Its a reminder of how tough it is with new never used before ' game changing' products.While these numbers can be a guide for chip sales based on volume, we don't know where they will land. We don't have a complete breakdown of the price point by exact volume, nor the volume existing customers are slated to purchase. We know the worst-case (someone buying up the whole lot) and best-case profit (all items being sold individually), but not what the actual totals will be.
It is also important to note that the chips do not preclude any IP sales if and when those are made. There is also the income they have been reporting through engineering support when assisting customers in creating models for their platform.
Fortunately, we are not looking at just a single revenue stream.
I think I need to be sedated . . .
I might join yaI hear you Yoda.
I've been trying to drown my sorrows in wine and now I've ended up marinating myself.
View attachment 92876
Not sure about the legality of any of this, but what if we pooled together and bought all chips at $4 and then held Parsons and Onsor over a barrel by offering them the chips at $50?
At $4 per unit, we would only need to come up with $1,800,000 to purchase them.
Then, once we sold them, we could potentially pocket about $13 million in profit (after operating costs and tax are taken into account). Maybe a bit less if we get charged with extortion and have to pay for legal representation.
Like I say, I don't know how advisable the above would be, especially the part where we hold Parsons' over a barrel. Oh, and also the part where we wind up in the clanger.
What if we (from the TSE forum) scrape together our savings , buy all the chips at $4, and resell them ourselves to BrainChip’s customers for $50? We split the profits (I figure maybe five people max would even join) and get rich faster than waiting for the share price to rise…Not sure about the legality of any of this, but what if we pooled together and bought all chips at $4 and then held Parsons and Onsor over a barrel by offering them the chips at $50?
At $4 per unit, we would only need to come up with $1,800,000 to purchase them.
Then, once we sold them, we could potentially pocket about $13 million in profit (after operating costs and tax are taken into account). Maybe a bit less if we get charged with extortion and have to pay for legal representation.
Like I say, I don't know how advisable the above would be, especially the part where we hold Parsons' over a barrel. Oh, and also the part where we wind up in the clanger.
I think its time lowered its eyes and looked beneath the 'time sink' adaptability of complex health, defense and auto and took a look at childrens education and fun toys.
AKIDA's adaptative on chip learning is idealy suited to working with kids, learning their individual capabilities, communicating with them , challenging them and gradually increasing their skills.
It would be a great assistance for those working with children with learning disabilities.
Even simple toys such as yo -yo's can be turned into the science fiction of 5 years ago.
Akida could turn a simple yo-yo into a smart, adaptive, gamified learning tool — blending physical play with personalized AI coaching. It’s a playful example of how neuromorphic tech can scale down to even the smallest devices.
Gesture control, voice communication, safety alerts, training, new tricks etc, etc.
The list of possibilities goes on. ....... and no 'time sink' for adoption.
I recognise that image, it’s indelibly etched.I hear you Yoda.
I've been trying to drown my sorrows in wine and now I've ended up marinating myself.
View attachment 92876