Now there is a lie for them to run with universal income. They could claim to be paying the dole to 300 million low income earners on distant planets around the universe how would we ever audit it. LOLI'm all for a universal income ...
for those over 65.
Same with driving licences.
I have just retired recently too, after 46 years in the workforce and am also self funded but don't think I'd be very "happy" trying to survive on $40 a day. For some people circumstances are just hard and sometimes "things" just turn bad. From my perspective I want there to be a decent safety net available for "hard times" which can befall any of us. I have had need of it at a certain point in my life and benefited from it, although found it to be very poorly administered at the time. I worked my way out of that situation but only through "knowing someone" who gave me a much needed break, allowing me an opportunity which I seized and ran with. I don't want a dog eat dog society that just spawns more problems. We have evolved beyond that. GLTAHI've retired self funded but why work when you can "have nothing and be happy" on the roll
That cannot be because our political leaders on both sides of the house have for decades now since we floated the dollar told us that these nice people who come here on holiday do not take our jobs they simply perform the jobs that Australian residents will not perform (for cash and below award wages - I added this bit) and that they bring us billions in tourist dollars so I don't think this person you listened too knew what they were talking about. If they are correct then this would mean our politicians have been untruthful and have misled the electorate time and time and time again.
We the Australian electorate may not be mushrooms but I know what we are forced to eat.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Agree entirely but the system is flawed and abused. I never had a true career criminal client who was not also receiving government benefits of some form. Why not it is a nice little earner and takes little time to put in place when you are happy to lie and can thereby manipulate the system. One family enterprise of parents and two brothers a real case. The brothers did Break Enter and Steal as their primary occupation and had been arrested a number of times over the years. They shared the carer duties of their two parents and received carers pensions. Their father was on long term Workers Compensation benefits and their mother on sickness benefits. When they came to me they had been arrested again for a series of break and enters which in accordance with their previous form they could not have possibly committed unless there was DNA or fingerprint evidence as they were with their parents all night. The brief of evidence was served and of course there was DNA evidence so their alibi defence was abandoned immediately and they then wanted to rely upon their carers duties as being a reason they should not go inside again. They moved on at that time when they were told they would have to pay my fees as legal aid would not provide a private solicitor grant and used the legal aid solicitor again paid for by your taxes. They were all young enough that they would be now able to take advantage of the NDIS scheme. Experience makes some of us very cynical as to the ability of the system to help those who both you and I know need such assistance.I have just retired recently too, after 46 years in the workforce and am also self funded but don't think I'd be very "happy" trying to survive on $40 a day. For some people circumstances are just hard and sometimes "things" just turn bad. From my perspective I want there to be a decent safety net available for "hard times" which can befall any of us. I have had need of it at a certain point in my life and benefited from it, although found it to be very poorly administered at the time. I worked my way out of that situation but only through "knowing someone" who gave me a much needed break, allowing me an opportunity which I seized and ran with. I don't want a dog eat dog society that just spawns more problems. We have evolved beyond that. GLTAH
So now you're unmasked as Rumpole.Agree entirely but the system is flawed and abused. I never had a true career criminal client who was not also receiving government benefits of some form. Why not it is a nice little earner and takes little time to put in place when you are happy to lie and can thereby manipulate the system. One family enterprise of parents and two brothers a real case. The brothers did Break Enter and Steal as their primary occupation and had been arrested a number of times over the years. They shared the carer duties of their two parents and received carers pensions. Their father was on long term Workers Compensation benefits and their mother on sickness benefits. When they came to me they had been arrested again for a series of break and enters which in accordance with their previous form they could not have possibly committed unless there was DNA or fingerprint evidence as they were with their parents all night. The brief of evidence was served and of course there was DNA evidence so their alibi defence was abandoned immediately and they then wanted to rely upon their carers duties as being a reason they should not go inside again. They moved on at that time when they were told they would have to pay my fees as legal aid would not provide a private solicitor grant and used the legal aid solicitor again paid for by your taxes. They were all young enough that they would be now able to take advantage of the NDIS scheme. Experience makes some of us very cynical as to the ability of the system to help those who both you and I know need such assistance.
FF.
No not a lot of fiction in the works of John Mortimer that is why I loved Rumpole and refuse to watch most Australian police shows well actually all of them much to my wife's annoyance but she accepts that this is better than my constant corrections of the script. LOLSo now you're unmasked as Rumpole.
And we thought John Mortimer was making it all up.
I'm sure the system is abused and understand that cynicism develops amongst those caught up in it and in those trying to assist.Agree entirely but the system is flawed and abused. I never had a true career criminal client who was not also receiving government benefits of some form. Why not it is a nice little earner and takes little time to put in place when you are happy to lie and can thereby manipulate the system. One family enterprise of parents and two brothers a real case. The brothers did Break Enter and Steal as their primary occupation and had been arrested a number of times over the years. They shared the carer duties of their two parents and received carers pensions. Their father was on long term Workers Compensation benefits and their mother on sickness benefits. When they came to me they had been arrested again for a series of break and enters which in accordance with their previous form they could not have possibly committed unless there was DNA or fingerprint evidence as they were with their parents all night. The brief of evidence was served and of course there was DNA evidence so their alibi defence was abandoned immediately and they then wanted to rely upon their carers duties as being a reason they should not go inside again. They moved on at that time when they were told they would have to pay my fees as legal aid would not provide a private solicitor grant and used the legal aid solicitor again paid for by your taxes. They were all young enough that they would be now able to take advantage of the NDIS scheme. Experience makes some of us very cynical as to the ability of the system to help those who both you and I know need such assistance.
FF.
Sorry I switched off after a short time. I have been jaded by the system.Something for you to either watch or listen too @Fact Finder
AI in Law Enforcement – presented by Monash Tech Talks
www.monash.edu
I recall somewhere Sean saying the business would be a net user of revenue until 2025, perhaps in relation to funding sources such as LDA. I may have injected my thinking into this so take with a grain of salt - but if it was accurate then something would have had to change to make it breakeven in 2022 or even 2023. I'm hopeful of more revenue in the next quarterly but still don't expect to shoot the lights out until 2024.I am not dealing with your numbers simply the alternative logic. You are assuming he intended to convey that the revenue would be sufficient to make this current year break even.
The alternative view is he was intending to imply that the income which was being received by day 255 projected forward for 2023 would create break even.
For what it’s worth this was my impression 2023 is the true going concern year.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Hi HoppyI have just retired recently too, after 46 years in the workforce and am also self funded but don't think I'd be very "happy" trying to survive on $40 a day. For some people circumstances are just hard and sometimes "things" just turn bad. From my perspective I want there to be a decent safety net available for "hard times" which can befall any of us. I have had need of it at a certain point in my life and benefited from it, although found it to be very poorly administered at the time. I worked my way out of that situation but only through "knowing someone" who gave me a much needed break, allowing me an opportunity which I seized and ran with. I don't want a dog eat dog society that just spawns more problems. We have evolved beyond that. GLTAH
Thanks Dang Son.Hi Hoppy
"Have nothing and be happy " is a catch phrase from The Great Reset Movement
$40 per day couldn't sustain my consumption and I can't think of anyone in this country that it would .
For that movement and catch phrase to work it would have to come from a socialist base and provide for everyone's every need.
I think it's a futuristic concept coming from The World Economic Forum, that can't happen till Akida's everywhere doing the all heavy lifting.
Had some good news....today I heard that the company is going to follow-up on that lead I served up,
I'll keep you posted if I hear anything positive over the coming months. www.orbai.ai/about-us
Please accept my apologies, something has come up, so I have decided to delay our little get-together for coffee/tea until later in the year...it's all cool.
But on the bright side, I have been invited to visit the new offices of the Research and Innovation Centre in June/July, as the company is moving to bigger premises (for less rent) as the brains trust expands.....(I assume).
Hope to be able to take some photos of the Perth team's new work environment, with Peters permission...stay tuned.
Go ANZACS.....Tech
I am sure that the words ‘net user of revenue’ were used by Sean Hehir. I cannot tell you which of his presentations but it was fairly recent.I recall somewhere Sean saying the business would be a net user of revenue until 2025, perhaps in relation to funding sources such as LDA. I may have injected my thinking into this so take with a grain of salt - but if it was accurate then something would have had to change to make it breakeven in 2022 or even 2023. I'm hopeful of more revenue in the next quarterly but still don't expect to shoot the lights out until 2024.
Of course, our SP should move ahead of a 2024 revenue explosion so I'm still excited under my scenario above.
I think AKD500 will be where real revenue will reign...I am sure that the words ‘net user of revenue’ were used by Sean Hehir. I cannot tell you which of his presentations but it was fairly recent.
But I am not sure what it means as we know Brainchip has a complete commitment to continuing to drive its lead by research and development.
I get the impression that a lot of money will be channeled into Perth to keep the five to six year lead for AKD3000 so income could be growing but being spent in this area.
I have the impression that AKD3000 might surface all going well in 2024 if so 2025 makes sense for when they outstrip expenditure.
My son-in-law recently needed to hire another Data Scientist and to get the right person with experience he had to pay them more than he receives which worked out OK because the CEO increased his salary to establish parity.
The point is though that across the whole semiconductor space the right people are harder and harder to get so Peter’s end of the business is going to eat up cash at greater rates than it has in the past on salaries.
There is so much global demand the right people are thinking of a number, doubling it and then demanding more.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA