BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
It always amazes me that people want to blame phantom manipulators...
The only people manipulating this stock are our management, by their lack of transparency and information.
BrainChip choose to operate in a vacuum. They could support the share price, with proper communication (without breaching any ASX regulations) but they actively choose not too.
The blame lies well and truly at the feet of management, no one else....
Last edited:
Love the image of people walking out of the meliana movie on a plane.
Tothemoon24
Top 20
How on earth people can blame anyone but the company for our low share price is beyond me , our quarterly statement presented the smallest of
steps forward & zero to support or suggest that substantial revenue is approaching.
Sean should keep his mouth shut
his ridiculous statement has done more harm than good , simply laughable & a prime example of how removed he is from the market’s & share holders expectations.
There’s plenty happening in the edge tech space & Brainchips technology isn’t being required!!
steps forward & zero to support or suggest that substantial revenue is approaching.
Sean should keep his mouth shut
his ridiculous statement has done more harm than good , simply laughable & a prime example of how removed he is from the market’s & share holders expectations.There’s plenty happening in the edge tech space & Brainchips technology isn’t being required!!
Yeah I understand your point but what many people clearly don’t understand… and what I have pointed out many times in this forum …is that a company like BrainChip does not care about coffee-chat gossip or torch-and-pitchfork mentality.
People can make as many pseudo-demands as they want. If management decides it is necessary, they will execute a reverse split. Period. And then 90% of retail shareholders will be gone automatically, because small positions get wiped out if they fall below minimum thresholds.
The remaining people will be sitting there with 10–50 shares, down 70–80%, and will continue complaining about BrainChip and management.
Accept reality…Everyone here is investing at their own risk. Me included.
Management does everything that is legally possible and releases only the information they are required to release or choose to release under regulatory rules.
Yes, I also have an issue with the lack of communication channels and the fact that there is practically no dialogue with retail investors.
But that is my personal disappointment, because I expected more.
And now to the big illusion…
You really think changing the CEO will improve the situation?
Good luck with the next CEO.
Let’s see how long it takes before people start complaining again.
One week?
One month?
Only my Opinion
gilti
Regular
Don't you realise that over 25m shorts have been taken out in Jan alone.
table attached from the ASX Daily Gross Short Sales
They are using these shares to manipulate the market.
It is insidious and has been going on for years.
Management can't announce nonexistent information.
Yes communication could be improved but the shorter ar*eholes should be strangled
table attached from the ASX Daily Gross Short Sales
They are using these shares to manipulate the market.
It is insidious and has been going on for years.
Management can't announce nonexistent information.
Yes communication could be improved but the shorter ar*eholes should be strangled
2/01/2026 | 150,469 |
5/01/2026 | 482,384 |
6/01/2026 | 596,294 |
7/01/2026 | 283,459 |
8/01/2026 | 1,883,397 |
9/01/2026 | 680,750 |
12/01/2026 | 2,704,830 |
13/01/2026 | 868,138 |
14/01/2026 | 667,279 |
15/01/2026 | 730,588 |
16/01/2026 | 934,410 |
19/01/2026 | 3,351,111 |
20/01/2026 | 1,454,507 |
21/01/2026 | 1,450,495 |
22/01/2026 | 961,097 |
23/01/2026 | 1,677,074 |
26/01/2026 | |
27/01/2026 | 969,221 |
28/01/2026 | 2,243,111 |
29/01/2026 | 3,179,760 |
| TOTAL 25,268,374 |
Tothemoon24
Top 20
What I realise is if the company was progressing the shorts wouldn’t be playing such a hard game , they have no fear due to the lack of market traction.
If the company didn’t have to constantly borrow money to stay afloat, there wouldn’t be the abundance of shares available to short .
Hi TTM,
The ASX has no way of evaluating not just the potential, but the very real technical advantages of Akida/TENNs. PvdM's original revolutionary concept of a silicon SNN, itself a worldbeater, has been improved on by TENNs. Chris Eliasmith (ABR_) applied converging orthogonal polynomials (don't ask me!) in software (genius). Rudy and Olivier implemented it in silicon - again pure genius.
Implementing these functions in silicon is much more energy efficient and has much lower latency.
Added to this is the fact that TENNs can operate on smaller models using small MACs (4*4 or 8*8) compared with 16*16 or 32*32, further improving power efficiency. I'm assuming we still also have the N-of-M input (activation) compression from Akida 1.
All these concepts are, of course, second nature to your average Australian day-trader.
It is usual for pre-revenue mineral explorers to be valued on their potential as determined from the drill assays, measured/indicated/inferred.
Given the virtually unlimited future market for AI processors, BRN's "measured" potential could be estimated by comparison with the technical comparison with competitors. At the edge, going on what we know of the competition, Akida/TENNs would appear to be at the top of the pile on the crucial metrics of power consumption, latency and accuracy.
I guess there is some tradeoff between accuracy (bit count) and power efficiency, and that is why we are building a protfolio of products:
pico for ultra-low power,
the 4-bit 1500 for very low power,
the 8-bit Akida 2 for greater precision,
the 16/32 bit Akida 3 for very high precision,
the 32 bit GenAI for "language models" .
We have been forced to develop this portfolio as the market began to realize what it needed from AI.
The market awakening to its needs only began a couple of years ago, so our advances on the technical front have been nothing short of astounding.
In this rapidly evolving market, the marketers have had their work cut out for them, as the customers awoke to their expanding AI needs.
This has left BRN with a lack of viable income in the short term during the market evolution, but when they get to their destination, they'll find us there ready and waiting.
Last edited:
And who enables the shorters with their silence? You can not short a stock that's trending up. Our reliable management enable the shorters, there is absolutely no doubt about it.
There's plenty Brainchip could do (without breaching any ASX regulations) to help support our share price.
Their extensive campaign of silence is creating most of the issues that people are arguing about here and on the other place.
This is not normal behaviour from a listed company.
Go and look at WBT, and see the types of announcements and market updates they are able to provide. BRN can do this, but they CHOOSE not to. Hiding behind their incompetence (and inability) to deal with an ASX issue from over 5 years ago.
Absolutely unbelievable..
It's a shorter's paradise.. and quite frankly I wish I was short...
Food4 thought
Regular
I think it’s almost corrupt that a ceo can say things like that are not true like look at us now and announcements coming out soon when nothing materialises.
Like what the hell if that not helping destroy your bottom line what is.
When will the board who might also be in the same boat who knows do something positive for the company they work for , it like a board at a local RSL club.
Like what the hell if that not helping destroy your bottom line what is.
When will the board who might also be in the same boat who knows do something positive for the company they work for , it like a board at a local RSL club.
DerAktienDude
Regular
It’s really hard to take this complaint seriously.
First, stocks get shorted when a company’s performance is poor and not the other way around. Our performance is awful, and I can’t recall a viable single commercial success besides signing IP licenses. If I remember correctly, our highest revenue was in 2022—four years ago.
Second, these short positions don’t even look bad for a failing company with two billion shares. You can actually be glad they’re this low.
Take a look at the top 100 short positions on the Nasdaq or the S&P 500. Companies with drastically better business models than ours have short interest ratios of 30%, and in extreme cases, up to 90%.
To adress the people that tell us that we're the leader in Edge AI on-chip processing, with no one comming close and complaining about this small market. Here are two examples. 2024 numbers:
NVIDIA: 3,95b USD - Jetson Orin Nano - CUDA Ecosystem
Qualcomm: 2.3b USD - Snapdragon - Mobile SOcs
Now you might say "this is not what Akida does! You can't compare these numbers and use cases!"
Which might be true. The processes differ. That's the reason why they're successfull and we're not.
If we're the leader in on-chip-edge-AI we'd surpass Qualcomm, since this is exactly what they are doing.
That would mean that our revenue would be at least around 2.4b USD - our short quota would look differnet then and so would the share price.
Top Edge AI Market Companies - Rankings, Profiles, SWOT Analysis & Strategic Outlook
Authoritative ranking of the top Edge AI market companies, including revenues, SWOT, regional landscape, and 2025-2031 outlook.
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
You do realise that having a hardware / processor at the cutting edge (pun intended) of a new way of processing is not the same as also having the models and algos needed to run on said hardware / processor, yeah?It’s really hard to take this complaint seriously.
First, stocks get shorted when a company’s performance is poor and not the other way around. Our performance is awful, and I can’t recall a viable single commercial success besides signing IP licenses. If I remember correctly, our highest revenue was in 2022—four years ago.
Second, these short positions don’t even look bad for a failing company with two billion shares. You can actually be glad they’re this low.
Take a look at the top 100 short positions on the Nasdaq or the S&P 500. Companies with drastically better business models than ours have short interest ratios of 30%, and in extreme cases, up to 90%.
To adress the people that tell us that we're the leader in Edge AI on-chip processing, with no one comming close and complaining about this small market. Here are two examples. 2024 numbers:
NVIDIA: 3,95b USD - Jetson Orin Nano - CUDA Ecosystem
Qualcomm: 2.3b USD - Snapdragon - Mobile SOcs
Now you might say "this is not what Akida does! You can't compare these numbers and use cases!"
Which might be true. The processes differ. That's the reason why they're successfull and we're not.
If we're the leader in on-chip-edge-AI we'd surpass Qualcomm, since this is exactly what they are doing.
That would mean that our revenue would be at least around 2.4b USD - our short quota would look differnet then and so would the share price.
Top Edge AI Market Companies - Rankings, Profiles, SWOT Analysis & Strategic Outlook
Authoritative ranking of the top Edge AI market companies, including revenues, SWOT, regional landscape, and 2025-2031 outlook.www.reportprime.com
That's why the NVIDIA and Qualcoms of the world can still push ahead as they are essentially still using and squeezing what they can out of existing tech.
IMO, that is probs one of the bigger challenges. Waiting for the market and industry to catch up by creating said models and algos in scale for various use cases so that the neuromorphic hardware is required.
Industry appears to have acknowledged over the last couple of years how good neuromorphic can be and narrowed down uses cases / specific industries it is particularly beneficial to, like defence and space and extreme edge automation and robotics etc.
Now, the models, tool chains, algos and other requisite supporting processes are starting to catch up.
Yeah, def taken longer than most thought, including BRN I reckon, but it's thereabouts this year so yes, the BRN Team need lock away some tangibles this year.
Do you have this from inside sources that a reverse split is coming, or are you a short seller trying to pour gasoline on the fire to profit from the chaos?
Because if you’re not certain…and if it’s not actually on the table…I’d suggest you use wording like “I suspect…” or “in my opinion…”. Otherwise it’s just as manipulative as the kind of behavior you criticize yourself.
Investig8ed
Regular
Yes
Jacob Kiraz
Regular
Up ramperGidday All,
I felt the 4C and update from the previous quarter was fairly presented, 408,000 USD while small, it's better than in the
0-100,000 USD range.
Outgoings were down across a number of areas, so you can't really comment in the negative, or can you? probably some can.
And by the way, my post yesterday needed to be read in context, I could feel the frustration (anger) having read the posts being
posted, my own position is currently at say the 50% frustration level, not anger, for a variety of reasons.
I can say that I personally like how we are currently positioned, product wise, chip wise, client wise, timing edge AI wise, patent
wise, financial wise, engineering support wise and so on.
Dare I mention it, revenue, with that everything feels like it will fall into place for us, but, but, but ...........
Tech
Jacob Kiraz
Regular
14.5 I warned you lot,
I read with interesr a Ceo should be in trouble by saying thus far some untruths, Watch us now and a annoucemet is near, Exciting tomes
I read with interesr a Ceo should be in trouble by saying thus far some untruths, Watch us now and a annoucemet is near, Exciting tomes
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
Well I'm disappointed now TC
I had to record it to watch later as I'm out....guess I won't bother now knowing the result
Dad humour....
Oh, I truly am sorry. Didn’t think of that! I won’t mention the next men’s result tonight.Well I'm disappointed now TC
I had to record it to watch later as I'm out....guess I won't bother now knowing the result
Dad humour....
Similar threads
