wilzy123
Founding Member
What's with all the hopeless negativity, honestly?
It's a choice. Anyone can spend every day complaining about something because they are allowed to. But if they do... now THAT is truly a hopeless waste of life.
What's with all the hopeless negativity, honestly?
This......There is a post on 'the other site' saying that Brainchip has not received any takeover bid from bigger competitors despite having a world leading technology and multiple IPs.
I want to know what would be a counter argument for this?
Thanks
It's a snapshot of a Motley fool article. The question has been addressed here too way back in the thread. Just a matter of finding it unless someone wants to engage.There is a post on 'the other site' saying that Brainchip has not received any takeover bid from bigger competitors despite having a world leading technology and multiple IPs.
I want to know what would be a counter argument for this?
Thanks
I hadn't seen this.There's only so many times one person can get called out by such a vast array of hugely beneficial, contributing members of the forum.
As many would know - i've spoken at length at how unnecessary and immature the snide remarks are from the member you mention. For a period there, upon mentioning, they would stop for a few weeks / few months. But in time, those weeks and months have turned into mere days, hours or don't even register now.
A leopard never changes its spots - and i think it's clear to see, there's no getting through to him. It creates so much unwarranted negativity in what is generally an exceptional forum, with balanced but fair discussion and respect offered shared among members. And yet, he still pokes, prods, antagonises people here to the point where they no longer want to voice that opinion, offer some research, show recognition or even visit the forum full stop. I know that as i've previously had to remove myself for months at a time.
Even in exchanging direct messages, the childishness continues. The true character being displayed growing even uglier.
It's now at a point where every other page in this thread, there's a nasty exchange which then draws more attention to feed his sick ego. And that's the worst part of it all - it detracts from other valuable information being shared and members donating generous time and effort in their contributions.
Zeebot - please make it stop.
Until then, could someone more tech savvy than i assist me in blocking him? I feel loathed to even mention his name.
That's all great and it's purely you're opinion and to be perfectly honest I'm just going to cut to the chase and agree to disagree.That's my issue with the forum and the reason all of my friends left months ago already.
As soon as someone does not agree, logical thinking just stops, and you get called a lier, downramper, stupid, thrown gifs at you ladididi dadidi.
A product, the only one you have, 3 years into commercialization that doesn't sell and even gets called not robust enough by its own company is a failure. End and over.
I can name you an example for a lie regarding this topic.
When the technology was ready for licensing, they said that revenue growth would outgrow expenses. They said that there will be a lot of ip licensing going forward, or other phrases liked it'd become the defacto standard.
Regarding the second gen, there was only an outdated timeline available.
I don't recall when it was, but I think it was some months maybe even only some weeks before the last AGM someone dropped that the "AKD1000 never intended to be a revenue stream"
Now that's a lie with consequences that we can all witness right now.
Can't wait for people making excuses like "he was only talking about physical chips and not IP" or whatever people will come up with.
Yes, the lady said just foundry and not Intel foundry services so just stating as it was mentioned. Yes same thing really in reference to intel in this manner during their discussionThere's some IFS and BUTs here. Lets start with Intel Foundry Services ...
View attachment 45000
Neuromorphic Computing Market Future Opportunities and Barriers by 2030
The recently published Neuromorphic Computing Market Report 2023 spanning across106pagesand offers a comprehensive overview of its present condition, size, volume and market share. In today's world, understanding thewww.benzinga.com
So far it's been 1001 days since our first license agreement. I wouldn't call that timeframe a record time for implementation.That's all great and it's purely you're opinion and to be perfectly honest I'm just going to cut to the chase and agree to disagree.
Anyway the main part of my response to you was ignored unfortunately. So here it is again.
If you're not happy with management what is your solution? How do you make the sales process faster and how do you make the giants of the tech industry buy our IP and then implement our tech in record time?
Are you a trader? If you are a trader, you don't have to think about forced closing of shorts because your broker arranges all that. Popular short sold shares must be very liquid so the call back by the original owner will not create an issue. I have never had a call from my broker saying I have to close my shorts because the owner wanted to sell. As the original owners want the shares back to sell anyway, so the buy and sell orders can be crossed or net off by the brokers and may not result in a normal transaction but those with special transaction codes. At any point in time, the brokers would have access to large quantities of shares waiting to be lent out to give to the seller so there is no need to buy the shares from the market.With the pressure of share prices, we shareholders all feel the pain.
Will be intresting to find out tomorrow, how much of short positions has been closed due to the ASX 200 Funds selling.
One would think, large volume of short positions would be close on last Friday. However, 15+Million shares was short on Friday, and wih the relentless selling the last 3 day. I will be interested in what volume short positions was able to closed on Friday.
1: 15+ Million shares was short on Friday to keep the price down, as the short know the Funds will try and keep the prices up for the closing auction?
2: Some short intresting was closed and re taken to short the last 3 day, as they know more funds are selling?
3: Short was not able to closed an substantial amount as someone else brought the shares the Funds sold. Hence, the short attack the last 3 day, as to close out more short positions?
The number of short positions will paint a picture of what going, me think
Just me trying to understand the current situation.
Learning![]()
Thanks for the some new knowledge Cyw,Are you a trader? If you are a trader, you don't have to think about forced closing of shorts because your broker arranges all that. Popular short sold shares must be very liquid so the call back by the original owner will not create an issue. I have never had a call from my broker saying I have to close my shorts because the owner wanted to sell. As the original owners want the shares back to sell anyway, so the buy and sell orders can be crossed or net off by the brokers and may not result in a normal transaction but those with special transaction codes. At any point in time, the brokers would have access to large quantities of shares waiting to be lent out to give to the seller so there is no need to buy the shares from the market.
So far it's been 1001 days since our first license agreement. I wouldn't call that timeframe a record time for implementation.
There's no solution to make up for the past. Clearly, the technology was not robust enough for commercial success and misleading statements lead to an inflated share price.
I hope that the second gen will be. We have no insight in sales processes. However, according to the statements online, other companies were involved in the development process. That's what's necessary and the correct way of doing things. This can actually boost the sales processes when done correctly.
So even though I'm extremely disappointed with this terrible performance up until this time, I still have some faith left for the future.
The best technology doesn't always prevail, but hopefully this one does.
Remuneration
Sean Hehir currently receives USD450,000 per annum for his position as Chief Executive Officer. The amount stated is per annum comprising salary plus superannuation contributions, short term incentive payments (cash) and medical benefits. Mr Hehir is eligible to receive a Short-Term Incentive (“STI”) of up to 100% of the aforementioned salary annually. The Restricted Stock Units proposed to be issued to Mr Hehir under Resolution 7(a), if passed, are in addition to this sum and have an estimated fair value of A$985,054 (being A$328,351 per annum).
Can someone please explain this package?
SP is now at 22 cents.