as long as people take it as a fun, it’s all good. Let us not forget that ChatGPT take it’s informations from different sources and mix it up and create a good read…Me:
what customers of megachips are using megachips ASIC solutions incorporating akida?
ChatGPT said:
MegaChips has incorporated BrainChip's Akida technology into its ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) solutions. This partnership is enabling the development of next-generation edge AI technologies, especially in sectors like automotive, IoT, industrial robotics, and smart devices. MegaChips works with market leaders across various industries, but specific customer names have not been disclosed. The applications of these AI-powered ASIC solutions include home automation, security cameras, autonomous vehicles, medical devices, and gesture control, among others.
Me: I like it![]()

This is the response of my question if he would agree on this statement
“The statement seems generally reasonable and informative but does raise a few points worth considering:
1. Lack of Specific Customer Names: The mention that MegaChips works with market leaders across various industries without disclosing specific customer names could be seen as vague. It would be more credible if some examples were provided, though there could be legitimate reasons for confidentiality.
2. General Scope of Applications: While the sectors mentioned (automotive, IoT, etc.) and the applications (autonomous vehicles, gesture control, etc.) are plausible, the wide scope might appear a bit too broad unless more concrete details are provided. It might leave some readers questioning whether all of these applications are equally well-supported by the partnership.
3. Buzzwords: Terms like “next-generation edge AI” and “AI-powered ASIC solutions” are common in tech marketing. While not necessarily questionable, it would strengthen the statement if more specifics were provided about what sets these solutions apart from competitors’ technologies.
Overall, the statement is plausible but would benefit from more specifics to avoid skepticism.”