Cartagena
Regular
The same issue in the energy space.
There’s technology available to supercede oil, gas, coal, and wind generated power, and has been since the mid 1900s.
Unfortunately it’s not whether the technology is good. It’s whether it gets adopted.
BRN clearly have the lead in the AI Edge space, but they are busting every valve to try to get it used and adopted, which is the ultimate challenge in my view..
They probably need to get the right powerful people invested in BRN to then get it the adoption that would make it ubiquitous.. IMO DYOR
Yes Schnitzel Lover, that's what I mentioned earlier. ARM or Qualcomm as large cornerstone investors would do it.
Qualcomm are very close to launching their "edge AI" in smart phones however it makes us wonder how they have managed to develop and commercialise it so quickly.
We all know they have the huge resources and R&D as a Big 5 tech giant, and Brainchip will benefit immensely if they develop a joint venture with eg, Qualcomm or ARM or Samsung to use our Akida IP in future products. Our SP won't be under $10 if that happens!!!!
My only question is if Brainchip sells an IP license to a customer, there should be a clear clause in the contract that the end product must contain the Brainchip IP. This would eliminate companies who are not ready or not serious in using our IP in an end product. I'm not very familiar with how this works so would appreciate someone who is more competent in this area to provide insight.
I am optimistic that patents are there to provide a very good security blanket on our IP and prevent other large, more powerful companies advancing their own IP technology at the expense of our IP and our potential revenues.
Bottom line here is business needs to also be on Brainchip's terms in relation to selling the IP license and contract.
Last edited: