Thanks @Diogenese for indulging me. You always add value to the subject…. and I knew you’d be all over it!
It’ll be handy to have Qualcomm provide a mass market revenue stream for us!
Cheers !
You’re welcome
Thanks @Diogenese for indulging me. You always add value to the subject…. and I knew you’d be all over it!
It’ll be handy to have Qualcomm provide a mass market revenue stream for us!
Cheers !
“And there's a company you may have heard called Nvidia that also trades at 27 times next year's earnings and it's vilified by the press as expensive, but it's grown its earnings also at 27% per annum, whereas those other three companies are growing at 6% per annum collectively.”"
Hi @Fullmoonfever,
I found this October 2024 paper titled “Neuromorphic neuromodulation: Towards the next generation of closed-loop neurostimulation” - co-authored by Omid Kavehei - that describes what the research relating to the NeuroSyd GitHub repository is likely going to be about.
View attachment 83617 View attachment 83618 View attachment 83619 View attachment 83620 View attachment 83621
Does Table 1, where Akida is falsely labeled as analog, seem somehow familiar?!
Turns out it was you who commented on this error after you had spotted that same table in an earlier version of that paper by the same co-authors in August 2023:
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-338409
View attachment 83624
One of the co-authors happens to be Jason Eshraghian, who has been a Member of our Scientific Advisory Board since August 2024 and was a guest on one of the “This is Our Mission” podcasts shortly after the above 2024 paper was submitted (3 May 2024). I trust he has since found out that Akida is digital.
A corrigendum would have been nice, though.
But maybe he is too busy with other things, such as collaborating with Intel Labs’ researchers on this recent paper titled “Neuromorphic Principles for Efficient Large Language Models on Intel Loihi 2”?
View attachment 83626
Found a brand new University of Sydney PhD thesis, which is highly likely related to the GitHub “Akida Seizure” repository that one of the two thesis supervisors, Omid Kavehei, had set up under the GitHub name NeuroSyd just over two months ago (which seems to have disappeared since or has possibly been renamed?), spotted by @Fullmoonfever at the time.
Discovery
www.sydney.edu.au
View attachment 88203
University of Sydney PhD candidate Andre Zainal, who has a B.Eng. (Biomedical) & B.MedSci background, embarked on his Research PhD in Biomedical Engineering just a week ago, “researching AI-driven neuromorphic hardware for early seizure detection”.
The title of his thesis is “Optimizing Training Algorithms for Neuromorphic Hardware: Enhancing In-Memory Computing with FPGA and Akida Neural Processors for Epileptic Seizure Detection”.
Akida doesn’t have “in-memory-computing”, though?
View attachment 88204 View attachment 88205 View attachment 88206
Andre Zainal’s first PhD supervisor Omid Kavehei has been conducting epilepsy research for years:
Discovery
www.sydney.edu.au
View attachment 88210
View attachment 88212
View attachment 88213
(…)
View attachment 88214
More on Andre Zainal’s two PhD supervisors:
Principal supervisor Omid Kavehei is not only Professor at University of Sydney’s School of Biomedical Engineering, but also Director and Founder of BrainConnect (https://brainconnect.com.au/), the stealth startup “developing novel solutions in long-term interfacing with the brain and body”, where co-supervisor Duy Nhan Truong works as Engineering Lead.
Prior to filling that position, Duy Nhan Truong also used to be at University of Sydney, initially as a PhD student in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (transferred from RMIT University in 2018, PhD thesis completed in 2020, titled “Epileptic Seizure Detection and Forecasting Ecosystems”, principal supervisor: Omid Kavehei; https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/handle/2123/21932/truong_nd_thesis.pdf?) and later as a postdoc.
View attachment 88215
View attachment 88216
![]()
Duy Nhan Truong - BrainConnect Pty Ltd | LinkedIn
I bring over 7 years of experience in electronics development for medical devices… · Experience: BrainConnect Pty Ltd · Education: University of Sydney · Location: Sydney · 492 connections on LinkedIn. View Duy Nhan Truong’s profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members.www.linkedin.com
View attachment 88217
View attachment 88218
View attachment 88219
![]()
View attachment 88220 View attachment 88221
Sorry I thought I was answering your question…who owns the patent? no mention of BrainChip in the post ?
Interestingly chat boxes are more human like than we think after all everything they access is originates from us warts and all. The warts being out of date or incorrect information.Seriously? Did you even use a proper search engine (if yes, which one?) or merely consult ChatGPT to help you source the original source?
(The LLM may obviously have had a “motive” to deflect from the MIT researchers’ findings and hence may have falsely claimed no such study existed…)
While the authors of the pre-print published in June 2025 wouldn’t fully agree with the (presumably) AI-generated and in part unfactual* “summary” of their study that @Brainshit’s screenshot shows, the study as such is very real. The paper is titled “Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task” and can easily be found online by googling “MIT study ChatGPT”:
*In the project website’s FAQ section, they distance themselves from sensationalist and too general interpretations of their study (which they freely admit has certain limitations) and from inaccurate terms such as “brain-scans”.
Also, the “83.3 %” refer to the following sentence: “Quoting accuracy was significantly different across experimental conditions (Figure 6). In the LLM‐assisted group, 83.3 % of participants (15/18) failed to provide a correct quotation, whereas only 11.1 % (2/18) in both the Search‐Engine and Brain‐Only groups encountered the same difficulty.”
Pre-print: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08872
View attachment 91554
(…)
View attachment 91555
(…)
View attachment 91556
![]()
Project Overview ‹ Your Brain on ChatGPT – MIT Media Lab
Check project's website: https://www.brainonllm.comWith today's wide adoption of LLM products like ChatGPT from OpenAI, humans and businesses engage and u…www.media.mit.edu
View attachment 91558 View attachment 91559 View attachment 91560 Project website: https://www.brainonllm.com/
LinkedIn post by first author Nataliya Kosmyna:
![]()
How ChatGPT affects your brain and writing | Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D posted on the topic | LinkedIn
𝐍𝐨, 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐋𝐌 𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐋𝐋𝐌 𝐮𝐬𝐞. See our paper for more results: "Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task" (link in the comments). For 4 months, 54 students were divided into three groups...www.linkedin.com
You can also find numerous video interviews with Nataliya Kosmyna online, in which she explains what the study was actually about and what it doesn’t show.
Shocking and sad news: Olivier Coenen’s contract was terminated today…
His post supports my suspicion that something is amiss with our company’s work culture. There have been plenty of signs on LinkedIn over the past 18 months or so.
![]()
#hiring #opentowork #neuralnetworks #ssm #eventbased #airesearch | Olivier Coenen
After two intense weeks (14–19-hour days) and enough material for ~3 more patent filings, my role at BrainChip ended today. What I’m proud of: material for 20+ patents, co-developing PLEIADES (accepted at NeurIPS this year), and co-inventing TENN (Temporal Event Neural Networks) and their...www.linkedin.com
View attachment 91589
Hi Fmf,I see Rudy also posted some info around Pleiades and Centaurus a week ago.
![]()
Happy to share PLEIADES just got a stamp of approval from Neurips 2025! Congratz and thanks to my coauthor Olivier Coenen for making this happen. Pleiades is a sister network to Centaurus. Very… | Rudy Pei
Happy to share PLEIADES just got a stamp of approval from Neurips 2025! Congratz and thanks to my coauthor Olivier Coenen for making this happen. Pleiades is a sister network to Centaurus. Very briefly put, while Centaurus is a new-age SSM, Pleiades is a new-age CNN. The shared basis of both...www.linkedin.com
Rudy Pei
Inference @ NVIDIA | quantum + neuromorphic computing | music
1w Edited
Happy to share PLEIADES just got a stamp of approval from Neurips 2025! Congratz and thanks to my coauthor Olivier Coenen for making this happen. Pleiades is a sister network to Centaurus. Very briefly put, while Centaurus is a new-age SSM, Pleiades is a new-age CNN. The shared basis of both are orthogonal polynomials basis, which has a long history in math and physics (think Sturm-Louisville). Just to recall, Pleiades achieved 100 percent test accuracy of the DVS 128 dataset, and SOTA performance on event-based road scene detection (still SOTA 3 years after we got the initial result!) This is very timely, as now CNNs and SSMs are making a huge comeback in the form of hybrid LLMs. For instance, LFM2 from Liquid AI uses conv layers, and a variant of Qwen3-Next uses gated delta net (again a new-age SSM). So the general sentiment seems to be "while transformers can be all you need, CNNs and SSMs definitely help". I am very fortunate enough to be able to contribute to this space in an "orthogonal" direction Arxiv link https://lnkd.in/gcGT6QHU
Olivier Coenen is "open for work"!!!!!!!!!There will be an assignment agreement in the employment contract to assign the invention to the employer.
As usual US law is a bit different from British-based systems. The Constitution requires the patent to be filed by the inventor and it can then be assigned to the employer, whereas, in our system the patent application is usually filed by the employer.
Key date is the priority date, when the application was first filed.
As Rudy and Olivier were both employees of BRN at the time the invention was made, BRN is the owner.
No doubt they got a lot of bonus shares.
An interesting case may arise if Rudy creates an improvement invention which requires the use of the original TENNs patents. In such a case the improvement invention is subject to the original patent and could not be used without some agreement (licence/cross-licence) with BRN.
Shocking and sad news: Olivier Coenen’s contract was terminated today…
![]()
#hiring #opentowork #neuralnetworks #ssm #eventbased #airesearch | Olivier Coenen
After two intense weeks (14–19-hour days) and enough material for ~3 more patent filings, my role at BrainChip ended today. What I’m proud of: material for 20+ patents, co-developing PLEIADES (accepted at NeurIPS this year), and co-inventing TENN (Temporal Event Neural Networks) and their...www.linkedin.com
View attachment 91589
His post supports my suspicion that something is amiss with our company’s work culture. There have been plenty of signs on LinkedIn over the past 18 months or so, some of which I addressed in earlier posts.
Like a few other forum members, I also found it concerning when Olivier Coenen posted the following after Rudy Pei had left our company, as to me this was definitely to be read as criticism of management:
![]()
Why talent and expertise are crucial for innovation | Olivier Coenen posted on the topic | LinkedIn
On the Importance of Talent and Expertise in Innovation When developing pioneering technologies, intellectual property (IP) often appears as a clear path toward innovation and competitive advantage. At my previous startup, Qelzal Corporation, our VC investors recognized the potential of our...www.linkedin.com
View attachment 91590
The event-camera hand image even looked as if the author were waving goodbye.
So I was very relieved when Olivier Coenen stayed on and when I later discovered on LinkedIn that he actually served as the PI for the AFRL project.
Which makes it all the more shocking to me that he actually got fired while this project is still running!
View attachment 91591
There was a lot of staff turnover in the last 12 months... a bit too much, in my opinion.
Hi Fangipani, any theories in relation to staff retention at BRN?
I agree. We can speculate all we want.We do not know why they are letting him go!
We are immediately judging the company, but maybe it is also he who made a major mistake?
He had access to a lot of internal and technical information and secrets, so everything is possible. Or did he have a major fight with Sean and was disrespectful? He clearly said it: THEY are letting him go! There must be a reason for this.
Btw, he knew something like this was coming because he announced it yesterday already. So it was no surprise to him, so I see the problem on his side.
If it is not his fault, whose is it? We will never know. Nobody will tell us.
You should send this to the New York Times. If you push hard enough to get your message out you could generate enough doubt to really spook investors. We love a low share price.Indeed.
In fact, last night I actually drew up a list of people who have left our company over the past 18 months or so - many of them in senior positions - as I was going to reply to @manny100’s question…
…in reaction to my earlier statement “But joking aside, from my perspective our company evidently has a problem with retaining staff - and I personally don’t think the lure of a bigger pay package somewhere else is the main reason for the high staff turnover.”
The context was sharing the news that both Richard Resseguie and Richard Chevalier had recently left our company, shortly after we had also lost our VP of Global Sales Steve Thorne…
Below you will find my list, which is likely not complete.
It doesn’t include our retired founders nor the staff based in Australia that were let go because the Perth office closed down nor those that left our company to pursue a PhD (like FNU Sidharth).
For the most part, we can of course only speculate why they left or were let go, as we are not privy to the former staff members’ / management’s reasons, but quite a few hints on LinkedIn have suggested to me over the past 1.5 years there must have been dissatisfaction with leadership and/or work culture on the side of several employees.
While it may not always be the company’s fault, why employees leave or get their contracts terminated, a revolving door of talent is usually a concerning indicator that something is wrong, especially when employees leave a company that is supposedly on the cusp of greatness. Why would anyone leave such an employer despite a commercial breakthrough in sight?!
What comes to mind other than a big fat pay cheque growing on greener pastures is either frustration because from the inside they can see the breakthrough is not nearly as close as management keeps on suggesting to the outside world or possibly something like a toxic work culture that breeds dissatisfaction.
Yes, of course there are also many other reasons why someone might opt for a change that have nothing at all to do with the company as such. However, just have a look at the sheer number of people who - for whatever reason - are no longer BrainChip employees:
Rob Telson
Nandan Nayampally
Chris Jones
Sheila Sabanal-Lau
Nikunj Kotecha
Anup Vanarse
Rudy Pei
Thao Tran
Daniel Keller
Nezar Lheimeur
Sébastien Crouzet
Richard Bohl
Edward Lien
Steve Thorne
Richard Resseguie
Richard Chevalier
Olivier Coenen
Staff still employed but “Open to Work”:
Bajana sai chaithanya varma
Fares Ernez
Rohan Shingre (intern only)
Then there was also Steve Brightfield’s puzzling comment “I’m interested” under a job offer in a February LinkedIn post by a former Qualcomm colleague, Ramesh Chandrasekhar, who has founded a startup called Aynak Inc (“We’re building the next generation of smart eyewear that discreetly enhances hearing while delivering premium style and comfort… without the stigma of traditional hearing aids”). Maybe it just didn’t work out?
Now BrainChip is advertising the position of a Senior Digital Design Engineer.
Will Kenneth Wu be the next ex-BrainChip employee?
Getting rid off staff for the takeoverThere was a lot of staff turnover in the last 12 months... a bit too much, in my opinion.
His previous post makes no sense at all in connection with the current one. The first post was clearly referring to a breakthrough in their work – and that’s how many understood it, judging by the reactions. The fact that Anil even congratulated him only reinforced that impression.
And then in the very next post suddenly the U-turn with “I was let go from Brainchip.” Honestly – you don’t do that. If nothing comes out tomorrow regarding any Brainchip progress, I’d consider it rather negative on his part. To me it looks very unprofessional. I find this approach highly questionable.
Just my opinion.