YES, YES, YES. There we go....! And now you're talking. More, please.If you scroll down to the first listed institution and hover over the text in parenthesis you will see that this fund is part of
State Street Corp and similarly as you go down the list others are also. Here is a brief outline of what this group is from Wiki:
"State Street Corporation is an American[3] financial services and bank holding company headquartered at One Lincoln Street in Boston with operations worldwide. It is the second-oldest continually operating United States bank; its predecessor, Union Bank, was founded in 1792. State Street is ranked 15th on the list of largest banks in the United States by assets. It is one of the largest asset management companies in the world with US$3.9 trillion under management and US$43.3 trillion under custody and administration. It is the largest custodian bank in the world, providing securities services[4][5] and it is considered a systemically important bank by the Financial Stability Board.[6][7]
The company is ranked 316th on the Fortune 500 as of 2022.[8] The company is on the list of the banks that are too big to fail published by the Financial Stability Board.[9]
The company is named after State Street in Boston, which was known as the "Great Street to the Sea" in the 18th century as Boston became a flourishing maritime capital. The company's logo includes a clipper to reflect the maritime industry in Boston during this time."
It is interesting to also look at its website to get an idea about the breadth and scope of its activities and in my opinion why its interest in Brainchip as an investment has some significance. Take the time to think about how many companies both listed and unlisted there are in the world that State Street Corp has available to choose from to include in its portfolio of funds under management and ask yourself is it just by chance that they have decided to include Brainchip across a number of their funds. As we are not on HC I do not expect to have to deal with a nonsense argument like they have not taken a very large position as this is not a valid consideration when they have taken multiple positions across multiple funds and they have literally tens of thousands of companies across all the exchanges around the world as well as unlisted companies to choose from. It is also interesting for the same reasons to take note of @Diogenese observation that Blackrock has also done the same thing across multiple funds.
Obviously these and others do not give any weight to the opinions expressed by AFR,TMH, MF & non aligned WANCAs.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
........onward.