AVZ Discussion 2022

[Ashlee]

At the roadshow it was mentioned that the north contained higher Mica. There was also a very clear point made that the vast majority of our CURRENT value was in Roche, basically saying loosing the north would not effect our current value much. At the time I felt this was a clear message to prepare ourselves to lose the north, but all will still be OK. Did others who heard this get the same impression? It sounded very deliberate and was not just a passing comment or off the cuff remark. I spoke to other share holders afterwards, most of which didn't take much notice of this information.

Jazz yes I agree with your summation I was some what surprised by Nigel’s high Micra comments

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

Have we seen the document where AVZ allegedly renounces the northern section?

No, 8196 is the document we are looking for.

 

[Thunderpony]

Yeah but I'm not sure how to implement the code into a website. It's currently working locally in my browsers.
I ttred it on a Wordpress Free page but WordPress strips out half the code cos they don't allow java script on free sites.
So it borks the script.

Happy to hear some ideas if anyone has any.

Ask ChatGTP?

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

View attachment 29421 View attachment 29422 View attachment 29423 View attachment 29424 View attachment 29425 View attachment 29426

We probably shouldn't ask how you got these right? Haha

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

No, 8196 is the document we are looking for.

View attachment 29444

This isn’t quite it (but thank you anyway). Where’s a the document with a signature at the bottom from an authorised AVZ representative?

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

We probably shouldn't ask how you got these right? Haha

The Cadastre has a record-keeping role and has to make these documents available as per the Mining Code (or was it the Mining Regs? Either/Or).

 

[Samus]

a subsidiary of Zijin Mining, accused of serious human rights violations in Kolwezi (Report) with this they want to replace
@AvzMinerals
in Manono with corruption? Unbearable

@Presidence_RDC
@LukondeSama
@MINES_CD

 

[Thunderpony]

 

[Thunderpony]

So Felix is a Key Executive?

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

Apropos of nothing, when Mr Inappropriate gets a like from @Mr Clean, Mr Inappropriate gets a little tingle in his nutsack.

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

The Cadastre has a record-keeping role and has to make these documents available as per the Mining Code (or was it the Mining Regs? Either/Or).

The letter from Zijin states its confidential?

 

[ptlas]

There's that crane with the sick green rims, good to see it made it off the truck.

P. S. Fuck Zijin and there grubby tactics, I'm over it. Give them the North, give us our ML, open to market again get this dog to $1.50 + so I can get the fuck out with a big CGT payment and still have the mortgage to pay.

P. P. S. Fuck Felix and the DRC being open for investment preaching, the only thing that's open is their own pockets and pie holes.

This ain't gonna end for a while.
Reading this thread tonight, I was once again struck by the quality of the posts and the intelligence and ingenuity of many here.
So hang on in there Disco and keep up your positive contributions.

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

This isn’t quite it (but thank you anyway). Where’s a the document with a signature at the bottom from an authorised AVZ representative?

Document 8196 is the application that was submitted to renouncement of the Northern section.

Sorry thought that was what you were after.

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

No, 8196 is the document we are looking for.

View attachment 29444

Sorry the part i was referring to is translated below.

"Having regard to Declaration No 8196 of the partial surrender of the Research Permit No.
13359 submitted by DATHCOM MINING SA dated 01/04/2022"

 

[Carlos Danger]

No, 8196 is the document we are looking

This isn’t quite it (but thank you anyway). Where’s a the document with a signature at the bottom from an authorised AVZ representative?

Sammy is correct. The initial decree states that the partial waiver by Dathcom was made in declaration no 8196. That is the document we are looking for.

 

[Jazz]

Jazz yes I agree with your summation I was some what surprised by Nigel’s high Micra comments

Ashlee, I think the reason it struck me was that for a number of years Nigel had spoken about the north with great excitement and expectation. To hear him talk it down for no particular reason was significant. Particularly as it wasn’t due to it being forced out of him by tough questioning.

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

The letter from Zijin states its confidential?

The marking doesn’t make it so - not in Australia at least. I’m unaware of the local laws (which are usually scrupulously applied…).

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

Sammy is correct. The initial decree states that the partial waiver by Dathcom was made in declaration no 8196. That is the document we are looking for.
View attachment 29447

Yup thanks mate. We need to see who from Dathcom signed this off.

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

The marking doesn’t make it so - not in Australia at least. I’m unaware of the local laws (which are usually scrupulously applied…).

 

[Carlos Danger]

Sorry the part i was referring to is translated below.

"Having regard to Declaration No 8196 of the partial surrender of the Research Permit No.
13359 submitted by DATHCOM MINING SA dated 01/04/2022"

Ironic that it was submitted on April fools day