BRN Discussion Ongoing

[TECH]

Good morning,

Sean has stated that, to date we haven't lost any engagements with clients or to any other competitors.

Is he referring to since he came onboard, or since we first started engaging under Lou's command ?

I have mentioned this before, I have been told that Mercedes are a "client"....file that under any category you feel appropriate,
we all know that one company did pull back from the brink of signing an agreement for reasons only really known by their own
Board, so that doesn't count as a lost engagement or stolen by another companies technology I'd think, because as Tony has also
stated, some early engagement (potential customers) who felt that the timing wasn't quite right from them at the time, have
surprised the company with recent "re-engagements".

"Once a customer (potential) or otherwise, always a customer"

I can't speak for others here, but I'm still very proud to say that I own Brainchip stock and always share our story with anybody
interested in the future direction our company is heading in....to the top of the peak.

AKD I & II

 

[Diogenese]

"Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that customer list should therefore read:

1. Renesas
2. Megachips
3. Ford
4. Mercedes
5. Vorago
6. NASA
7. Valeo
8. ISL
9. ???
10. ???

Which leaves us with only two mystery customers that fall into the category of either being an EAP customer or have used Akida technology to develop a proof of concept, as we would have found out about any additional IP licensees via price-sensitive ASX announcements"


It certainly seems, that the EAPs are indeed more of a handful, as I was thinking more along the lines, of at least a couple of dozen.

Having the EAPs, under the same "10 customer" banner (according to the slide) as POC and IP licencees, muddys the water further..

We know, there were at least 2 licences (from revenue) taken out, by customers of MegaChips and these are not considered "our" customers.

I don't personally think Renesas, is considered an EAP, but I do MegaChips.

Our current relationship with Ford is unknown, apparently there is no longer any reference to them anywhere, in BRN material.
Are they "still" considered a customer, or EAP?

What are the "Rules of Engagement" here, as far as what the Company reports to us, of what they consider customers, or EAPs?

The emphasis on NDAs is strong with this one..
Any major engagements (after the c' up with Ford) are likely to be kept tightly under wraps (which would make the comment by Chris, if as alluded, a similar one).


There's a saying I really like, which originates in Taoism.

"You cannot clear muddied water with your hand. — Who is there that can make muddy water clear? But if allowed to remain still, it will become clear of itself"

View attachment 65367


And so we wait...

But maybe if you centrifuged it ...

 

[7für7]

Literally todays shareprice this morning

 

[db1969oz]

Over 8 million reported shorts taken out Friday!

 

[Diogenese]

Over 8 million reported shorts taken out Friday!

... and they're working their magic already.

 

[DK6161]

Good morning,

Sean has stated that, to date we haven't lost any engagements with clients or to any other competitors.

Is he referring to since he came onboard, or since we first started engaging under Lou's command ?

I have mentioned this before, I have been told that Mercedes are a "client"....file that under any category you feel appropriate,
we all know that one company did pull back from the brink of signing an agreement for reasons only really known by their own
Board, so that doesn't count as a lost engagement or stolen by another companies technology I'd think, because as Tony has also
stated, some early engagement (potential customers) who felt that the timing wasn't quite right from them at the time, have
surprised the company with recent "re-engagements".

"Once a customer (potential) or otherwise, always a customer"

I can't speak for others here, but I'm still very proud to say that I own Brainchip stock and always share our story with anybody
interested in the future direction our company is heading in....to the top of the peak.

AKD I & II

Very reassuring words, but to say you are proud of the company is utter bullsh*t.
Yes the the future potential is great , but there is nothing to brag about at the moment.

Explosion of sales = Fail
Watch the financials = Fail
Sean has promised a lot in the past and continue to do the same again and again. Shareholders kept in the dark with nothing but fluffy bullsh*t.
Rinse and repeat until the next AGM.

Glad I sold a few weeks ago. Saved me another 30% decline.
Before this post gets reported and moderated by the same people, just letting you know that I still have a huge believe that the company has great potential, so I might jump back in around 15c or even 10c.

Not advice. DYOR!

 

[rgupta]

"Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that customer list should therefore read:

1. Renesas
2. Megachips
3. Ford
4. Mercedes
5. Vorago
6. NASA
7. Valeo
8. ISL
9. ???
10. ???

Which leaves us with only two mystery customers that fall into the category of either being an EAP customer or have used Akida technology to develop a proof of concept, as we would have found out about any additional IP licensees via price-sensitive ASX announcements"


It certainly seems, that the EAPs are indeed more of a handful, as I was thinking more along the lines, of at least a couple of dozen.

Having the EAPs, under the same "10 customer" banner (according to the slide) as POC and IP licencees, muddys the water further..

We know, there were at least 2 licences (from revenue) taken out, by customers of MegaChips and these are not considered "our" customers.

I don't personally think Renesas, is considered an EAP, but I do MegaChips.

Our current relationship with Ford is unknown, apparently there is no longer any reference to them anywhere, in BRN material.
Are they "still" considered a customer, or EAP?

What are the "Rules of Engagement" here, as far as what the Company reports to us, of what they consider customers, or EAPs?

The emphasis on NDAs is strong with this one..
Any major engagements (after the c' up with Ford) are likely to be kept tightly under wraps (which would make the comment by Chris, if as alluded, a similar one).


There's a saying I really like, which originates in Taoism.

"You cannot clear muddied water with your hand. — Who is there that can make muddy water clear? But if allowed to remain still, it will become clear of itself"

View attachment 65367


And so we wait...

The list can include
Edge impulse
Ant 61
Nviso
Etc

 

[Iseki]

The list can include
Edge impulse
Ant 61
Nviso
Etc

I think they will more likely7 be NDA's not EAP's

 

[Iseki]

"Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that customer list should therefore read:

1. Renesas
2. Megachips
3. Ford
4. Mercedes
5. Vorago
6. NASA
7. Valeo
8. ISL
9. ???
10. ???"

--
The customer list for us needs to be a list of companies capable of licensing from us, so will need to on-sell 2 million chips with akida. So that narrows it down a bit. I believe there are 8 of them since there were 8 chip designs that BRN worked on for potential clients.

I would love it to be a communications company and a household products company.

 

[Bravo]

Imagine if we scored both Meta and Apple AT THE SAME TIME?

Apple Partners with Meta to Bring Cutting-Edge AI to Its Products​

ByMichał Nawrocki​

2024-06-24

Apple and Meta have recently collaborated on integrating advanced generative AI technology into Apple’s suite of products. This strategic move marks a significant development in Apple’s AI strategy, positioning itself to compete with industry leaders in artificial intelligence.

Instead of relying solely on its in-house AI capabilities, Apple has teamed up with Meta to incorporate the latter’s innovative generative AI model into Apple Intelligence. This partnership follows a previous deal with OpenAI, enhancing Apple’s AI features with the use of ChatGPT technology.

With the aim of revamping its virtual assistant Siri, Apple is set to introduce AI-infused upgrades. These upgrades will enable users to generate personalized emojis and receive summarized email content, all powered by cutting-edge AI technology.
The challenge for Apple lies in seamlessly integrating AI capabilities, such as those found in ChatGPT, while upholding its strict user privacy and security standards. By leveraging Meta’s generative AI model, Apple looks to enhance its products without compromising on user data protection.
As the demand for generative AI features continues to grow, Apple’s collaboration with Meta signals a strategic shift towards staying competitive in the AI landscape. This partnership paves the way for future advancements in AI technology within Apple’s ecosystem.

Apple Expands Its AI Endeavors Through Collaboration with Meta

In the latest development, Apple has expanded its foray into artificial intelligence by partnering with Meta, the parent company of Facebook, to integrate cutting-edge AI technology into its suite of products. This collaboration aims to bring innovative generative AI capabilities to Apple’s offerings, further solidifying its position in the competitive AI landscape.
Key Questions:
1. How will the partnership between Apple and Meta impact the user experience of Apple products?
2. What specific AI features can consumers expect with this integration?
3. What sets Meta’s generative AI model apart from other AI technologies in the market?
Key Challenges and Controversies:
One of the primary challenges for Apple in this partnership will be ensuring seamless integration of Meta’s AI capabilities while maintaining its renowned standards of user privacy and data security. Balancing the benefits of advanced AI features with user data protection is crucial to prevent potential privacy concerns and controversies.
Advantages:
– By collaborating with Meta, Apple gains access to cutting-edge generative AI technology that can enhance the functionality of its products, particularly Siri and other AI-driven features.
– The partnership allows Apple to expand its AI capabilities beyond its in-house expertise, potentially offering users more innovative and personalized experiences.

Disadvantages:
– There may be concerns regarding data privacy and security, especially with the integration of a third-party AI model into Apple’s ecosystem. Safeguarding user data while leveraging Meta’s technology will be a key consideration.
– Depending heavily on external partnerships for AI advancements may pose challenges in maintaining a cohesive AI strategy in the long run.
As the demand for generative AI features grows, Apple’s collaboration with Meta signals a strategic shift towards staying competitive in the AI landscape. This partnership not only drives innovation within Apple’s products but also opens avenues for future AI advancements leveraging Meta’s expertise.
For more information on advancements in AI technology, visit Apple’s official website.

Smartphone Magazine - Smartphone Magazine

smartphonemagazine.nl

 

[Jacob Kiraz]

Imagine if we scored both Meta and Apple AT THE SAME TIME?


View attachment 65370

Apple Partners with Meta to Bring Cutting-Edge AI to Its Products​

ByMichał Nawrocki​

2024-06-24

Apple and Meta have recently collaborated on integrating advanced generative AI technology into Apple’s suite of products. This strategic move marks a significant development in Apple’s AI strategy, positioning itself to compete with industry leaders in artificial intelligence.

Instead of relying solely on its in-house AI capabilities, Apple has teamed up with Meta to incorporate the latter’s innovative generative AI model into Apple Intelligence. This partnership follows a previous deal with OpenAI, enhancing Apple’s AI features with the use of ChatGPT technology.

With the aim of revamping its virtual assistant Siri, Apple is set to introduce AI-infused upgrades. These upgrades will enable users to generate personalized emojis and receive summarized email content, all powered by cutting-edge AI technology.
The challenge for Apple lies in seamlessly integrating AI capabilities, such as those found in ChatGPT, while upholding its strict user privacy and security standards. By leveraging Meta’s generative AI model, Apple looks to enhance its products without compromising on user data protection.
As the demand for generative AI features continues to grow, Apple’s collaboration with Meta signals a strategic shift towards staying competitive in the AI landscape. This partnership paves the way for future advancements in AI technology within Apple’s ecosystem.

Apple Expands Its AI Endeavors Through Collaboration with Meta

In the latest development, Apple has expanded its foray into artificial intelligence by partnering with Meta, the parent company of Facebook, to integrate cutting-edge AI technology into its suite of products. This collaboration aims to bring innovative generative AI capabilities to Apple’s offerings, further solidifying its position in the competitive AI landscape.
Key Questions:
1. How will the partnership between Apple and Meta impact the user experience of Apple products?
2. What specific AI features can consumers expect with this integration?
3. What sets Meta’s generative AI model apart from other AI technologies in the market?
Key Challenges and Controversies:
One of the primary challenges for Apple in this partnership will be ensuring seamless integration of Meta’s AI capabilities while maintaining its renowned standards of user privacy and data security. Balancing the benefits of advanced AI features with user data protection is crucial to prevent potential privacy concerns and controversies.
Advantages:
– By collaborating with Meta, Apple gains access to cutting-edge generative AI technology that can enhance the functionality of its products, particularly Siri and other AI-driven features.
– The partnership allows Apple to expand its AI capabilities beyond its in-house expertise, potentially offering users more innovative and personalized experiences.

Disadvantages:
– There may be concerns regarding data privacy and security, especially with the integration of a third-party AI model into Apple’s ecosystem. Safeguarding user data while leveraging Meta’s technology will be a key consideration.
– Depending heavily on external partnerships for AI advancements may pose challenges in maintaining a cohesive AI strategy in the long run.
As the demand for generative AI features grows, Apple’s collaboration with Meta signals a strategic shift towards staying competitive in the AI landscape. This partnership not only drives innovation within Apple’s products but also opens avenues for future AI advancements leveraging Meta’s expertise.
For more information on advancements in AI technology, visit Apple’s official website.

Smartphone Magazine - Smartphone Magazine

smartphonemagazine.nl

Omg Please keep dreaming it's a turn on

 

[7für7]

Bravo soon….

 

[Shadow59]

You've got that wrong 7.
This is Bravo in real life

 

[7für7]

@ shadow…At the moment she is for sure “wondering women”

 

[Food4 thought]

Imagine if we scored both Meta and Apple AT THE SAME TIME?


View attachment 65370

Apple Partners with Meta to Bring Cutting-Edge AI to Its Products​

ByMichał Nawrocki​

2024-06-24

Apple and Meta have recently collaborated on integrating advanced generative AI technology into Apple’s suite of products. This strategic move marks a significant development in Apple’s AI strategy, positioning itself to compete with industry leaders in artificial intelligence.

Instead of relying solely on its in-house AI capabilities, Apple has teamed up with Meta to incorporate the latter’s innovative generative AI model into Apple Intelligence. This partnership follows a previous deal with OpenAI, enhancing Apple’s AI features with the use of ChatGPT technology.

With the aim of revamping its virtual assistant Siri, Apple is set to introduce AI-infused upgrades. These upgrades will enable users to generate personalized emojis and receive summarized email content, all powered by cutting-edge AI technology.
The challenge for Apple lies in seamlessly integrating AI capabilities, such as those found in ChatGPT, while upholding its strict user privacy and security standards. By leveraging Meta’s generative AI model, Apple looks to enhance its products without compromising on user data protection.
As the demand for generative AI features continues to grow, Apple’s collaboration with Meta signals a strategic shift towards staying competitive in the AI landscape. This partnership paves the way for future advancements in AI technology within Apple’s ecosystem.

Apple Expands Its AI Endeavors Through Collaboration with Meta

In the latest development, Apple has expanded its foray into artificial intelligence by partnering with Meta, the parent company of Facebook, to integrate cutting-edge AI technology into its suite of products. This collaboration aims to bring innovative generative AI capabilities to Apple’s offerings, further solidifying its position in the competitive AI landscape.
Key Questions:
1. How will the partnership between Apple and Meta impact the user experience of Apple products?
2. What specific AI features can consumers expect with this integration?
3. What sets Meta’s generative AI model apart from other AI technologies in the market?
Key Challenges and Controversies:
One of the primary challenges for Apple in this partnership will be ensuring seamless integration of Meta’s AI capabilities while maintaining its renowned standards of user privacy and data security. Balancing the benefits of advanced AI features with user data protection is crucial to prevent potential privacy concerns and controversies.
Advantages:
– By collaborating with Meta, Apple gains access to cutting-edge generative AI technology that can enhance the functionality of its products, particularly Siri and other AI-driven features.
– The partnership allows Apple to expand its AI capabilities beyond its in-house expertise, potentially offering users more innovative and personalized experiences.

Disadvantages:
– There may be concerns regarding data privacy and security, especially with the integration of a third-party AI model into Apple’s ecosystem. Safeguarding user data while leveraging Meta’s technology will be a key consideration.
– Depending heavily on external partnerships for AI advancements may pose challenges in maintaining a cohesive AI strategy in the long run.
As the demand for generative AI features grows, Apple’s collaboration with Meta signals a strategic shift towards staying competitive in the AI landscape. This partnership not only drives innovation within Apple’s products but also opens avenues for future AI advancements leveraging Meta’s expertise.
For more information on advancements in AI technology, visit Apple’s official website.

Smartphone Magazine - Smartphone Magazine

smartphonemagazine.nl

Imagine if we got just one contract any contract what a surprise that would be lol………

 

[IloveLamp]

Ahmed Zaky Ghonem on LinkedIn: I am delighted to share that my MSc research work at The Ohio State…

I am delighted to share that my MSc research work at The Ohio State University has been accepted for publication at three different IEEE international…

www.linkedin.com

 

[AARONASX]

Ford - Major breakthrough!

https://fordauthority.com/2024/06/ford-close-to-achieving-level-3-autonomy-farley/amp/

 

[Diogenese]

Ahmed Zaky Ghonem on LinkedIn: I am delighted to share that my MSc research work at The Ohio State…

I am delighted to share that my MSc research work at The Ohio State University has been accepted for publication at three different IEEE international…

www.linkedin.com

View attachment 65378 View attachment 65379

Well, it's digital SNN, so it's in the same ballpark, but 512 neurons 256k synapses doesn't really qualify for the minor league.

I'd have thought that an Nvidia SoC Design Engineer would be working on something with a little more oomph. Still, you've got to crawl before you can walk.

Funnily enuf, Nvidia has many patents which include a NN as a functional item, but I don't recall that they have any patents for a NN.

 

[schuey]

Literally todays shareprice this morning

View attachment 65368

Whole market over all

 

[wilzy123]

Well, it's digital SNN, so it's in the same ballpark, but 512 neurons 256k synapses doesn't really qualify for the minor league.

I'd have thought that an Nvidia SoC Design Engineer would be working on something with a little more oomph. Still, you've got to crawl before you can walk.



View attachment 65384



Funnily enuf, Nvidia has many patents which include a NN as a functional item, but I don't recall that they have any patents for a NN.

We need @Iseki input to confirm for sure