DJM263
LTH - 2015
Has anyone met the famous @Fact Finder ?
Does he have a grey pony tail??
Was that him Sitting Front and Centre!!
Does he have a grey pony tail??
Was that him Sitting Front and Centre!!
Yep! They've realized that to satisfy their avarice they have raked it all in and the global economy is on the verge of collapse, so to preserve their wealth they are prepared to do a little penance and pay a bit of tax so the proles can keep their noses to the grindstone.
[Thinks - "Now where did I put my lamp?"]
I don't know whether it is the shorters or disgruntled shareholders selling as there was nothing in the AGM that would boost the share price in the short term. Probably a bit of both.SHORTING CAMPAIGN in full swing . Most (high %) shares being dumped are via CHAI exchange.
The company is still the same as 9am this morning , no difference.
Those 5 Mil shares WERE definately a planned SHORT. Evidence will show up in 3 days time in ASX data.
Yak52
Hmm, the sort of answer I expected. The elephant in the room that nobody wants to discuss.LOL, where did you crawl out from
I don't know whether it is the shorters or disgruntled shareholders selling as there was nothing in the AGM that would boost the share price in the short term. Probably a bit of both.
Well, have to wait for the next quarterly.
The institutions that want to buy out BRNHmm, the sort of answer I expected. The elephant in the room that nobody wants to discuss.
172 million abstained ( being Peter 162 million ). No's 110 million - not retail, so who wants him out.
Damn! I wanna be there too, and meet the legendim here @Fact Finder u the man in the blue suit that walked past me
well over 3 million daily shorts taken out yesterday alone, yaks right.I don't know whether it is the shorters or disgruntled shareholders selling as there was nothing in the AGM that would boost the share price in the short term. Probably a bit of both.
Well, have to wait for the next quarterly.
Anyone that is disgruntled after that AGM probably shouldn’t have been a shareholder to begin withI don't know whether it is the shorters or disgruntled shareholders selling as there was nothing in the AGM that would boost the share price in the short term. Probably a bit of both.
Well, have to wait for the next quarterly.
Well Intel for one.Hmm, the sort of answer I expected. The elephant in the room that nobody wants to discuss.
172 million abstained ( being Peter 162 million ). No's 110 million - not retail, so who wants him out.
Hmm, the sort of answer I expected. The elephant in the room that nobody wants to discuss.
172 million abstained ( being Peter 162 million ). No's 110 million - not retail, so who wants him out.
Perhaps what Nviso and Bonseyes use for example as a term for phones - deep edge?
View attachment 7577
"For those who haven’t heard of Neil, he was Brainchip’s first CEO, having come with Aziana when Aziana bought Brainchip".I’m still trying to figure out the ramifications of Resolution 2 (the one in which 66% voted for Peter to carry on as a director and 30% against) and Neil Rinaldi’s reaction to it.
For those who haven’t heard of Neil, he was Brainchip’s first CEO, having come with Aziana when Aziana bought Brainchip.
I can’t remember the exact words but he pointed out how important Peter was and is to the company and wondered why so many voted against his reappointment as a director.
When you look at the percentages for most of the other resolutions (carried with a 90-95% share of vote) it does seem odd.
Is the 30 percent driven by instos? If so, why?
Could something nefarious (as Yak put it) be going on?
I met Neil and Peter in 2015 and based on my impressions at the time I can’t believe that Neil’s comments are anything other than genuine indignation at the result of the vote.
Hands up, I’m truly an unsophisticated investor so what do I know. Somebody may have a more informed view.
All my opinion only.
Sorry but before making statements you should know the subject first.
most of those ABSTAINED were holders like myself! We hold our shares in NON banking accounts which means in many cases that we do not hold VOTING rights. 3 of my accounts are as such.
MANY SMSF accounts are like this also. (depending!)
And INSTO holdings generally do not get used for voting much unless there is a T/O in action.
As for that 30% vote against PVDM? Yes interesting when combined with the Shorting campaign being done today. That would be to try to instill no confidence impression in Management and/or Peter.
Someone WANTS this company is my take on the situ. And playing dirty to get it.
Yak52