My thought was immediately the EIB calls Talga on the 14th and the 15th and and. And then she calls the court: what's the situation, we've been standing over the buzzer here since the 14th, at least give us an indication if there's a showstopper.
MT words I have nothing to add. We should look at it positively. As noted, the warehouse is full of material to start up.
The EU is going ahead - though not as much as hoped - making the decision easier for the others. Besides the Nordic ones, there's also the Swiss thing. Just comes to mind that this may be the reason that Talga is now also listed in Switzerland.
And do I understand it correctly that this is first the template of the EU and that will be finalized when the financing with the other banks is approved? So the EIB keeps the option open to bridge a possible gap at the end and give more if the required amount is not met?
Whatever. For the time being, I take a very positive view and stick to MT's words. It is an important milestone and now it can go into the execution phase.
Who of us expected money before the decision of the court?
To me it feels like there is no showstopper but things that can be handled. But the whole funding thing is not my spot so all just my feeling.
The other issue with Botnia: I wouldn't try to draw comparisons. Every case I heard about was unique. And Talga is the first case ever that fits into Sweden's new role of responsibility for green transition.
The howls about Kallak are still loud. But this is about the new green Tec.
What do you think of the wording? Is the EU fulfilling its role and rounding out the package if something is still missing? They have enough money.
___
In addition, there is the end of the fiscal year and the shorts are also still in the room. Good ann.
