I think the latter- He doesn’t have to..
He already gets compensated very well in share based payments.. And if the company translates its ground work into success there will be further rewards in options and performance rights.. So both outcomes lead to not requiring self-purchasing of shares on market.
He will just pay a few $$ to convert options into shares..
Exactly!
Not to mention the idea of a balanced portfolio.
If he self manages, or has an advisor, he may have strict rules regarding how his portfolio is divided.
This could be by sector or by individual stocks.
IMO, the more BRN shares he is given for 'free', the more non-BRN shares he may have to buy to keep a balance, if that's his goal.
And lets not even bother talking about the tax implication of 'free' shares.
No wonder they just sell the 1/4 or so to cover the tax and keep their head focused on generating engagements.
Unfortunately whether people like/dislike the number of shares given to management, it creates nearly 0 reason to buy on market.
Personally I'm comfortable with that, I know others aren't but apparently that's what's required to attract and retain talent, which we know we have.