GrAI Matter competition?
Like others, I came across some impressive numbers from GrAI Matter, so decided to look into what they are and if they are serious competitors.
I can see that it was earlier mentioned that GrAI Matter doesnĀ“t sell IP, which is probably not correct, at least not anymore:
View attachment 24193
Brainchip has four IP Vendors:
- Rensas
- Megachips
- ARM
- Intel
Where GrAI Matter Labs has listed two:
I think itĀ“s very attractive to get into the Synopsys ecosystem and I expect that Synopsys would find it attractive to have Brainchip too, because of the key advantages of Akida.
Key differences
Diogenese have explained some of the key differences between GrAI Matter and Akida from Brainchip
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-2022.1/post-20384
https://semiengineering.com/spiking-neural-networks-research-projects-or-commercial-products/
It seems like Akida is ahead in regards to working independently from the Internet, learning on the edge and can also do recognition with high probability with just 4 bits, where GrAI matter have decided on 8 or 16 bits, which is costing a lot more compute resources and apparently, they are more limited with regards to input and needs to compare pixels from picture to picture. On the other hand, the GrAI VIP has 18 million neurons and it might not matter so much in regards to power consumption that the die is bigger, when itĀ“s a spiking neural network and itĀ“s not using energy while inactive.
Overall I think we have too few details and there are to big differences in how they are working, to really say which chip is the better neuromorphic processor. Most likely they are going to have each their strengths and might both have niches that theyāll dominate and have some areas they overlap. From the few details I have seen, it seems like Akida is much better suited for the edge and thatĀ“s the most interesting market to break through in.
I read somewhere that GrAI Matter Labs initially didnĀ“t focus on the edge, but since have changed their focus.
Popularity
To get a better idea of the popularity of the two chips, I did some searches and it seems like Brainchip is factors more exposed on the web, which can of course partly be explained by a very big and active investor group, which GrAI Matter canĀ“t have as they are a private company.
āGrAI Matterā returns 94 results in
Google search engine
View attachment 24194
āBrainchipā returns 286.000 results in
Google search engine, but of course some also write about "Brainchip" regarding Neuralink which is a misconception, but I think the result is clear anyway.
View attachment 24195
Google Trends show that GrAI Matter was trending back in Googles infancy, but now it appears that nobody really searches for it, while Brainchip is much more popular.
View attachment 24196
I also looked at domain traffic with Semrush and I donĀ“t know how reliable those data are, but it seems like there are some organic traffic for GrAI Matter. Brainchip has almost 22 times more organic traffic, but this could be explained by a large and active investors group.
View attachment 24197
View attachment 24198
After looking into it, my feeling is that GrAI matter does have something going for it, they are integrated with two IP vendors, but they probably have to do a lot more marketing to really break through and they will probably find it hard to compete with Akida on the edge.