Frangipani
Top 20
Thank you, Taproot!Great research as always.
My take is different to yours though.
I believe ISL are/will be the subcontractor.
But how does that align with BrainChip literally stating that the undisclosed prospective subcontractor is a “multinational aerospace and defense customer”?

Company Bio | ISL - Technology for Real World Solutions

“ISL was founded to tackle the toughest problems facing society, from national security to energy independence and climate change, and find sustainable and effective solutions that work in the real-world. ISL’s approach is to begin with a ”fresh eyes” approach, questioning any and all preconceived notions and assumptions, then use a rigorous scientific, physics-based, and engineering approach to develop entirely new and often disruptive approaches that have a major industry impact, not just an incremental improvement. We are also a fully vertically integrated “one-stop” solutions provider, from nascent idea through to full rate production (ISO-9001, AS-9100, etc.).”
ISL say that they were the other awardee
Joe Guerci ( ISL CEO ), said as much in the first comment after the announcement.
See Brainchip Linkedin post.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/brainchip-holdings-limited/posts/
At first glance, that Joe Guerci comment does indeed appear to challenge my theory that RTX is going to be our subcontractor.
Nevertheless I believe @Space Cadet is correct:
I'm not so sure that is confirmation of anything other than they were the first to use Akida in this space through the SBIR grant a couof years ago when they used Akida. If it was ISL Phase 3 would have finished that, although TENNs wasn't available then
In fact, I think the confusion actually stems from a misunderstanding.
Let me explain: What most of us (including me) probably failed to notice at first glance is that we are dealing with two separate texts published by BrainChip that differ in one very important detail: Whereas the ASX announcement mentions that “The contract is an expansion of efforts after a multinational aerospace and defense customer that successfully demonstrated radar processing algorithms capable of running on BrainChip’s commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) neuromorphic hardware as part of an internal research and development initiative” and that “BrainChip is currently in negotiations to enter into a subcontractor agreement with the previously mentioned aerospace and defense company for the completion of the contract award”…
…the LinkedIn post that ISL’s CEO Joe Guerci reacted to does not!
So here’s my theory: Joe Guerci mistakenly thought that BrainChip was referring to ISL when mentioning “the successful demonstration of radar processing algorithms running on BrainChip’s Akida neuromorphic hardware (…)”, even though in actual fact that LinkedIn post referred to a completely different company (which I believe has to be RTX due to Tom M.’s LinkedIn comments).
That’s why he said “Www.islinc.com was the other awardee”.
Note he says “was”, not “is”!
Most likely, he was disappointed that BrainChip did not refer to ISL by name, so he is taking this issue into his own hands in the comment section now: His post is basically self-advertisement.
It is, however, not telling us that ISL has anything to do with the newly awarded radar development contract to BrainChip by AFRL, which will see our company pay a subcontractor (namely RTX) to do R&D as a continuation of their previous work. At least that’s what I think…
Attachments
Last edited: