BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
AusEire
Founding Member. It's ok to say No to Dot Joining
We'll likely have to contend with the fact that there will likely be no announcement unfortunately
I can't see anything on it being a contractual agreement? Hopefully I'm very wrong though? I'm not expecting an announcement and at least this way I won't be disappointed
My opinion only of course
Akida Ballista
JK200SX
Regular
Or we could end up with a trading halt before a formal announcement is released?We'll likely have to contend with the fact that there will likely be no announcement unfortunately
I'm not expecting an announcement and at least this way I won't be disappointed
My opinion only of course
Akida Ballista
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Hi AE... I'm with you on that notion...but it would be great to see something on the ASXWe'll likely have to contend with the fact that there will likely be no announcement unfortunately
I'm not expecting an announcement and at least this way I won't be disappointed
My opinion only of course
Akida Ballista
GO BRNLol very unlikely
AusEire
Founding Member. It's ok to say No to Dot Joining
Like said I hope I'm very wrong on my assessment
Fact Finder
Top 20
One has to ask rhetorically if this partnership is not considered material to the development of Brainchip then when the ASX does finally assess an announcement as price sensitive then we will all have to buy new socks.
True it is not a sale but it is a partnership with a significant player in the global semiconductor industry with world wide reach and yes I am going to say it household name status.
The ASX is a very unusual beast with strange ways and perhaps vested interests that are not aligned with those of retail investors.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
Like to hope they Ann the partnership.
If they don't then just adds merit to some of the previous things that have been said (fairly or unfairly). Market generally likes disclosure.
If they don't then just adds merit to some of the previous things that have been said (fairly or unfairly). Market generally likes disclosure.
Violin1
Regular
I think the company has been pretty clear about its approach to announcements so I wouldn't expect one today. The company makes announcements that have a material impact on revenue but not collaborations or potential revenue. I think the requirement to name Ford resulted in a more conservative approach than may have otherwise been the case. I'm happy with it - it protects our NDA customers which is very, very important. As Sean said - look to the financials. Not too long to go until the second half of 2022.We'll likely have to contend with the fact that there will likely be no announcement unfortunately
I'm not expecting an announcement and at least this way I won't be disappointed
My opinion only of course
Akida Ballista
Akida Ballista
Justchilln
Regular
In my opinion this partnership is as big as the megachips license, even thou there is no up front license fees I think it will result it bigger revenue in the future….
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Totally agree .... this is BIG news
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
The continuous disclosure rule is pretty simple barring obvious things like NDAs, others allowed for etc.
The key wording imo is underlined. Ask yourself as a SH, do we expect the partnership to have a material effect? That's a simple question for mine.
The ASX Listing Rule 3.1 Immediate notice of material information provides: “Once an entity is or becomes aware of any information concerning it that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the entity's securities, the entity must immediately tell ASX that information
The key wording imo is underlined. Ask yourself as a SH, do we expect the partnership to have a material effect? That's a simple question for mine.
The ASX Listing Rule 3.1 Immediate notice of material information provides: “Once an entity is or becomes aware of any information concerning it that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the entity's securities, the entity must immediately tell ASX that information
Last edited:
A sense of relief and excitement to see your posting here. HC is getting way too toxic to read nowadays. I just joined this forum today.
BRN is the most underrated future blue chip stock of asx imo
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Welcome aboard ypbisx ... time to detox! enjoy
SiFive got involved with DARPA last year....................................
www.theregister.com
It makes sense for Toolbox suppliers to cut DARPA program researchers special deals because they stand to make bank if these prototype chips turn into real commercial products that are purchased in volume by the military and others.
Engineers can get access to SiFive’s Core Designer and Custom Instruction Extension software, as well as tools for tracing, debugging, and security features like a hardware cryptographic accelerator, we’re told.
“We expect a broad range of applications for our IP. The DARPA Toolbox Initiative aims to help researchers behind DARPA programs get access to tools and IP easily. SiFive’s portfolio is broad, ranging from application-capable cores suitable for multi-core clusters to area and power-optimized embedded cores,” Prior added.
“RISC-V is of interest to DARPA researchers due to its academic heritage and open-standard nature. By making SiFive Core IP and tools available to DARPA researchers as part of the Toolbox initiative, SiFive is making the adoption and use of RISC-V simpler and easier, removing licensing and design hurdles from R&D teams paths.”
DARPA adds RISC-V to its Toolbox: Defense researchers can get special access to SiFive chip designs
Labs offered tech by Arm as well as its upstart rival and others
It makes sense for Toolbox suppliers to cut DARPA program researchers special deals because they stand to make bank if these prototype chips turn into real commercial products that are purchased in volume by the military and others.
Engineers can get access to SiFive’s Core Designer and Custom Instruction Extension software, as well as tools for tracing, debugging, and security features like a hardware cryptographic accelerator, we’re told.
“We expect a broad range of applications for our IP. The DARPA Toolbox Initiative aims to help researchers behind DARPA programs get access to tools and IP easily. SiFive’s portfolio is broad, ranging from application-capable cores suitable for multi-core clusters to area and power-optimized embedded cores,” Prior added.
“RISC-V is of interest to DARPA researchers due to its academic heritage and open-standard nature. By making SiFive Core IP and tools available to DARPA researchers as part of the Toolbox initiative, SiFive is making the adoption and use of RISC-V simpler and easier, removing licensing and design hurdles from R&D teams paths.”
Shadow59
Regular
SiFive have already released the collaboration to the public space so no NDA here.
"Once an entity is or becomes aware of any information concerning it that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the entity's securities,"
I think most on here would consider themselves "reasonable persons" and see this as very significant.
I say "Go for it BRN"
Similar threads
