You underlined "Indian cuisine" that it's only an "important part" of totally ignoring the fact, that it's a "key ingredient" of Mediterranean and Middle Eastern cuisine! (and being mentioned first as such, seems to indicate its use is more prevalent).
You Cherry Picker
The fact that 75% is produced in India, might have something to do with the fact that it constitutes almost 18% of the World population.
Personally, I associate chickpeas with both hummus and chana masala.
No, itās more of a modified clone, itās not like the other developments have ādiedā⦠besides, we donāt want to make a religion out of it! Itās still a man-made technology.For the tech minded amongst us:
Is Akida Pico essentially a somewhat reincarnation of Akida 1500 ????
Hereās the link to the livestreamās recording (in German):
The presentation by Dominik Blum (Mercedes-Benz) starts at 3:48 min.
There was one slide that showed - amongst other things - various brands of neuromorphic hardware (ABR, BrainChip, Innatera, Intel, SynSense), including Akida 1.0 and 2.0, but none was mentioned by name. Same with the slide showing the EQXX: there was merely mention of the voice assistantās keyword spotting having been realised on āa neuromorphic chipā, which was said to have considerably improved this functionās energy efficiency.
Please note that the slide showing neuromorphic hardware also lists the ABR Time Series Processor (TSP1), developed by Applied Brain Research, the Canadian company Chris Eliasmith co-founded and is CTO of (see the link to my previous post below).
I reckon TSP1 is what MB are going to base their future research on regarding their recently announced collaboration with the University of Waterloo.
So just as I said the other day, that announcement is highly likely no reason to celebrate for BRN shareholders:
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-438892
In the Q&A session afterwards, Dominik Blum was asked whether the architecture of neuromorphic chips resembled that of GPUs or whether it was a completely different design. His answer was: āDa wir uns mehr auf die softwareseitige Entwicklung von āneuromorphicā fokussieren, kann ich da keine gute Antwort geben.ā (āSince we are focussing more on the software side development of neuromorphic, I canāt give you a good answer to that question.ā)
He was also asked whether he could quantify the potential energy savings of neuromorphic computing and said that there were vague estimations of up to 90%, however, heād be careful with any concrete numbers (suggesting 90% might actually be too high) and stressed that they are still at a very early stage of research and that further studies were required.
When asked how long it would take for fully autonomous cars to become reality, he replied he would prefer to answer as āa private personā (= not as an MB employee) and then said he believed it would be within the next 15 years, but there were various uncertainties to factor in. He wriggled for an answer when asked whether any legal framework could pose a problem regarding that time frame.
To me the gist was that while MB considers neuromorphic computing a very promising technology regarding gains in energy efficiency (which will become more and more important on the path towards cars becoming fully autonomous), they are still at a very early stage of research - Dominik Blum literally said so. There you go, you heard it from the horseās mouth. So donāt expect neuromorphic technology in any MB serial production cars in the near future. At least thatās what I took away from that presentation.
Anything major I missed?
Here are some of the presentation slides:
View attachment 71337
View attachment 71338
Energy consumption increases with the vehicleās number of AI-based systems:
View attachment 71339
The higher the SAE-Level, the higher the energy consumption:
View attachment 71340
Neuromorphic computing is a young field of research ⦠with a lot of open questions, e.g.:
View attachment 71341
SNNs in the event chain of autonomous driving:
View attachment 71342
This slide kind of looked familiarā¦
View attachment 71343
Dominik Blum said that they are still in the research phase as to event-based cameras that will one day complement regular cameras, radar and LiDARā¦
View attachment 71346
View attachment 71344
View attachment 71345
I donāt interpret that comment as meaning he was unhappy. His interest appears to have been tweaked by this advertisement - perhaps an opportunity too great to resist.Another of our Laguna Hills engineers leaving without having another job lined upā¦
It should be noted that he has since been given glowing references from his former BrainChip colleagues.
Nevertheless, he seems to have been unhappy in his job for quite a while (see his 4 month old LinkedIn comment)⦠What is going on?
View attachment 71324
View attachment 71325
View attachment 71330
View attachment 71331
View attachment 71332
View attachment 71334
Donāt forget about the legendary intil and EBMā¦and our partner mircrochip and contrpheseeā¦
There it is again, a new combination Akido Pico
Sounds kind of Japanese
____
In your posts I usually read over typos and don't notice them. But with Akida?
It's like Intel's at that time Pentium - Pentia, Pentio, Pentiam, Pentiom - hum hum.
Always a close call.
___
Seriously, this needs to be hammered or ram into the heads of all BRN writers.
How else is someone supposed to create a brand or product?
Kuci
Bolex
Nercedes Denz - yeah
Gola
A-pod
Verrari
A-pat
Akido
Dolls-Boyce
Mc Bonald's
And so on
Yo, Akido Bollisto
___
At the beginning I thought more funny, mistakes are human.
What would their company say if something was posted globally and said:
Dugatti
or
Bugatto
___
It's about building a brand. Painchip?!
I don't know why I'm so upset if the own employees do not take their texting seriously. Just letters.
Looks like some friends in Japan, with a little support from Megachips, have been playing with Akida & MetaTF
Apols if already posted as I may have missed it and haven't done a search.
Short video end of post.
Paper HERE
View attachment 68589
License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2408.13018v1 [cs.RO] 23 Aug 2024
Robust Iterative Value Conversion: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Neurochip-driven Edge Robots
Yuki Kadokawakadokawa.yuki@naist.ac.jpTomohito Koderakodera.tomohito.kp9@is.naist.jpYoshihisa Tsuruminetsurumine.yoshihisa@is.naist.jpShinya Nishimuranishimura.shinya@megachips.co.jpTakamitsu Matsubaratakam-m@is.naist.jpNara Institute of Science and Technology, 630-0192, Nara, Japan MegaChips Corporation, 532-0003, Osaka, Japan
Abstract
A neurochip is a device that reproduces the signal processing mechanisms of brain neurons and calculates Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) with low power consumption and at high speed. Thus, neurochips are attracting attention from edge robot applications, which suffer from limited battery capacity. This paper aims to achieve deep reinforcement learning (DRL) that acquires SNN policies suitable for neurochip implementation. Since DRL requires a complex function approximation, we focus on conversion techniques from Floating Point NN (FPNN) because it is one of the most feasible SNN techniques. However, DRL requires conversions to SNNs for every policy update to collect the learning samples for a DRL-learning cycle, which updates the FPNN policy and collects the SNN policy samples. Accumulative conversion errors can significantly degrade the performance of the SNN policies. We propose Robust Iterative Value Conversion (RIVC) as a DRL that incorporates conversion error reduction and robustness to conversion errors. To reduce them, FPNN is optimized with the same number of quantization bits as an SNN. The FPNN output is not significantly changed by quantization. To robustify the conversion error, an FPNN policy that is applied with quantization is updated to increase the gap between the probability of selecting the optimal action and other actions. This step prevents unexpected replacements of the policyās optimal actions. We verified RIVCās effectiveness on a neurochip-driven robot. The results showed that RIVC consumed 1/15 times less power and increased the calculation speed by five times more than an edge CPU (quad-core ARM Cortex-A72). The previous framework with no countermeasures against conversion errors failed to train the policies. Videos from our experiments are available:
Excerpts:
5.1 Construction of Learning System for Experiments
5.1.1 Entire Experiment Settings
This section describes the construction of the proposed framework shown in Fig. 2. We utilized a desktop PC equipped with a GPU (Nvidia RTX3090) for updating the policies and an Akida Neural Processor SoC as a neurochip [9, 12]. The robot was controlled by the policies implemented in the neurochip. SNNs were implemented to the neurochip by a conversion executed by the MetaTF of Akida that converts the software [9, 12]. Samples were collected by the SNN policies in both the simulation tasks and the real-robot tasks since the target task is neurochip-driven robot control. For learning, the GPU updates the policies based on the collected samples in the real-robot environment. Concerning the SNN structure, the quantization of weights š¤š described in Eq. (16) and the calculation accuracy of the activation functions described in Eq. (19) are verified in a range from 2- to 8-bits; they are the implementation constraints of the neurochip [9].
Table 3: Hardware performance of policies: FPNN was evaluated by edge-CPU (Raspberry Pi 4: quad-core ARM Cortex-A72). SNN was evaluated by neurochip (Akida 1000 [9]). āPower consā and āCalc. speedā denote power consumption and calculation speed for obtaining one action from NN policies using each piece of hardware. Power consumption was measured by voltage checker (TAP-TST8N).
Network FPNN SNN Hardware Edge-CPU Neurochip Power consumption [mW] 61 4 Calculation speed [ms] 205 40
7 Conclusion
We proposed RIVC as a novel DRL framework for training SNN policies with a neurochip in real-robot environments. RIVC offers two prominent features: 1) it trains QNN policies, which can be robust for conversion to SNN policies, and 2) it updates the values with GIO, which is robust to the optimal action replacements by conversion to SNN policies. We also implemented RIVC for object-tracking tasks with a neurochip in real-robot environments. Our experiments show that RIVC can train SNN policies by DRL in real-robot environments.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the MegaChips Corporation. We thank Alonso Ramos Fernandez for his experimental assistance.
Not ignoring, but ignorantYou are totally ignoring the fact that I was not at all ignoring Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Cuisineā¦![]()
If it tastes like garlic mash, you're doing it wrongNot ignoring, but ignorant
I had to Google Hummus..
I had in my mind, that it was that parsley concoction..
Never liked dips..
This Reddit quote, doesn't exactly make me want to try it either..
"It's texture is awful, and the flavour is just... garlic mush. It looks like something a cat threw up. I don't understand why it's so popular"
Can't be the brightest dude on the planet, commenting on a publicly shared job advert via his linkedin account that his entire network, including current colleagues, would be able to see.Another of our Laguna Hills engineers leaving without having another job lined upā¦
It should be noted that he has since been given glowing references from his former BrainChip colleagues.
Nevertheless, he seems to have been unhappy in his job for quite a while (see his 4 month old LinkedIn comment)⦠What is going on?
View attachment 71324
View attachment 71325
View attachment 71330
View attachment 71331
View attachment 71332
View attachment 71334
Woo Hoo ,
The new Akido edge box early demo , ..... I'll take a dozen.
Hope we all have a good weekend.
Regards,
Esq.
I did read the Glassdoor webpage ages ago about BrainChip and there seemed to be a lot disgruntled employees. Happy to correct me if im wrong. Canāt seem to read it nowAnother of our Laguna Hills engineers leaving without having another job lined upā¦
It should be noted that he has since been given glowing references from his former BrainChip colleagues.
Nevertheless, he seems to have been unhappy in his job for quite a while (see his 4 month old LinkedIn comment)⦠What is going on?
View attachment 71324
View attachment 71325
View attachment 71330
View attachment 71331
View attachment 71332
View attachment 71334