There are all levels of understanding but if you are familiar with the thesis proposed in The Castle the first level of understanding can actually be called the ‘vibe’.
My level of understanding is one layer above the vibe and is not a technical explanation and possibly wrong and if so I will revert to the vibe if questioned in depth.
AKIDA is trying to work like the brain.
When I look at a familiar scene it is just that familiar, because I have seen it before, and stored some or all of the features.
Now imagine that this familiar scene is overlayed with a grid so that the large area is now made up of a much larger number of smaller familiar scenes all forming the whole scene.
If I turn away from the scene and someone moves something without me being told this is occurring when I turn back and look again I will notice that the chair for example has been moved across the scene to another position which would be another position on the grid. I do not need to reprocess every part of the whole scene to recognise the chair has moved.
So my simple understanding is that this patent is allowing AKIDA to store a scene but impose a grid of points over that stored scene and only process changes in those stored points that occur from the stored image and as each change occurs replace the stored image with the new image by changing only those points of the stored image where the change has occurred.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA