Thanks @Mt09, so when "akd1500 and 22FDX" was mentioned this is more related to our IP could potentially be implemented on SoC produced using the 22FDX platform?22nm FDX is the foundry process..
Last edited:
Thanks @Mt09, so when "akd1500 and 22FDX" was mentioned this is more related to our IP could potentially be implemented on SoC produced using the 22FDX platform?22nm FDX is the foundry process..
Morning fellow brners, great posts!
I will do some research over the weekend when im back at work but in the meantime picked up this little beauty and only fitting i open it at $3.89.
Bring it on BRN
View attachment 54048
Not sure I could wait that long.Morning fellow brners, great posts!
I will do some research over the weekend when im back at work but in the meantime picked up this little beauty and only fitting i open it at $3.89.
Bring it on BRN
View attachment 54048
Podcast removed while photo changed? Don’t seem to be able to access it anywhere?
That’s it, akd1500 reference chip has been made in 22nmFDX. It has been proven in the process so people looking to implement the ip can have confidence in our ip across multiple foundries ie global foundries and tsmc etc.Thanks @Mt09, so when "akd1500 and 22FDX" was mentioned this is more related to our IP could potentially be implemented on SoC produced using the 22FDX platform?
Expect, the person featured in the podcast photo is not Pedro Pachuca. Instead, it is a university student by the same name specialising in AI, with no connection to Global Foundaries. The image has been obtained from the first search result on LinkedIn.
The real Pedro:
View attachment 54045
When one of the invited guests in the podcasts states after being asked about what they have just seen being presented by Brainchip at CES@Fact Finder
Do you still think that mistakes are no problem?
Brainchip is having a major problem with mistakes!!!
What do you think their partners/customers will think how reliable BrainChip‘s quality is?? What does that do to BrainChip‘s reputation?
@Fact Finder
Do you still think that mistakes are no problem?
Brainchip is having a major problem with mistakes!!!
What do you think their partners/customers will think how reliable BrainChip‘s quality is?? What does that do to BrainChip‘s reputation?
Thanks FF, we must have posted at the same time. Just the post I was looking for.When one of the invited guests in the podcasts states after being asked about what they have just seen being presented by Brainchip at CES
“Well thanks for asking what I saw was eye opening, the ease of scalability is what the market wants and you have nailed it to the point your AKIDA technology is
clearly disruptive but unfortunately even though English is not my first language I noticed a typo on one of your presentation slides so I will not be proceeding with our plans to implement AKIDA technology and will be throwing away a years worth of planning and research”
Until then I will continue to believe that typos are not earth shattering as you like to promote
As for other errors todays use of the wrong photograph was notified by me to the company and they have responded.
What this error has done though is place those who troll and manipulate in a difficult position.
Do they make much of this error which will bring attention to the substance of the podcast and the ringing endorsement of AKIDA technology as eye opening and disruptive rather than burying it in conversation after conversation about LDA Capital and whether an an anonymous poster still thinks typos are of little consequence.
As usual my opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
PS: It is interesting that on the one hand posters will argue that typos indicate that Brainchip is dead in the water yet on the other hand they hang around instead of moving on to successful typo free disruptive technology stocks.
When one of the invited guests in the podcasts states after being asked about what they have just seen being presented by Brainchip at CES
“Well thanks for asking what I saw was eye opening, the ease of scalability is what the market wants and you have nailed it to the point your AKIDA technology is
clearly disruptive but unfortunately even though English is not my first language I noticed a typo on one of your presentation slides so I will not be proceeding with our plans to implement AKIDA technology and will be throwing away a years worth of planning and research”
Until then I will continue to believe that typos are not earth shattering as you like to promote
As for other errors todays use of the wrong photograph was notified by me to the company and they have responded.
What this error has done though is place those who troll and manipulate in a difficult position.
Do they make much of this error which will bring attention to the substance of the podcast and the ringing endorsement of AKIDA technology as eye opening and disruptive rather than burying it in conversation after conversation about LDA Capital and whether an an anonymous poster still thinks typos are of little consequence.
As usual my opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
PS: It is interesting that on the one hand posters will argue that typos indicate that Brainchip is dead in the water yet on the other hand they hang around instead of moving on to successful typo free disruptive technology stocks.
Nice pick up in establishing the connection! "Chief Revenue Officer" - hopefully, Nandan asks probing questions and discusses the transitioning of prospects modeling through Edge Impulse to direct engagements with Brainchip, eventually leading to IP sales.Going by the picture.
View attachment 54052
View attachment 54053
I believe we will be a podcast with Spencer Huang front Edge Impulse . Just a me speculation
View attachment 54056
Learning
I think you are reading lot more into the "Trolls" than you need. I run a successful business and if I was to ask for my staff to use social media to post a meeting I had with someone and they then complied but put up a photo of an entirely different person, I would be well pissed. Yes, we all make typos and mistakes, but it doesn't mean we don't try better next time. You have posted maybe 3 or 4 times in the recent past about this issue, but all have been issues. How many is okay?When one of the invited guests in the podcasts states after being asked about what they have just seen being presented by Brainchip at CES
“Well thanks for asking what I saw was eye opening, the ease of scalability is what the market wants and you have nailed it to the point your AKIDA technology is
clearly disruptive but unfortunately even though English is not my first language I noticed a typo on one of your presentation slides so I will not be proceeding with our plans to implement AKIDA technology and will be throwing away a years worth of planning and research”
Until then I will continue to believe that typos are not earth shattering as you like to promote
As for other errors todays use of the wrong photograph was notified by me to the company and they have responded.
What this error has done though is place those who troll and manipulate in a difficult position.
Do they make much of this error which will bring attention to the substance of the podcast and the ringing endorsement of AKIDA technology as eye opening and disruptive rather than burying it in conversation after conversation about LDA Capital and whether an an anonymous poster still thinks typos are of little consequence.
As usual my opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
PS: It is interesting that on the one hand posters will argue that typos indicate that Brainchip is dead in the water yet on the other hand they hang around instead of moving on to successful typo free disruptive technology stocks.
Should I rage-sell all of my shares? yes or noI think you are reading lot more into the "Trolls" than you need. I run a successful business and if I was to ask for my staff to use social media to post a meeting I had with someone and they then complied but put up a photo of an entirely different person, I would be well pissed. Yes, we all make typos and mistakes, but it doesn't mean we don't try better next time. You have posted maybe 3 or 4 times in the recent past about this issue, but all have been issues. How many is okay?
Will it stop investors? no. (Does that make it okay? no)
Will it stop a partnership? no (Does that make it okay? no)
Is it the first time of a stupid error? No
Was the podcast a good endorsement for BRN, Yes.
If I was Sean, i would be having a chat to whoever the error was made by. Sorry, just not professional.