Pom down under
Top 20
Not looked at the sp, so did we end up green after a few shocking years?
BIN BOY
do you work for the deflection team at IR?………give them a call if not…..you will get a start on Monday!
I weakened and adjusted mine to 16c 20 minutes before close. Shit.......Interesting observation. My order was triggered at 15.5c and only partially filled at close of market. Subsequent nearly over 1 million shares traded after market @15.5 c and my order remains at top of the heap partially filled....
Instos trading to themselves confirmed as fact!...
This is why we are 15cInteresting observation. My order was triggered at 15.5c and only partially filled at close of market. Subsequent nearly over 1 million shares traded after market @15.5 c and my order remains at top of the heap partially filled....
Instos trading to themselves confirmed as fact!...
Psychologists say you post your personality. It always comes through. Pretty much says it all.That's gold Proga
So you think he's not stupid, but still an idiot
Schnitzel lover, isn't an attention seeking troll, in my opinion.
His agenda is simple, whether he is acting on his own accord, or for someone else.
He seeks to sow doubt and fear, for his own or others benefit.
So that people will sell and either he or other party's, can get their orders filled/stock returned.
He will say, that he has no intention of buying, until he sees a change in trend.
Although, by his own accounts, he has already been in and out several times.
The fact that he is not a complete simpleton, is why I reply to "some" of his posts, when he says things that are deliberately misleading, or untrue.
His post about ARM, having a "loss making" business model, which BrainChip had adopted, took me all of a 20 second Google search, to disprove.
He is smart enough to work that out, if he puts in even a "little" delving, before he posts.
But Truth/honesty, is not a good tool for him.
Hi @TECH, I agree with your sense of BRN having turned the corner, but my view is that: we won't know that for sure until we see consistent and growing monies in the 4Cs. The eco system is becoming more compelling and is growing very fast lately, and with some very exciting names, so that all continues to build an underlying belief. So I'm thinking that the next (nearly due) 4C probably won't see much revenue and we know that there are no new contracts, however my hope is that we begin to see something in the March Qtrly
I have strong respect for your belief and steadfastness, and on the whole am very appreciative of what you bring here.
Excitement is something that I feel, and I like to be excited, however at times excitement can simply be the front runner for a let down, so I watch my excitement levels particularly with regard to investments, and I certainly watch very carefully the "thing" of getting attached to outcomes, not saying I've got that lifetime challenge down, but I'm playing at being mindful there.
While the education grows here, none of us long termers knew when we initially began building positions that the company would be shifting to an IP sales model, and the extended timeframes that this move would entail, even now many newer investors still do not understand the process and how it is impacting income for BRN. So income has become a slow burn, this has not been helped by the macro economic environment we now find enveloping the world, and war never helps anything, management have played that card and it's obvious it hasn't helped.
I have mentioned this before, and I will say it again, I am not so sanguine or bullish as some here about global economic prospects going forward, that doesn't mean I am all that negative, but a big fascination of mine (and has long been) is with regard to political, historic and socio/economic research, and there is "stuff" going on out there that concerns me, and I am certainly mindful of it - I read widely and a lot. Primarily I want success and I hope and pray (again) for good things and bountiful returns for those here who are invested.
So this concern is not so much with the disruptive tech which BRN is working on taking to the world, but rather that things here on earth don't get too wacky (messed up) before BRN/Akidas can get widespread traction out there in the world of business/commerce, that is another timeframe I look at.
I'm confident in what BRN are doing and I am well enough researched to know that the tech is outstanding. The company have certainly made mistakes, and some of that has been /is very annoying to me, but I think they are building the basis for success into the future (but as I said there are real concerns there IMO). On the management front if I were at the AGM I would have questions about their failure to use the ASX platform to announce a plethora of worthwhile information to Australian investors. I am well aware others will have different questions
There have been mistakes, there has also clearly been very good progress, I don't expect perfect, but as Sean said he should be judged on results, and I would also take that as: he would therefore be responsible for what has or hasn't happened.
With regard to Peter I remain a big fan (although it is IMO unfortunate that he made the "explosive growth" remark, but I think at the time certain external economic factors had not taken hold) Peter has invented something that could change the world, which would make him a person of some genius, he has for a long time come across as a humble man of high integrity. But I wouldn't know if money was a driving passion for him, and to be quite honest I hope that it is. So I don't agree with your sentiment @TECH, with regard to "and there within lies the problem for many". I am here to make money and am totally comfortable with that sentiment.
I don't love BRN, but I have not sold a single share (and am thinking of buying more, it's a few years, but maybe I will) and at present I remain in the green, however I do have empathy for holders here who are taking a beating (i really think that the Mercedes reveal was unfortunate, and created unrealistic expectations and set many retail investors up for bad manipulation by malevolent actors). Having said that I don't like some who come here wanting to be serial whingers who apparently take pleasure in slagging off other people here who continue to do excellent research and remain strong in their investment sentiment. That kind of behaviour is what losers get into. If you have something to say, yes say it, but needing to say it several times a day, every day, means you have most likely got.....well good luck with it.
At the end of the day we all pushed the buy button, and as far as I am concerned, that is where the ultimate responsibility lies - observe what is moving inside and if you need, or want to, take action. And as you might say Tech have a good evening.
Hi McHaleA question here @Fact Finder, I have asked this here previously but am not aware of anyone answering my question, so I ask again.
Do we know who was responsible for the vote against the remuneration report specifically, as I understand it there would not have been enough retail people present at the AGM to support that vote, so my thinking it must have been via a lot of retail proxies.
Usually from what I have observed with regard to remuneration strikes, for retail investors to be coherent enough to support a strike there needs to be widespread dissatisfaction and some activist investors who promote and disseminate info to promote said strike, I am not aware of any such being widely discussed at that time, either here or HC.
Or could it have been an institutional holder(s), who had unknown motives. I have asked you because I believe it has been mentioned that you were present at the meeting.
You also state that the top 1000 shareholders own 70% of SOI, so 51% of votes could be garnered from top 1000, we know PVDM & AM have significant holdings but not enough to cover 51%, and I am curious about the intents of some institutional holders because of a pattern of block voting at AGMs. I have no definitive info to support this whatsoever, but there is a pattern which I illustrate below
2023 remuneration vote below
View attachment 54699
Further I am now going back to the 2022 AGM where there was a large block of votes which opposed the re-election of PVDM to the Board. This shocked me at the time and I believe others here felt the same way, Peter had been installed as acting CEO after the resignation Lou Di Nardo in March 2021, but stepped down from that role in Nov 2021 when Sean Hehir was appointed to that role.
So again this was another significant block of votes which must have been an organized retail group, or powerful organic retail reaction against PVDM, who to all intents and purposes was a respected Board member and CTO. Or was it an institutional actor?
Below is 2022 vote targeting PVDM
View attachment 54696
I am also aware that there was another significant block of votes opposed to the remuneration package at the 2021 AGM, so there has been ongoing significant blocks of votes opposing remuneration for some time.
2021 vote below
View attachment 54697
So if anyone else other than Fact Finder has any thinking about these consistent and significant blocks of votes at our AGMs, I would appreciate feedback you may have. I have no trust whatsoever with regard to the ASX and their total lack of respect or regulation toward the fair treatment of retail market participants, or the absence of any apparent disposition on their part to prevent corrupt and malicious SP manipulation.
nice Arm post on LinkedIn a couple Hours ago
View attachment 54731
Listen to 'This is Our Mission' podcast on edge AI | Arm posted on the topic | LinkedIn
How can we bring advanced AI capabilities to edge devices and meet the growing demand for on-device AI? 🚀 In the latest episode of the 'This is Our Mission'…www.linkedin.com
Talks about Edge/On Device AI
MitroHi McHale
All I have is a theory. Go back to the beginnings and who created the company. Who still holds large very large parcels from that time. Who liked to be on centre stage with Peter and Anil. Think about what the company looked like after the arrival of Antonio and Sean and the subtle power shift and who might have experienced relevance deprivation and needed to kick a few shins to say don’t ignore me.
No evidence at all just a theory but ask yourself apart from a muscle flex what was the practical effect of the vote. As far as I could tell it changed nothing.
My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
Memories light the corners of my mind.
Originally Posted by Daimler Media Center 4 Jan 2022
EXTRACT ONLY
View attachment 54057
VISION EQXX – taking electric range and efficiency to an entirely new level
Range and efficiency are set to define the electric era. Exceptional range will make electric cars suitable for every journey and help to increase overall adoption.media.mbusa.com
Funny that, because in the CLA Class it's all about efficiency too.
I wonder what Gerrit Ecke meant when he said the CLA Class carries the genes of the Vision EQXX?
View attachment 54060
View attachment 54059
LOVE IT!nice Arm post on LinkedIn a couple Hours ago
View attachment 54731
Listen to 'This is Our Mission' podcast on edge AI | Arm posted on the topic | LinkedIn
How can we bring advanced AI capabilities to edge devices and meet the growing demand for on-device AI? 🚀 In the latest episode of the 'This is Our Mission'…www.linkedin.com