When googling for “Brainchip Akida” the other day, I stumbled across an
Interesting Engineering article titled “Can an AI chip that mimics the brain beat the data deluge?”, but couldn’t access it at the time, because it was behind a paywall. (IMO it makes far more sense to spend the equivalent of that 1 US$ on half a dozen BRN shares right now…)
View attachment 89044
Today I discovered a link on the BrainChip website under
Investor Relations that will take you to a PDF document created by Sarah Marker from Bospar (our new PR & Marketing Agency), which contains screenshots of that same article:
investor.brainchip.com
“Brain-inspired chips slash AI power to micro-joules, but 8-bit limits and tooling gaps keep neuromorphic tech niche, for now.”
Learn more
…which links to…
She (or whoever else took those screenshots) unfortunately cut off some lines of text on each page, so in case we have any
IE subscribers here on TSE, they may want to double-check whether we missed out on anything important.
View attachment 89045
View attachment 89027
View attachment 89028
View attachment 89029
View attachment 89030
View attachment 89031
View attachment 89032
View attachment 89034
This article - based on an interview with our CMO Steve Brightfield - should serve as a reality check to those shareholders who see virtually everything about BRN through rose-coloured glasses.
One challenge relating to the adoption of neuromorphic technology is that certain applications benefit more than others:
“It is important to note that the power savings are dramatic only in high sparsity scenarios such as static security cameras, sparse sensor data, and anomaly detection. ‘If the scene is a very active video feed with significant motion, resulting in low sparsity, you can expect considerably less savings,’ Brightfield cautioned.”
The last paragraph, where Steve Brightfield is quoted as saying “We’re still in the early stages of understanding how to best leverage neuromorphic architectures”,
might also be rather sobering for quite a few (especially long-term) shareholders. Our CMO then added: “The real test will be whether these efficiency gains can translate into broader applications as the technology matures.”
Now does that sound like our Chief Marketing Officer were talking about our company as being entirely de-risked and about imminent “generational wealth” for shareholders? Or is it rather an honest and realistic assessment of BrainChip’s current market position?