LexLuther77
Regular
lol looks that way… gives Sean plenty of time to pick up some shares on market thenDon’t expect any revenue this year either then.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/467ed/467ed6f98b7ae7118690829bcebcef4bad51c58c" alt="Winking face with tongue :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: 😜"
lol looks that way… gives Sean plenty of time to pick up some shares on market thenDon’t expect any revenue this year either then.
Maybe I’m just too bias ,
Did you see a point on why they called these meetings, and did you get anything out of themTo be honest mate, I’ve been invited too and attended a couple of these meets, and had an invite to the last which I never attended. It isn’t like you describe at all. Nothing below deck is discussed, and the Brainchip guys are very careful about what they say. It’s more about technical questions than anything else.
Additional minimum draw down of 12 million dolllars...Maybe I’m just too bias ,
If this agreement was for 30 million plus I be concerned .
For me this is a hidden message of expected revenue this year .
They may need 12 million & 1 cent , got to cover basesAdditional minimum draw down of 12 million dolllars...
Guess that’s another 40 million shorts available to all our lovely friends.
Just Tony doing his job I think. I believe it’s arranged between Tony and a shareholder he’s in regular contact with. The shareholder then invited other as a group. I don’t believe the company chooses who the select are.Did you see a point on why they called these meetings, and did you get anything out of them
Most companies have these types of meetings with holders. Usually larger long term holders.To be honest mate, I’ve been invited too and attended a couple of these meets, and had an invite to the last which I never attended. It isn’t like you describe at all. Nothing below deck is discussed, and the Brainchip guys are very careful about what they say. It’s more about technical questions than anything else.
Thanks for your respectful post and your comments contained therein .....Hi @Xray1, I do agree with your sentiment up to a point with regard to the meetings you are referring to. It may have been a better look with some shareholders, if BRN had informed the market about those meetings, but I said "it may have", because the company does have discretion in that regard, so the choice to inform or not, is up to the company.
The vast majority of shareholders would most likely have not been interested because they know that under the ASX constant disclosure rules, that any news of great importance (price sensitive) has to be announced. However I have lost count of the number of times you have put up critical posts on this matter, which really is not of any great significance. I take it that, because the share price is in the gutter that numerous holders who were previously, in better days (pricewise), more positive about BRN have become inclined to be rather pessimistic or cynical when they post here or HC. This is pretty typical human behaviour, and I don't particularly have any judgements to make about that, however if people become obsessed to the point where they need to go over the same stuff every day, then you might think that they would be better off letting go of the thing that is upsetting them.
I might add that people who obsessively want to support the basis of their investment, could perhaps be regarded as looking for mutual confirmation bias, again I don't have any judgements to make about this, and my position is that I have quite some respect and appreciation for the technical information and insights that I am able to access here, and if there is some blatant upramping amongst some, then I just have to accept that as part of the deal with regard to accessing their information, but constant repetition of positive or negative is really a waste of time for me I think people who come here need to be able to own what it is that motivates them, this could/may in some way help more constructive dialogue.
Speaking for myself, my major grievance with BRN is their abject failure in terms of using the ASX platform to announce the good work they are doing with regard to building out an eco-system and other news worthy work they are doing to promote the uptake of our technology, but I don't post about it even once every month, let alone every week or day.
Getting back to (that meeting) the main reason I regard this meeting matter as relatively insignificant, is because the company BRN, holds an AGM every year and only a small number go and attend (even fewer ask questions), so as a fraction of the 35,000 SHers you mention, that number becomes minutely microscopic, so what's all the fuss about. Also, please note this view of mine, could have also been addressed to a good number of others who post here.
It was very good to see the BRN had a positive day to begin 2024, have a great new year everyone, and here's to more green.
Great! Please make sure the dot includes the words "BrainChip" or "Akida" and not just "fruit juicer".That's why they have a meeting with a select few, Guys we need you on board everybodies expectations are well ahead of where we actually are, Fact Finder I'll do more Dot joining and post that and fend off any Strike notice,
Put the shares back in the drawer for another year Didn't Tech mention 2025?
Nek minit 2027
Hm?Could someone tell me how to find out about where I look
to find out how far up the ladder one is with BRN shares with
stock holders in the Company?
You're right. You are too bias mate.Maybe I’m just too bias ,
If this agreement was for 30 million plus I be concerned .
For me this is a hidden message of expected revenue this year .
100% With Brainchip everything is mostly under NDA's and it has everybody guessing,Thanks for your respectful post and your comments contained therein .....
but as you can well appreciate, is that we all have the right to express our own views and biases here as individuals whether they be good and/or bad.
Yep, not the announcement I was hoping for.Don’t expect any revenue this year either then.
Cheers DKYou're right. You are too bias mate.
Let's hope the money is spent wisely eg on a SiFive+Akida2 tapeout + bulk demo chips.having access to funding from our well-respected partners at LDA Capital, strengthens our business continuity position against well-capitalized and more established competitors in a highly competitive market