I was wondering a similar thing last night... Why come out last year going "oh we love BRN" and now there is a secrecy about it. Unless they want to protect their secret sauce advantage. But cats out the bag as far as I am concerned.
In my opinion I do believe MB is using our tech to various degrees to save energy in CLA and so forth in the new MB.os .I think it is run by Nvidia....but there was mention that we see them more of a partner than competition and that most of the inference would be performed at the edge and send only the inferenced data to the cpu... and then the meta data to the cloud...something along those lines... who knows
I don't think it should be this difficult to find out if we're in a new release vehicle / concept. Neuromorphic has not even been hinted at. I realise this is just a concept and things can change prior to production but if AKIDA is so revolutionary then surely now would be the perfect time to promote its existence. For Merc to announce AKIDA in the EQXX and then not say a single thing about it for over 18 months is just strange - unless they don't plan on using it in production vehicles. BUT the EQXX is at the IAA too and the public are allowed to book rides in it and experience the 'Hey Mercedes' tech enabled by AKIDA. So what the heck is actually going on here?I think it is run by Nvidia....but there was mention that we see them more of a partner than competition and that most of the inference would be performed at the edge and send only the inferenced data to the cpu... and then the meta data to the cloud...something along those lines... who knows
I think we all love BrainChips tech but the issue a lot don’t get is that Akida is an enabler, enabling things built incorporating it to have potentially far greater possibilities - i.e. Akida would play a supporting role to the Nvidia supercomputer mentioned as the principle in MB.OS but Mercedes won’t likely mention BrainChip or Akida when talking up their latest concept (maybe they’ll prove me wrong?); it’d kind of be like somebody spruking the benefits of using a particular bolt to make the latest ship built more seaworthy, who would be interested (apart from shareholders)?. At the AGM there was a question raised about whether we would ever see ‘Akida inside’ like ‘Intel inside’ as a way of putting us out there and the answer from someone was something like Akida technology will rest so deeply in products as a part of something that is apart of something else that that would just not make any sense. I think it will never be that obvious where we sit in the scheme of things but if everything goes to plan the balance sheet should finish up stating our ubiquity. AIMO.I think it is run by Nvidia....but there was mention that we see them more of a partner than competition and that most of the inference would be performed at the edge and send only the inferenced data to the cpu... and then the meta data to the cloud...something along those lines... who knows
I’m concerned they haven’t mentioned akida in the press releases but they also haven’t mentioned nvidia from what I’ve seen so read into that what you will… I have no idea.
Yes, think you are hitting the nail on the head here for where we are at, at present.
Through Nvidia? Who knows… we might never find out… watch the financials.
We don't have a license through them either? Do either deal with mega chips?
It will be interesting to see how many shorts are still in play with BRN in a couple of weeks time
I had to buy more this morning at these prices.. akida 2.0 is going to be released by the end of the month
Is it possible that they ( some companies ) don’t have to pay an upfront IP fee and pay more through royalties?
Crikey! That 800 volt technology is great - supersonic cars!
Why can’t the bolt manufacturer talk it up?
