MDhere
Top 20
Not sure Dio, but that's an interestimg answer by Dana on Linkedin, answering a question with a question but also adding single quotation marks to his answer then adding a question then a further question on qualcomm. Maybe the single quotation mark is a statement. Then combining the questions as one combined?
Hi MD,
Let's hope this is happening now. He has put a 3 - 5 year timeline on it, but the wording "is moving" suggests a shorter timeframe. Where does his info come from?
Isnt the english language intersting when you add or omit apostrophes lol
Thanks for the detail Frangi. For the record i own a vw and wrote the two part numbers 199398500A and 199398500B down in case i ever need them.Actually, those âexciting newsâ you shared with us are totally wurst to me.
(It basically means âI donât careâ or âit doesnât make a differenceâ, and yes, thatâs a really common expression in German, even though Iâd personally use the variant wurscht in this context.)
Neither does Dana LeVan provide any source at all for his claim that âMercedes-Benz & BrainChip are moving from R&D to commercial deploymentâ, nor does he have any connection to either company as far as we can tell.
One thing I was able to find out about him, though, is that he is the former CMO of Wevorce (âNew Agreements. Peaceful. Relationships. Skip the courthouse, keep the kindnessâ). On their website, where he promotes himself as an excellent pick for âprivate judgeâ, he describes himself as being highly skilled at Divorce Coaching, so our company may want to save his contact details in case one day a joint partnership goes awryâŚ(https://www.wevorce.com/blog/team/dana-levan/)
Note that he is now the CMO of CrowdSmart.ai (https://www.crowdsmart.ai/about-crowdsmart/), whose âpatented human-interactive AI helps groups share and refine their intelligence with curated insights to generate trusted and predictive strategies, plans, and decisions.â
My guess is that his post was largely AI-generated and he unfortunately failed to verify what the LLM came up with.
By the way, when you shared that paragraph from Dana LeVanâs LinkedIn post, why did you cut off the header that reads âNeuromorphic Hardware: The Long-Term Play (3-5 years)â? Didnât you consider it important to also share that timeframe with us?
View attachment 79564
Somebody asked Dana LeVan about his claim re MB & BRN on LinkedIn, and he cryptically responded with a quote.
Is it meant to be his own reply, which seems weird given the quotation marks and the fact he himself made that very claim in the first place?
Or was this quote taken from the Trump fan boysâ podcast he referred to earlier in his post (without sharing which episode it was, though)?
I noticed that he also gave Patrick Pasternackiâs second reply a, in which he was informed that the Vision EQXX concept car would never go commercial, but he still didnât clear up the confusion. His self-description on https://www.wevorce.com/blog/team/dana-levan/ as a âpassionate and empathetic communicator who untangles complex circumstancesâ doesnât exactly shine through hereâŚ
View attachment 79565
Anyway, not a trustworthy source at all, if you ask meâŚ
I much prefer to listen to the horseâs mouth: â⌠weâre currently looking into Neuromorphic Computing as part of a research project. Depending on the further development progress, integration could become possible within a timeframe of 5 to 10 years.â (Mercedes-Benz on LinkedIn, January 29, 2025)
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-449452
As for Dana i found it useful as he at least shows enthusiasm and has some merit.
Also i didn't worry about pasting all of the words as i additinally correcrly added the ENTIRE linkedin article so it was easy to locate.
Anyway all i can say is boomidy boom boom.
Last edited:
âŚ
