BRN Discussion Ongoing

This is the body of the email, I just sent Tony Dawe.
I will let the forum know, if there is a response or information I can post, regarding the subject 👍

"You may have noticed, there has been some discussion on TSEx about Dr Tony Lewis's LinkedIn comment, concerning small LMs and neuromorphic hardware.

His comments, in my opinion, were ambiguous.
He said both, neuromorphic hardware using them and the VSLMs themselves "hold promise".
Also stating, to his knowledge, BrainChip would be the first to implement this, at the Edge.

To me, he said they are still working on it, but it could also be, that he, being commercially minded, was saying..
"We've done it, but AKD2000 doesn't exist yet, so it's still just in simulation".


In FactFinder's post, about the November 6th private shareholder meeting, he stated the following.

"It has been confirmed by the CEO Sean Hehir in person to myself and others that Brainchip has succeeded in developing and running a number of Large Language Models, LLMs, on AKIDA 2.0 and that AKIDA 3.0 is on track and that its primary purpose will be to focus on running LLM's as its point of technology difference".

Straight off the bat, FactFinder refers to LLMs, not the "very small" or "tiny" LMs, that Dr Tony, refers to having promise.
So either he misquoted Sean, or Sean referenced LLMs.

From the above meeting, it appears that, at the very least, very small LMs are successfully running, in simulation, on AKIDA 2.0 and this is now public knowledge?

My questions are..

Are VSLMs running successfully on AKIDA 2.0, or are they still ironing out the bugs and this will be more an AKIDA 3.0 focused, game?

If they are running successfully, this would be considered quite a huge achievement (being a World first and considering the current hunger, for such technology).
Why hasn't the Company made a proper statement/Tweet, or something, when the information is apparently public knowledge?

It seems to me, that it would be in the Company's best interest (as well as us shareholders of course) to at least "tap" the drum and not have to rely on Chinese whispers etc?"
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 48 users

hotty4040

Regular
Anybody else got this email? Thinking scam

Hello Earlyrelease,
We’re asking everyone to choose a unique username instead of using discriminators in their username (username#0000). Starting March 4, 2024, Discord will begin assigning usernames to users who have not chosen one themselves. You are receiving this email because you have not chosen a new username.
This is a notice that if you do not update your username by March 4, 2024, Discord will assign a new, unique username to your account. We will try to assign you a unique username that is similar to your current username.
You can update your username now by following these instructions:
On Desktop/Browser
  1. Select the cog wheel in the bottom left to open User Settings
  2. Click Get Started
On Mobile
  1. Open the You tab by tapping your profile in the bottom right of the screen
  2. Tap Get Started
You can always change your username later in your User Settings. Learn more about our recent changes to usernames in our support article.
Thank you,
Discord
Need help? Contact our support team or hit us up on Twitter @discord.
Want to give us feedback? Let us know what you think on our feedback site.

Been there, done that early, I'm suggesting, disregard, I hope............

hotty...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

RobjHunt

Regular
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users

manny100

Top 20
Interesting read FF,
That led me to another term I had not been aware of but suspected was a tactic used by shorters in collusion.
A Bear Raid.
In a typical bear raid, short sellers may conspire beforehand to quietly establish large short positions in the target stock. Since the short interest in the stock increases the risk of a short squeeze that can inflict substantial losses on the shorts, the short sellers cannot afford to wait patiently for months until their short strategy works out.


The next step in the bear raid is akin to a smear campaign, with whispers and rumors about the company spread by unknown sources. These rumors can be anything that portrays the target company in a negative light, such as allegations of accounting fraud, an SEC investigation, an earnings miss, financial difficulties, and so on. The rumors may cause nervous investors to exit the stock in droves, driving the price down further and giving the short sellers the profit they are looking for.
That is more common than we think.
Huge shorters will use both social and established media to put out negative stories about a company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

Boab

I wish I could paint like Vincent
It’ll soon be Monday
1708247313903.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 25 users

Diogenese

Top 20
It’ll soon be Monday
View attachment 57152
When we were young, our dog won the tail-wagging contest at the local dog show.

The next year, the "lady" (Cruella de Ville) next to us stood on his tail, but he would never have beaten that squirrel.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Internet dropout mid-message ...
If that happens, or you accidentally close a page, or otherwise stuff up..

The message you started is still there, but you have to open a new tab and "look" for it at the bottom.

Where you would start a new message.

At least that works for me..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users

Boab

I wish I could paint like Vincent
  • Fire
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

Jumpchooks

Regular
When we were young, our dog won the tail-wagging contest at the local dog show.

The next year, the "lady" next to us stood on his tail, but he would never have beaten that squirrel.
Our dogs' tail used to stand up when he was checking out other dogs. My father told us that it was his Pleasurometer. (aside from other parts of his anatomy) 😉
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users

From rags to riches
Hi All
I wonder if all those who rubbished Brainchip’s sale of IP to Renesas still think it was a meaningless event involving a never heard of Japanese company of no consequence.

Either they were right and Renesas has been on an amazing growth trajectory over the last 3 years or they were…..(insert own descriptor).

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 32 users

Vatzat

Emerged
I had a play around with that site a while back, it looked somewhat useful for evaluating dividend paying stocks to provide a suitable DCF via their AI model but crap for anything pre revenue, such as negative pricing for BRN and RAC.
BRN & RAC, your talking my love language 😁
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

CHIPS

Regular
Anybody else got this email? Thinking scam

Hello Earlyrelease,
We’re asking everyone to choose a unique username instead of using discriminators in their username (username#0000). Starting March 4, 2024, Discord will begin assigning usernames to users who have not chosen one themselves. You are receiving this email because you have not chosen a new username.
This is a notice that if you do not update your username by March 4, 2024, Discord will assign a new, unique username to your account. We will try to assign you a unique username that is similar to your current username.
You can update your username now by following these instructions:
On Desktop/Browser
  1. Select the cog wheel in the bottom left to open User Settings
  2. Click Get Started
On Mobile
  1. Open the You tab by tapping your profile in the bottom right of the screen
  2. Tap Get Started
You can always change your username later in your User Settings. Learn more about our recent changes to usernames in our support article.
Thank you,
Discord
Need help? Contact our support team or hit us up on Twitter @discord.
Want to give us feedback? Let us know what you think on our feedback site.

It is real!
 

manny100

Top 20
This is the body of the email, I just sent Tony Dawe.
I will let the forum know, if there is a response or information I can post, regarding the subject 👍

"You may have noticed, there has been some discussion on TSEx about Dr Tony Lewis's LinkedIn comment, concerning small LMs and neuromorphic hardware.

His comments, in my opinion, were ambiguous.
He said both, neuromorphic hardware using them and the VSLMs themselves "hold promise".
Also stating, to his knowledge, BrainChip would be the first to implement this, at the Edge.

To me, he said they are still working on it, but it could also be, that he, being commercially minded, was saying..
"We've done it, but AKD2000 doesn't exist yet, so it's still just in simulation".


In FactFinder's post, about the November 6th private shareholder meeting, he stated the following.

"It has been confirmed by the CEO Sean Hehir in person to myself and others that Brainchip has succeeded in developing and running a number of Large Language Models, LLMs, on AKIDA 2.0 and that AKIDA 3.0 is on track and that its primary purpose will be to focus on running LLM's as its point of technology difference".

Straight off the bat, FactFinder refers to LLMs, not the "very small" or "tiny" LMs, that Dr Tony, refers to having promise.
So either he misquoted Sean, or Sean referenced LLMs.

From the above meeting, it appears that, at the very least, very small LMs are successfully running, in simulation, on AKIDA 2.0 and this is now public knowledge?

My questions are..

Are VSLMs running successfully on AKIDA 2.0, or are they still ironing out the bugs and this will be more an AKIDA 3.0 focused, game?

If they are running successfully, this would be considered quite a huge achievement (being a World first and considering the current hunger, for such technology).
Why hasn't the Company made a proper statement/Tweet, or something, when the information is apparently public knowledge?

It seems to me, that it would be in the Company's best interest (as well as us shareholders of course) to at least "tap" the drum and not have to rely on Chinese whispers etc?"
You will get a generic reply from Tony Dawe. It will be hanballed to Tony Lewis for a more specific reply you will not likely get.
The Tonys' will not want to involve themselves in forum sqaubbles.
I personally would not include the He said/I said/they said rhetoric and just cut straight to the question you want answered, ie does AKIDA do....... I would however phrase the question in terms of what Tony Lewis said seeking clarification.You will be more likely to get a meaningful response.
That is just my approach We are all different. Do what you must.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 25 users
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users
You will get a generic reply from Tony Dawe. It will be hanballed to Tony Lewis for a more specific reply you will not likely get.
The Tonys' will not want to involve themselves in forum sqaubbles.
I personally would not include the He said/I said/they said rhetoric and just cut straight to the question you want answered, ie does AKIDA do....... I would however phrase the question in terms of what Tony Lewis said seeking clarification.You will be more likely to get a meaningful response.
That is just my approach We are all different. Do what you must.
My email contained the context for the questions I asked.

And provided the fact, that the information is supposedly public, so clearing up the questions "shouldn't" be an issue.

The "he said" is the information we have been provided, by the Company, via Chinese whisper, so I think it's relevant?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 7 users
Hi All
I wonder if all those who rubbished Brainchip’s sale of IP to Renesas still think it was a meaningless event involving a never heard of Japanese company of no consequence.

Either they were right and Renesas has been on an amazing growth trajectory over the last 3 years or they were…..(insert own descriptor).

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
That goes to show A take over of 9 Billion giving shareholders $ 68 per share is most definitely a goal BRN could achieve at some point is my thinking.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

Diogenese

Top 20
That goes to show A take over of 9 Billion giving shareholders $ 68 per share is most definitely a goal BRN could achieve at some point is my thinking.
Only if it applied sparsity by ignoring zeros.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Top Bottom