BRN Discussion Ongoing

Tothemoon24

Top 20

IMG_1550.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 26 users

7für7

Top 20
who owns the patent? no mention of BrainChip in the post ?

I think you have to wait like all the others before judging or something… let’s wait and see… one thing for sure.. not prices sensitive
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Wags

Regular
Hi all, happy Friday.
Can anyone enlighten me (or others) if we are in any of this prophese magic. It all sounds pretty good to me, especially if you download and have a look at the whitepaper, lots of mentions of SNN, few shot learning, ultra low power, etc etc.
I know Prophese is listed on the Brainchip website as an enablement partner, but within the whitepaper there are mentions of synsense. So very confusing for me.
Any clarity would be good, and if this is essentially us, I like it a lot.
Cheers

 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 3 users

Guzzi62

Regular
Hi all, happy Friday.
Can anyone enlighten me (or others) if we are in any of this prophese magic. It all sounds pretty good to me, especially if you download and have a look at the whitepaper, lots of mentions of SNN, few shot learning, ultra low power, etc etc.
I know Prophese is listed on the Brainchip website as an enablement partner, but within the whitepaper there are mentions of synsense. So very confusing for me.
Any clarity would be good, and if this is essentially us, I like it a lot.
Cheers

Sadly not, according to my chat boot that answered as follows:


No — Akida (BrainChip’s neuromorphic hardware) is not mentioned or used in this project.


The SFERA system relies on:


  • Two Prophesee EVK4 event cameras with Fujinon fisheye lenses.
  • Standard CPU-based processing (real-time >50 Hz) for detection and tracking.
  • Algorithms:
    • Event clustering (Prophesee SDK).
    • Bayesian state estimator with a von Mises–Fisher distribution for tracking.

The paper specifically notes that all processing runs on a standard CPU, with no mention of specialized neuromorphic accelerators like Akida, Loihi, or SpiNNaker.


⚡ That said, the event-based nature of SFERA means it could benefit from neuromorphic processors like Akida in future work — but this isn’t part of the current implementation.


Do you want me to check if there are any follow-up works where SFERA (or similar 360° event cameras) have been paired with Akida or other neuromorphic chips?

Yes!

Short answer: No evidence that Akida was used with SFERA specifically — but Akida has been integrated with Prophesee event cameras in other projects and there’s active research combining event cameras with neuromorphic processors. I searched the paper, the authors’ GitHub, vendor blogs and recent news to confirm. PROPHESEE+1


Details & supporting sources


  • The SFERA paper / project description and the authors’ GitHub make no mention of Akida or BrainChip hardware — SFERA’s prototype uses Prophesee EVK4 cameras and CPU-based processing. PROPHESEE+1
  • BrainChip (Akida) and Prophesee have an established partnership and demos showing Akida processing data from Prophesee event cameras (announced in 2022 and demonstrated at events in 2025). So pairing Prophesee sensors with Akida is feasible and has been publicly shown — but that is not the same as the SFERA authors having done it. PROPHESEE+1
  • There are real-world deployments and press items describing Akida+Prophesee solutions for drone / search-and-rescue / detection tasks (examples reported by BrainChip / partners). These show the ecosystem moving toward such pairings. BrainChip+1
  • Academic and preprint work also explores combining event cameras with neuromorphic processors or spiking/SNN approaches — i.e., the idea is actively researched and viable.
I know some here don't like the AI Boots, so feel free answering better yourself!
 
  • Fire
  • Sad
Reactions: 2 users

Diogenese

Top 20

View attachment 91557
Hi TTM,

"... a concept invented 4+ years ago ..."

We knew the patents were filed in 2022, so they were developing the concept for some time before that, and the applications have continued to evolve to the stage where TENNs now replaces transformers in many applications.

WO2023250093A1 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTION IN SPATIOTEMPORAL NEURAL NETWORKS 20220622

US2025209313A1 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING ENCODER PROJECTION IN NEURAL NETWORKS 20231222

Olivier is rightly proud of their invention, as I'm sure Rudy is also.

1 sleep to go for ... ?
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
Post on LinkedIn

Evening 7fur7 ,

Getting excited .....

Booooooom , this Bull needs to get some pace...... after burner lit......3 ..2...1......

Regards,
Esq.
 

Attachments

  • cow fart giphy.gif
    cow fart giphy.gif
    1.6 MB · Views: 24
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Hi all, happy Friday.
Can anyone enlighten me (or others) if we are in any of this prophese magic. It all sounds pretty good to me, especially if you download and have a look at the whitepaper, lots of mentions of SNN, few shot learning, ultra low power, etc etc.
I know Prophese is listed on the Brainchip website as an enablement partner, but within the whitepaper there are mentions of synsense. So very confusing for me.
Any clarity would be good, and if this is essentially us, I like it a lot.
Cheers

Hi Wags,

We'd all love certainty on this.

We've been friends with Prophesee for a while:
https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...tb=1&msockid=30da4b769aaa11f0a91049ce4a9d57b9

BrainChip Demonstrates Gesture Recognition with Prophesee EV4 Development Camera

There was a time when Prophesee did team up with Synsense (and Sony?), and I thought their el cheapo GenX320 was developed so Synsense could keep up.

But then Synsense merged with Inivation (Prophesee's nemesis).

So there is this:

https://brainchip.com/prophesee-lp/

Efficient AI-Powered Detection​


Arquimea has deployed Akida with a Prophesee camera on a drone to detect distressed swimmers and surfers in the ocean helping lifeguards scale their services for large beach areas, opting for an event-based computing solution for its superior efficiency and consistently high-quality results.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

Wags

Regular
Thanks @Guzzi62 and @Diogenese. Really appreciate your effort in reply. So much mixed feelings for me, I take note sadly, of Guzzi62 chatbot reply, yet optimistic of Diogenese. Hopefully the future holds promise for the partnership with Prophese, just wish it would chop chop hurry up.
Thanks again, enjoy the weekend.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 5 users

Frangipani

Top 20
I can’t find any serious sources for this socalled MIT study…

Seriously? Did you even use a proper search engine (if yes, which one?) or merely consult ChatGPT to help you source the original source?
(The LLM may obviously have had a “motive” to deflect from the MIT researchers’ findings and hence may have falsely claimed no such study existed… 😂)

While the authors of the pre-print published in June 2025 wouldn’t fully agree with the (presumably) AI-generated and in part unfactual* “summary” of their study that @Brainshit’s screenshot shows, the study as such is very real. The paper is titled “Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task” and can easily be found online by googling “MIT study ChatGPT”:

*In the project website’s FAQ section, they distance themselves from sensationalist and too general interpretations of their study (which they freely admit has certain limitations) and from inaccurate terms such as “brain-scans”.
Also, the “83.3 %” refer to the following sentence: “Quoting accuracy was significantly different across experimental conditions (Figure 6). In the LLM‐assisted group, 83.3 % of participants (15/18) failed to provide a correct quotation, whereas only 11.1 % (2/18) in both the Search‐Engine and Brain‐Only groups encountered the same difficulty.”



Pre-print: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08872

8D5CF2A8-7BA5-44D3-AB0D-C3688F23DA84.jpeg


(…)
EBC4115E-DB45-4B03-87DA-CEA212D5E858.jpeg

(…)

A99EFDE3-7E03-403F-8F9E-661503CE4F75.jpeg




9F6D2998-3BB7-4CC9-97EB-F5E15C774902.jpeg
73470CEC-86EC-49EF-8E1F-7CB7692D9980.jpeg
DB179D13-E35A-44E7-B67A-B91BF728E345.jpeg
Project website: https://www.brainonllm.com/


LinkedIn post by first author Nataliya Kosmyna:



You can also find numerous video interviews with Nataliya Kosmyna online, in which she explains what the study was actually about and what it doesn’t show.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Wow
Reactions: 6 users

7für7

Top 20
Go go goEvening 7fur7 ,

Getting excited .....

Booooooom , this Bull needs to get some pace...... after burner lit......3 ..2...1......

Regards,
Esq.


GO BRAINCHIP!!!!!

The Office Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Hi TTM,

"... a concept invented 4+ years ago ..."

We knew the patents were filed in 2022, so they were developing the concept for some time before that, and the applications have continued to evolve to the stage where TENNs now replaces transformers in many applications.

WO2023250093A1 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTION IN SPATIOTEMPORAL NEURAL NETWORKS 20220622

US2025209313A1 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING ENCODER PROJECTION IN NEURAL NETWORKS 20231222

Olivier is rightly proud of their invention, as I'm sure Rudy is also.

1 sleep to go for ... ?
@Diogenese

If you don’t mind sharing your expertise Dio as the answers from Google leave me confused.

Who owns the rights to the Plaides patents?

The applicant or inventor?

Reads to me as though it’s the employer?

On further reading sounds like there might be employment conditions or contract establishing this issue so it depends on employment contract conditions?

Pretty important issue!

Edit: my concern is Qualcomm have now pinched Rudy so hoping Plaides is protected by the patent or if they get access to that too?

Cheers
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 5 users

7für7

Top 20
@Diogenese

If you don’t mind sharing your expertise Dio as the answers from Google leave me confused.

Who owns the rights to the Plaides patents?

The applicant or inventor?

Reads to me as though it’s the employer?

Cheers

The applicant of course… if you’re employed, most contracts state that inventions related to the company’s tech belong to the employer. Independent stuff outside the company’s field/resources usually stays yours, but it depends on local law and the contract.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 2 users
Yet another brilliant week being a BRN shareholder and with SP rising so much over the last 5 days we all could retire in another 22 years. Have a safe a wonderful weekend all ❤️
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 9 users

Diogenese

Top 20
@Diogenese

If you don’t mind sharing your expertise Dio as the answers from Google leave me confused.

Who owns the rights to the Plaides patents?

The applicant or inventor?

Reads to me as though it’s the employer?

On further reading sounds like there might be employment conditions or contract establishing this issue so it depends on employment contract conditions?

Pretty important issue!

Edit: my concern is Qualcomm have now pinched Rudy so hoping Plaides is protected by the patent or if they get access to that too?

Cheers
There will be an assignment agreement in the employment contract to assign the invention to the employer.

As usual US law is a bit different from British-based systems. The Constitution requires the patent to be filed by the inventor and it can then be assigned to the employer, whereas, in our system the patent application is usually filed by the employer.

Key date is the priority date, when the application was first filed.

As Rudy and Olivier were both employees of BRN at the time the invention was made, BRN is the owner.

No doubt they got a lot of bonus shares.

An interesting case may arise if Rudy creates an improvement invention which requires the use of the original TENNs patents. In such a case the improvement invention is subject to the original patent and could not be used without some agreement (licence/cross-licence) with BRN.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 19 users

7für7

Top 20
Yet another brilliant week being a BRN shareholder and with SP rising so much over the last 5 days we all could retire in another 22 years. Have a safe a wonderful weekend all ❤️

The most bullshit sorry bullish statement from you till now… looking forward for more!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
The most bullshit sorry bullish statement from you till now… looking forward for more!
Ok so reality. What another crap week being a BRN share holder with our share price dropping so much over the last 5 days we could all have retired weeks ago. Have a really crap weekend everyone 💩
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

7für7

Top 20
Ok so reality. What another crap week being a BRN share holder with our share price dropping so much over the last 5 days we could all have retired weeks ago. Have a really crap weekend everyone 💩

Sounds pessimistic… but real! And… I can read some positive aspects between the lines…. Keep it up like this bro… 👊😎
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
There will be an assignment agreement in the employment contract to assign the invention to the employer.

As usual US law is a bit different from British-based systems. The Constitution requires the patent to be filed by the inventor and it can then be assigned to the employer, whereas, in our system the patent application is usually filed by the employer.

Key date is the priority date, when the application was first filed.

As Rudy and Olivier were both employees of BRN at the time the invention was made, BRN is the owner.

No doubt they got a lot of bonus shares.

An interesting case may arise if Rudy creates an improvement invention which requires the use of the original TENNs patents. In such a case the improvement invention is subject to the original patent and could not be used without some agreement (licence/cross-licence) with BRN.
Thanks @Diogenese for indulging me. You always add value to the subject…. and I knew you’d be all over it!


It’ll be handy to have Qualcomm provide a mass market revenue stream for us!

Cheers !
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

7für7

Top 20
Thanks @Diogenese for indulging me. You always add value to the subject…. and I knew you’d be all over it!


It’ll be handy to have Qualcomm provide a mass market revenue stream for us!

Cheers !

You’re welcome 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
  • Thinking
Reactions: 1 users

manny100

Top 20
Interesting:
"
In the case of Goodman Group, Wesfarmers and CBA, Mawhinney pointed out that, with a share price trading at around 27x next years earnings, these companies are valued similar to that of Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), but with one core difference..

“And there's a company you may have heard called Nvidia that also trades at 27 times next year's earnings and it's vilified by the press as expensive, but it's grown its earnings also at 27% per annum, whereas those other three companies are growing at 6% per annum collectively.”"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top Bottom