Good to see you back PopeThanks for providing some solid drivel as well.
Wish you all the best for the future and I hope that is your last post as you don’t have any more BRN shares.

Good to see you back PopeThanks for providing some solid drivel as well.
Wish you all the best for the future and I hope that is your last post as you don’t have any more BRN shares.
WAT?HG can you imagine your and anyone's dot joining have much less meaning as compared to what the company is telling us.
Brainchip had reached at 5th position in short selling. Three months ago at investor update Sean told us SP will do what it has to do and this time Antonio told us akida 1.0 was not robust enough to support the sp. And partners are waiting for akida 2.0 now
So what you want to get from those investor updates. Is that the company is trying to tell holders that shorters had out smart us?? Or company is thinking actually shorters are right and we holders are idiot.
There was a time when I always get happy when shorter increase their bet, because that will mean holders can benefit but the last two investor updates had ruined my confidence in management. Just today 27 million shares are traded and we holders does not know other than dot joinings.
At the AGM Sean cannot speak well with share holders but the same Sean was confident while interviewing with someone on social media.
To me last two investor updates only benefitted the shorters.
Why the company could not tell us 2 years ago that we are getting headwinds with software. That would had be detrimental at that time but would had been wise advise to holders. Now when the shorters are all over us they are telling us that akida 1.0 was launched without any after market support. Donot you think LDN was removed because of that reason but company never try to tell to the holders what is going wrong.
Rob was saying to us tip of iceberg while they were not having right partners to support the iceberg.
I have only simple point if they keep quite that long and product is really good then why to come out and talk about weaknesses at a crucial point and demotivate the holders.
I believe SP would had been better without those investor updates. That is a reason I assume the investor updates are either to support the shorts or the worse has to come yet.
HG can you imagine your and anyone's dot joining have much less meaning as compared to what the company is telling us.
Brainchip had reached at 5th position in short selling. Three months ago at investor update Sean told us SP will do what it has to do and this time Antonio told us akida 1.0 was not robust enough to support the sp. And partners are waiting for akida 2.0 now
So what you want to get from those investor updates. Is that the company is trying to tell holders that shorters had out smart us?? Or company is thinking actually shorters are right and we holders are idiot.
There was a time when I always get happy when shorter increase their bet, because that will mean holders can benefit but the last two investor updates had ruined my confidence in management. Just today 27 million shares are traded and we holders does not know other than dot joinings.
At the AGM Sean cannot speak well with share holders but the same Sean was confident while interviewing with someone on social media.
To me last two investor updates only benefitted the shorters.
Why the company could not tell us 2 years ago that we are getting headwinds with software. That would had be detrimental at that time but would had been wise advise to holders. Now when the shorters are all over us they are telling us that akida 1.0 was launched without any after market support. Donot you think LDN was removed because of that reason but company never try to tell to the holders what is going wrong.
Rob was saying to us tip of iceberg while they were not having right partners to support the iceberg.
I have only simple point if they keep quite that long and product is really good then why to come out and talk about weaknesses at a crucial point and demotivate the holders.
I believe SP would had been better without those investor updates. That is a reason I assume the investor updates are either to support the shorts or the worse has to come yet.
8.40 ish
Uploaded 2 days ago.
UNCUT: Elon Musk’s MIND BLOWING Live Tesla FSD Demo
Stick to whinging. Being interested in the company doesn't suit you buddy.This is actually a very intriguing possibility - @Diogenese come on, don’t leave us hanging!..
8.40 ish
Uploaded 2 days ago.
UNCUT: Elon Musk’s MIND BLOWING Live Tesla FSD Demo
Shhhh peanut, not financial adviceWhat a great post .. omg. So great.
It's always a GREAT sign when all these dormant accounts like you come out of the woodworkShhhh peanut, not financial advice
Stick to whinging. Being interested in the company doesn't suit you buddy.
You’re correct. What baffles my mind is that all the posters with their “burn the shorters” attitude started rallying against them when we were at >1$ claiming that they loose money.HG can you imagine your and anyone's dot joining have much less meaning as compared to what the company is telling us.
Brainchip had reached at 5th position in short selling. Three months ago at investor update Sean told us SP will do what it has to do and this time Antonio told us akida 1.0 was not robust enough to support the sp. And partners are waiting for akida 2.0 now
So what you want to get from those investor updates. Is that the company is trying to tell holders that shorters had out smart us?? Or company is thinking actually shorters are right and we holders are idiot.
There was a time when I always get happy when shorter increase their bet, because that will mean holders can benefit but the last two investor updates had ruined my confidence in management. Just today 27 million shares are traded and we holders does not know other than dot joinings.
At the AGM Sean cannot speak well with share holders but the same Sean was confident while interviewing with someone on social media.
To me last two investor updates only benefitted the shorters.
Why the company could not tell us 2 years ago that we are getting headwinds with software. That would had be detrimental at that time but would had been wise advise to holders. Now when the shorters are all over us they are telling us that akida 1.0 was launched without any after market support. Donot you think LDN was removed because of that reason but company never try to tell to the holders what is going wrong.
Rob was saying to us tip of iceberg while they were not having right partners to support the iceberg.
I have only simple point if they keep quite that long and product is really good then why to come out and talk about weaknesses at a crucial point and demotivate the holders.
I believe SP would had been better without those investor updates. That is a reason I assume the investor updates are either to support the shorts or the worse has to come yet.
I’ll tell you what Wilzy, why don’t you just ignore me, and I’ll ignore you. It’s not like I’d be missing much, I genuinely cannot think of a single post you’ve made in all these years that add a particle of value anyway.
"Now we have to hope that a cap raise won’t be coming and that the management team chooses action over words. Something up until this point they were never able to do."You’re correct. What baffles my mind is that all the posters with their “burn the shorters” attitude started rallying against them when we were at >1$ claiming that they loose money.
We have to face that the first generation failed massively. We have to face that none of the dot joining in the past 3-4 years ever eventuated to something material. We know that valeo won’t use the current Akida technology.
I’m sure our technology is top notch especially the following generations.
However, it doesn’t matter as long as the management board fails to deliver. If companies choose other technologies over ours no matter if ours is superior, then management ist not able to handle our company.
Now we have to hope that a cap raise won’t be coming and that the management team chooses action over words. Something up until this point they were never able to do.
Sorry cosors,
I'm not sure how to interpret that. What do I care about the umbrellas of my friends and I think:
View attachment 43207
I am here for many years to look back later with Schadenfreude.)
I will never have to say to myself again - if I had once (Amazon, MS, Google). The game at the table goes into the next round. I am very patient. So patient, in fact, that the vacation season in Sweden which pushes the MC down by dozens of millions doesn't make me itch.
Looking forward to the MB with
Akida, Talnode Si and ReRAM on board, sometime. I still don't find that improbable. Rather the opposite.
A mate and Tesla fan (holder) just told me: ~has nothing to do with BRN. Runs on 'old' FSD version 3 hardware from Tesla and is installed in a few million cars.Surely something this smart with only now needing 3000 lines of code running on an “neural net” and can be fully localised has to have been “bought” and integrated in to a Tesla.
Sure sounds like Akida!
Na, all fine. You know English is my Archilles' verse. I'm here to learn. At first I thought something like: Schadenfreude of the friends and that as a defensive shield ~ umbrella because of the frustration they might suspect in me because not only BRN looks badly beaten up, but also TLG and on top of it WBT.Sorry cosors,
A couple of feeble translingual puns:
s(c)hade = umbra -> umbrella
freu( n )d(e) = friend