A little bit of googling yields a bit of results.
See the latest work and learn more about Tom Richardson, author and daily contributor to The Motley Fool Australia.
www.fool.com.au
Not sure of the following website is him : but the username is uncanny.
Side note - if he purports that he had emailed avz a few days prior to the report (which avz was well in their rights andc correctly should have done )
That means that Tommy received the info earlier than it was published on the boatman report (if that is the same matter he is referring to) ... Meaning he got that info from a source direct.
Suspicious, if anything.
"Side note - if he purports that he had emailed avz a few days prior to the report (which avz was well in their rights andc correctly should have done )
That means that Tommy received the info earlier than it was published on the boatman report (if that is the same matter he is referring to) ... Meaning he got that info from a source direct."
That is not my reading at all of his tweet
I don't think he is purporting to have emailed AVZ beforehand at all
My reading is as follows
There was a short report prepared by boatman. That report was provided (by someone) to AVZ some days prior to publishing with 6 questions asked which AVZ could respond to
AVZ did not respond in any way to the queries within some precribed timeframe so then the report was published
Doesn't mean Tommy got the info before hand.....he's reporting after the fact what transpired
Maybe he got the report direct from boatman at the same time the report and the queries were sent to AVZ but I don't necessairly think he's saying that...... and I certainly don't think he's saying "he" emailed AVZ prior to the release of the Boatman Report
Also I'm confused and not sure who you are inferring the "direct source" for little Tommy might be????
Boatman??? Someone at AVZ??? Anyone else????
Of course other people may form a different view