Agree entirely but the system is flawed and abused. I never had a true career criminal client who was not also receiving government benefits of some form. Why not it is a nice little earner and takes little time to put in place when you are happy to lie and can thereby manipulate the system. One family enterprise of parents and two brothers a real case. The brothers did Break Enter and Steal as their primary occupation and had been arrested a number of times over the years. They shared the carer duties of their two parents and received carers pensions. Their father was on long term Workers Compensation benefits and their mother on sickness benefits. When they came to me they had been arrested again for a series of break and enters which in accordance with their previous form they could not have possibly committed unless there was DNA or fingerprint evidence as they were with their parents all night. The brief of evidence was served and of course there was DNA evidence so their alibi defence was abandoned immediately and they then wanted to rely upon their carers duties as being a reason they should not go inside again. They moved on at that time when they were told they would have to pay my fees as legal aid would not provide a private solicitor grant and used the legal aid solicitor again paid for by your taxes. They were all young enough that they would be now able to take advantage of the NDIS scheme. Experience makes some of us very cynical as to the ability of the system to help those who both you and I know need such assistance.
FF.
I'm sure the system is abused and understand that cynicism develops amongst those caught up in it and in those trying to assist.
It is often notably present in medical practitioners too.
I guess I view it similarly to any system or process whether in nature or by design, in that, none of them are perfect and all are subject, at the least, ultimately to entropy.
Lights produce heat as an unwanted by-product of their function, many suffer and die, apparently randomly, in nature, as evolution enhances a species adaptability to changing environments. I don't expect systems to perform flawlessly or without waste or inequities, and even though it may be considered a Pollyannaeristic view I merely
hope for better things for all of us. But I recognise it as such, and would not knowingly put my hand in a lions mouth expecting other than to be bitten.
We do what we can for others, accepting that there will always be the poor and sick and unwise amongst us.
I am sure you have managed much good in your time as evidenced by your contributions here and though we oft rage against the machine, for some, wisdom comes as by-product of our being.
Thank you for what you have done for the greater good.

GLTAH