The Pope
Regular
Hi FFWhat I find most interesting is how transparent you and the other manipulators are but I should not be surprised given the proven depths of human depravity.
Personal attacks, threats of spills, pompous claims of self importance and financial sophistication.
Uninformed claims that a spill will remove a CEO.
The ignorance and misinformation rains down like a river.
Go and read the Rules a spill has no implications for the Chairman or the CEO particularly when the spill is led by disgruntled retail shareholders who manage to cobble together 25% on two occasions. The existing Board simply nominates again and are elected because they don’t even have to get 50% of the possible vote at the spill meeting.
The only one’s who win from a spill are the shorts, the manipulators and the trolls.
Retail shareholders will always loose.
Sharing publicly available information has not and will not ever be a cause for concern however ignorance and sinister intent will always be a trigger to be careful as the purveyor is someone not to be trusted.
Those who might be influenced by these flawed individuals should ask why has not one of these individuals challenged or unpicked the information that is contained in my earlier post?
Why have they not identified the untruths?
Why have they not identified and laid bare the price sensitive insider information that they seek to rage against?
Can they not find it?
Why have they not considered that the CEO and Board of a publicly listed company randomly sampling the views of a group of shareholders to understand their concerns beyond the simplicity of the day to day share price might be a good thing?
It was clear that the shareholders who attended in Sydney cut across age, social circumstance and were not selected based on the size of their wallet or shareholding.
Or dare I say what institution they worked at or what broker they break bread with on the weekend.
They gave all the outward appearance of a random selection and not an elite group of so called sophisticated or institutional investors.
Does this failure to only speak with the so called elites offend their collective sense of entitlement?
Do they fear their position as controllers of wealth and hence power may be undermined?
Real people with real concerns such as wives, husbands, children, retirement plans, fixed incomes, mortgages, relatives and friends who had invested on their advice in other words real people who only had one thing in common they have invested their hard earned in Brainchip and had concerns like the genuine shareholders who post here.
While the attacks have been directed at me these warriors of all that is disgusting about the ASX and social media are at the same time denigrating all the other real shareholders who took up this first in their lifetime opportunity to have a voice and be heard by those in charge of the company they have invested in.
Who among this group here would if offered the same opportunity to be heard not accept with a virtuous heart?
It is clear what the individuals who have played the man instead of the ball are about and it is not ensuring that an investment in Brainchip pays off for all shareholders.
My opinion only DYOR though Blind Freddie says their intent is obvious.
Regards
Fact Finder
It’s much appreciated that you have shared information discussed from your recall on this apparently informal meeting that you and a select few retail investors were invited to attend with Sean and Co in Sydney on 6/11/23
The only things I would like to put on record in this forum on this apparent informal meeting is I would have loved to have had the opportunity to attend this meeting to meet and ask questions to Sean and listen carefully to how Sean etc responded. Im sure not the only one.
I also trust that the select few who attended have disclosed all key information discussed at the informal meeting (no advantage over other retail investors) and has been been shared to all on this forum (not limited to) and it isn't just selective recall only from attendees. I suggest this may work towards calming the tension with others from recent posts. Im sure you understand where I am coming from amd don’t take it to heart.
Also my recall from previous posts yesterday on this informal meeting is it did last 2hrs approx so I consider that is a solid timeframe to discuss and raise questions with Sean and co.
I would also suggest this timeframe was considerably longer than share holders had at the recent AGM in Sydney as a large group of retail shareholders. My recall is the BRN board members ran out of time and took a number of questions on notice and would get back to them. I’m unsure if that ever happened but happy to be corrected by Tony Dawe as he apparently reads posts in this forum.
Hope all have a good weekend whenever it starts. Mine started this morning. lol
Cheers
The Pope