I reckon I counted 2 to pissed after that. Cheers mateYep, bloody hot and windy. Three spots of rain though.
Cheers
I reckon I counted 2 to pissed after that. Cheers mateYep, bloody hot and windy. Three spots of rain though.
Cheers
Yes the resource can be a trap.Fully understand you. It is more than frustrating. It seems like it is how it is for many many years. First the politicians with deep empty pockets. For my understanding the voice of the Manono people dont matter. Even if they come with pitchforks and torches Felix doesn't give a shit. The only matter is money, better today than tomorrow.
In future I wont invest in any of these African countrys again and I will have a more closer look at the management than the product.
I hear ya' brother.......Happy 41 weeks in suspension SH’s since being forced back to work by an incompetent and over paid B0D …we were a top 200 ASX stock but thanks to that over fat POS Felix …have lost all my drive on this thread …were promised a minister reshuffle & Jens credibility is fucking shot after he mouthed off about a decision in upcoming weeks …thanks @Frank for the job opportunity at head office but where are these pricks …is anyone actually in the DRC ..have we an office ,an announcement by Nigel or Ben be appreciated of WTF is actually happening …Give Cash or BEISHA the job …both JAG & myself are game fully employed Rant over …not Mantle worthy ..Have a great WE all
View attachment 29898
I wish. They are getting bank while I'm doing all this research for nothing haha
In this nicest way possible good sir, fuck what's going on with AVZ, Congratulations on the baby and house!F*ck me, a ~week off the thread and I come back to find we are semi fucked. The mental health forum break clearly didn’t work as planned !
Ah well fellas, I made the move to buy a house without the AVZ cash, Christ it’s a lot smaller than what I’d planned with my AVZ loot but the stress levels about waiting for us to come out of suspension are gone. Family stress over.
Just a note to say I really feel for the holders who are in financial stress as a result of this . I have been, with a newborn, and bloody hell it’s aged me and been a burden on my relationship. Whatever the outcome, you’ll end up ok.
Cheers
Usually Beer, Usually my mouthYes that seems to be the case...at some point water eventually finds the point of least resistance, hence why I want this thing wrapped up asap
Happy 41 weeks in suspension SH’s since being forced back to work by an incompetent and over paid B0D …we were a top 200 ASX stock but thanks to that over fat POS Felix …have lost all my drive on this thread …were promised a minister reshuffle & Jens credibility is fucking shot after he mouthed off about a decision in upcoming weeks …thanks @Frank for the job opportunity at head office but where are these pricks …is anyone actually in the DRC ..have we an office ,an announcement by Nigel or Ben be appreciated of WTF is actually happening …Give Cash or BEISHA the job …both JAG & myself are game fully employed Rant over …not Mantle worthy ..Have a great WE all
View attachment 29898
I fully hear you about the difference that an ANZ home run could make to your housing dreams and overall lifestyle expectations. While economists talk about the housing wealth affect, they fail to mention its poor cousin; the corrupt-African-disappearing-investment affect.F*ck me, a ~week off the thread and I come back to find we are semi fucked. The mental health forum break clearly didn’t work as planned !
Ah well fellas, I made the move to buy a house without the AVZ cash, Christ it’s a lot smaller than what I’d planned with my AVZ loot but the stress levels about waiting for us to come out of suspension are gone. Family stress over.
Just a note to say I really feel for the holders who are in financial stress as a result of this . I have been, with a newborn, and bloody hell it’s aged me and been a burden on my relationship. Whatever the outcome, you’ll end up ok.
Cheers
*To add, I see where,
Congo demands $17bn more in infrastructure investments from China deal
Congo’s state auditor has demanded an additional $17 billion of investments from a 2008 infrastructure-for-minerals deal with Chinese investors that is currently being renegotiated, documents seen by Reuters on Thursday showed.
![]()
President Felix Tshisekedi’s government has been revisiting the deal struck by his predecessor Joseph Kabila under which Sinohydro Corp and China Railway Group Limited agreed to build roads and hospitals in exchange for a 68% stake in Sicomines, a cobalt and copper joint venture with Congo’s state mining company Gecamines.
Under the Sicomines deal, the Chinese investors committed to spending $3 billion on infrastructure projects, but the state auditor – Inspection Generale des Finances (IGF) – demanded that commitment be increased to $20 billion, to reflect the value of the mining concessions that Gecamines contributed to the deal.
He has previously defended the deal, saying it had driven development for Congo’s people and that Sicomines would invest more as production increased.
So far, Sicomines has only spent $822 million on infrastructure investments, according to the IGF report seen by Reuters.
The auditor also called for an “immediate” $1 billion investment from Sicomines, and a commitment to 50% of the workforce on infrastructure projects being Congolese.
Among a list of 16 demands, the IGF called for the “renegotiation of the Convention to adjust and balance the duties and benefits of both parties and bring them into line with the value of their respective contributions”.
The auditor also demanded that Gecamines be given a bigger stake in Sicomines.
It currently has a 32% holding.
Congo’s finance minister Nicolas Kazadi told Reuters last month that the government expects to reach an agreement on the Sicomines deal this year.
mining.com
Race to secure lithium supplies is heating up
- Piedmont lands investment, binding offtake from LG Chem
- Car makers could invest up to US$600bn over 10 years on battery investments
- Sayona’s North American Lithium restart is on track and on budget
The scramble to secure critical minerals needed for the energy transition – as is highlighted by governmental action such as the US Inflation Reduction Act – is continuing apace.
Piedmont Lithium has just landed a $75m investment from South Korean chemical giant LG Chem – the parent of the world’s second largest battery cell maker, which included a binding commitment for the offtake of 200,000t of spodumene concentrate from its jointly-owned North American Lithium project over four years from the third quarter of 2023.
This comes mere days after LG told Bloomberg that it was looking to secure its own raw material through potential partnerships and investments to establish a self-sufficient supply chain.
Meanwhile, LithiumAmericas has closed the initial US$320m tranche of its previously announced US$650m investment by automotive giant General Motors, which will be used to accelerate development of its Thacker Pass lithium project in Humboldt County, Nevada.
ARK Investment Management’s Sam Korus believes that others will seek to strike deals to secure lithium supplies while pointing out that global automakers have earmarked US$600bn for battery investments over the next 10 years.
Li-Bridge – a US public-private alliance committed to accelerating the development of a robust and secure domestic supply chain for lithium-based batteries – also warned that the US would still depend on imports despite an expected increase in domestic lithium battery demand of up to six times by 2030.
However, it noted that the US could still capture some 60% of the economic value consumed by domestic demand for lithium batteries, generating US$33bn in revenues and creating 100,000 jobs.
What all this means is that we are likely to see further investments from battery and car manufacturers looking to lock in their supply chains and supportive government legislation such as the US Inflation Reduction Act are likely to play a key role in their decision making process.
Sayona Mining which is incidentally the majority partner at North American Lithium, certainly seems to think that the move from companies such as LG Chem will be positive, telling fellow Stockhead reporter Jessica Cummins that its operations in Quebec will have a big role to play in closing some of the supply gap given its proximity to the US.
This is particularly true given that the Inflation Reduction Act provides tax credits to manufacturers with 40% or more (rising to 80% in 2027) of their raw materials coming from the US or nations with which it has free-trade agreements, which include both Australia and Canada.
View attachment 29899
Same here Titts …was watching a movie with grand kids …Was watching planet of the apes last night with the missus. Suddenly a scene came up that I had never noticed before, it was powerful now I fully understood it.
This link may display a high level of honesty conveyed in the stylistically captivating form referred to as swearing
https://madlipz.com/p/ed5rlbi19566n4
See last paragraph from this announcement.I would like to understand if the decree cancelling Dathcom's right to mine also cancels the relinquishment of the northern part of CDL.
In other words, when Nigel agreed to cede a portion of the northern tenement, was it conditional or unconditional?
To unconditionally cede and not caveat the agreement would seem amateurish.
Does anyone know if the change was caveated?
Thanks in advance
F
*To add, I see where Old China ain't Happy Jan, asChinese contracts: the IGF shouts at the sell-off of the country's mining resources and reveals the mafia network!
View attachment 29820
What everyone feared in what has since been called "Chinese Contracts" has just come true.
A report by the General Inspectorate of Finance, IGF, highlights that the Republic has sold off its resources in its contracts concluded under Kabila.
In fact, not having fresh capital to boost the development of the country, the regime had entered into a partnership with Chinese companies, in particular for the construction of basic infrastructure against the exploitation of deposits used for this purpose.
A joint venture had been created, SICOMINE to manage the interests of two parties.
Only then, after several years of implementation of this contract and exploitation of Congolese resources, the General Inspectorate of Finance comes to the conclusion that the resources of the Republic have been sold off and squandered against minimal achievements.
In the IGF report, the Chinese side has already exploited mineral resources worth 10 billion US dollars while the infrastructure built in return is valued at around 800 million dollars only and its impact is not visible.
To do this, the IGF simply recommends revisiting them.
"It is a question that the agency responsible for monitoring this program can begin a process that will lead to the revisiting of this agreement.
The glaring imbalance that has been observed, the selling off, the squandering of our minerals observed in this contract has been also the work of many misguided sons of our country who have accompanied Chinese companies in this macabre work against our country.
So now, by the will of His Excellency the President of the Republic, Head of State, the process is set in motion through the agency so that there is a rebalancing of the gains, advantages and charges in this agreement.
The DRC has made deposits available to the convention; deposits whose value is estimated at more than 90 billion USD.
Regarding the constitution of the company Sicomines, the DRC only had 32% of the shares while the Chinese part monopolized 68% for an undervalued capital of 100 million USD.
On the other hand, in the operation of this agreement, Chinese companies have already received a gain estimated at nearly 10 billion USD, while the DRC has only benefited from 822 million in terms of infrastructure.
Will it be necessary in the 822 million that we enter in depth to realize that there is no visibility of these 822 million", denounced Jules Alingete, inspector general, head of service of the IGF.
To convince us of the correctness of its argument, Alingete cites the example of the Cinquantenaire hospital, which is found in infrastructures of the order of 114 million USD when everyone knows that this hospital already existed and that it it was just a finalization that was done.
mediacongo
*To Remind,
View attachment 29821
Love the way the Chinese Embassy Embassy is commenting on contracts between Congolese government and supposedly independent Chinese companies.*To add, I see where Old China ain't Happy Jan, as
Chinese contract: the IGF report is not "credible", retorts the Chinese Embassy
We regret to note that the report, whose content is full of prejudice, does not correspond to reality, cannot be considered credible and has no constructive value”.
It is in these terms that the Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Democratic Republic of Congo reacted this Friday, February 17, following the publication of a report by the General Inspectorate of Finance (IGF) denouncing a "imbalance" in the contract signed between the Congolese government and the group of Chinese companies, in the management of certain natural resources of the DRC.
According to the spokesman of the Chinese Embassy, "many tangible achievements prove that the Congolese side has effectively benefited from this cooperation".
The collaboration agreement between the Congolese government and the group of Chinese companies was signed in 2008 and gave rise in particular to the creation of a joint Sino-Congolese company, Sicomines.
Based on an agreement supposed to lead to a “natural resources against infrastructures” program, Sicomines was launched with a share capital of 100 million dollars.
According to the conclusions of the IGF report, this amount was simply disproportionate to the corporate purpose of the joint venture.
He believes that everything is unbalanced and that from the outset it was necessary to assess the contributions of mineral deposits made by Gecamines and this imbalance continued in operations, said the Inspector General of Finance, Jules Alingete, in his report.
Below is the reaction of the Chinese Embassy in the DRC:
View attachment 29930
View attachment 29931
View attachment 29932
I used to have the notion that Zijin could have that 15% and we move on, but it certainly wouldnt be for fuck all, they would have to pay full price...........but since reading about the black mail letter Zijin sent to Cominiere, i have now acquired a vindictive streak, would now like to see ZIJIN / CHINA exposed as the biggest corruptors thru the highest court in the world.....ICC , APRIL 2023, 2 months away.Yes agree Carlos, odd thing for Klaus to say ; I reckon if AJNs application was withdrawn it would probably suggest that the state was trying to dull down this Cominiere (state) bullshite ; Cominiere accept Zijins offer, use the partitioning to slide the Zijin problem (15%) out of Dathcom and give them the North , which would result also in the 15% going back to cominiere who’d kindly offering it up to AVZ under ROFR...state owned Cominiere getting 29%..wow all sorted...win win for the incompetent !
obviously not the greatest for AVZ, with North being the antidote....imo the North has clearly been the stalling issue with AVZ claiming they didn't renounce the project, but agreeing to it falling back under an Exploration licence under Dathcom I.e not required to apply for it again.
With the reasoning behind the waiver not actually following the mining code ; I suspect that MoM was trying / hoping to force AVZ to the table and end their fight for the North..MoM I assume that she would have known, from the first mention of this reasoning, knew that it wasn't in line with the mining code....
Nigels response as per your post - paraphrasing -'Nah get fucked cunts you're just making shit up the initial decrees still stand according to the mining code'
Yes agree; the response was with sniper precision I reckon ; I don't think it left MoM with much movement ; it's backed her up into a corner imo..but we can see that's she's made a move outside the code....ive never had an issue with MoM, I considered her an allie ; I've heard before that the Chinese we're putting pressure on her to just take the north..this rolled on to just cancelling Dathoms licence, but she's hardline batted then back everytime......but now it appears that she's to ready to take a few shortcuts and deviate..she could well just be using the excuse that it was only ‘partially’ waivered with an intent to push the stalemate forward and only trying to get parties to the table in order to agree on a resolution so as to move forward with the Manono lithium project and she wasn't acting outside the code....but Dathcoms president NF has taken a clear stance, so it appears we’re at a point where something has got to give / break....will Nigels comment basically saying no legal issues around the split be an angle MoM / CAMi / state will now try and leverage off?
I think we’re at the pointy end now where they won't wanna go to ICC and we need to get this project moving ; AJN application in the bin....at this stage is be happy enough to let Zijin run with the 15% and for Dathcom to pull in the north under exploitation ; Zijin get 15% in a potential 2 billion tonne resource for fuck all and mining codes adhered to; give the DRC an extra 5% and move on....