the reality of the situation.
The progress payments are not tied to the share price valuation.
Instead they are dependant upon individuals or sections reaching and exceeding certain KPI's which will be growth and performance based on Company expectations and requirements.
Where I have previously seen incentivization tied primarily to share price it has invariably led (over time) to a corruption of the business or it's managers based on the perverting influence of the predominance of the profit motive alone to the exclusion of other factors which sustain and keep growing a healthy business.
As long as the board and management team are following and executing a sound business plan they have my support and I don't see the value in beating them over the head with things they are already aware of and of which they have limited control.
Respectfully Hopalong, I think you’re missing the point.
“Particularly when it has been subjected to blatant manipulation and shorting attacks reducing its daily valuation by two thirds from this time last year.”
There is a reason we have been shorted - very little revenue and no new announced commercial customers. These institutions have entered our house, and they have destroyed our SP by shorting… but management gave them the keys.
“Instead they are dependant upon individuals or sections reaching and exceeding certain KPI's which will be growth and performance based on Company expectations and requirements.”
Some employees (then CEO, Marketing, BDM, anyone non technical for that matter) have KPIs which are likely bound or at least attached to financial performance. These have clearly not been met. Sean stated that we should have been financially self sufficient (early in 2022, though I forget where and when) by they end of last year, and he also said that he should be judged by his performance by this AGM. Lets face it - the SP dropping by 2/3rds isn’t a great achievement.
These people get paid a lot of money to be responsible for the management of a vessel that contains your money. Some on here need to stop making excuses and call it want it is.
My 2c - throw your punches at get it over with.