Tothemoon24
Top 20
Agree Dio has the same effect on meAnytime someone drops the "D" word (Doppler), I just start to lose consciousness a little bit.

Agree Dio has the same effect on meAnytime someone drops the "D" word (Doppler), I just start to lose consciousness a little bit.
Well if you follow the reasoning of the Federal Court in GetSwift and ASIC such a conditional agreement with payment conditioned on the first sale would not constitute an agreement that can be announced on the ASX.So Teksun is a good example
"With BrainChip’s Akida processor, we will be able to deliver next-generation AIoT devices that are faster, more efficient, and more intelligent than ever before and not just meet, but exceed the expectations of our customers"
I have no doubt that they will have customers that will have Akida solving their predictive maintenance in the next year.
As a customer progresses to add Akida they are not each going to take out a licencing agreement are they? That can get quite involving legally with individual agreements and Teksun having to contact us each time. Will Teksun take one out on behalf of all their clients. Or the fact we are in partnership with them do we have a partnership agreement for royalty share in the future??
If it is Teksun that takes it out. Why not take it out now and write contract that payment isn't due till first products produced etc.
What are they teaching the young ones these days in school. We did the Doppler Effect in first year science before computers, mobile phones and Google.Anytime someone drops the "D" word (Doppler), I start to lose consciousness a little bit.
Thanks FF. I agree with you and this could be true for all our partnerships prophesee included. So we could have already come to some terms for income from Qualcomm for example and no need to share this as sales are some time off. It would also mean never a license needed??Well if you follow the reasoning of the Federal Court in GetSwift and ASIC such a conditional agreement with payment conditioned on the first sale would not constitute an agreement that can be announced on the ASX.
Why because those sales may never occur and therefore a defined sum of money cannot be calculated by the Board.
My opinion only so take real live legal advice DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
You just gotta 300 minus the 200 X the actual current position / MC + SOI X Pi obtain the square root.....Hi all, can someone please explain to me how we stayed in the ASX200 when we're lucky be in the top 300? I really don't understand.

I don’t want to inform on anyone but was Mercedes Benz eavesdropping on the last podcast where Peter van der Made confessed to having his first version of beneficial artificial general intelligence available for full autonomous driving in approximately 7 years which some might conclude is about 2030????
My speculation and giant dot joining so DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
With only 30 minutes to go before close of week, I found a way to cover my face with egg. Happy to be wrong.Its probably the investment funds selling most if not all their BRN holdings ahead of the ASX 200 index rebalance. I expect a few more days of this before the share price can bounce back.
The question that has me thinking is, if the institutions that are selling down their BRN holdings had also lent their shares out to shorters, wouldn't the shorters have to buy back their shorts also. Should we expect a few large cross trades in the next few days?
Hi all, can someone please explain to me how we stayed in the ASX200 when we're lucky be in the top 300? I really don't understand.

I have no idea either. I mean I only just this minute learnt from Fact Finder what the Doppler Effect was! However, I do know what a Doppelgänger is and obviously it's a much bigger word, which I only know on account of having a striking resemblance to Agelina Jolie. Just kidding.You just gotta 300 minus the 200 X the actual current position / MC + SOI X Pi obtain the square root.....
Yeah me neither![]()
I put my hand up and say I was wrong. I thought we would be out of the asx 200 going by weighted market cap over the period .
My previously mentioned thoughts on some of the partnerships is that they may be joint ventures where both parties agree to co-develop a product (possibly Socionext, Prophesee, ...). This is not a licence agreement. There is no licence fee involved and there are no royalties payable. The parties share in the revenue from sales in proportion to their contribution to the JV.Thanks FF. I agree with you and this could be true for all our partnerships prophesee included. So we could have already come to some terms for income from Qualcomm for example and no need to share this as sales are some time off. It would also mean never a license needed??
Yes that is what Legal Gymnastics can achieve but not sure how it will go as a spectator sport with the best score being achieved for what the public cannot see.Thanks FF. I agree with you and this could be true for all our partnerships prophesee included. So we could have already come to some terms for income from Qualcomm for example and no need to share this as sales are some time off. It would also mean never a license needed??
Your big toes are like two peas in a pod.I have no idea either. I mean I only just this minute learnt from Fact Finder what the Doppler Effect was! However, I do know what a Doppelgänger is and obviously it's a much bigger word, which I only know on account of having a striking resemblance to Agelina Jolie. Just kidding.
Market makers usually hold shares anywhere between a few milli seconds to a few minutes, and not weeks/months/years like those some shareholders.Because the market makers don't panic based on short term price movements like some shareholders.![]()
I knew you were specialI don't mean to brag but I'm on the Top Rated Posts today! I'm the most popular poster on WBT but that 's because I'm the only one posting anything on there.