BRN Discussion Ongoing

[rgupta]

View attachment 43158

Just like akida 1000 1st batch is available, gone into testing, performance results better than expected, chips are allocated, after two years it was not robust, software was not available.
No one wants to believe akida 1000 was a flop and we could not even recover the costs leave alone profits.

 

[Schnitzel lover]

Good idea. About time they felt the pain of their own commercial faliures............my opinion only.

Na I was just being passive aggressive. Positivity is what we need..

Just need a few days to clear out the BRN pain..

Come on BRN! Lets go!

 

[Townyj]

Just like akida 1000 1st batch is available, gone into testing, performance results better than expected, chips are allocated, after two years it was not robust, software was not available.
No one wants to believe akida 1000 was a flop and we could not even recover the costs leave alone profits.

Wot? We mainly sell IP.. so not sure what your on about. Seems like Renesas, Megachips, NASA, Edge Impulse and alot of others are fine using it. So errrr.

Its robust enough for ANT61 to wanna send into space as well.

 

[Mccabe84]

Just like akida 1000 1st batch is available, gone into testing, performance results better than expected, chips are allocated, after two years it was not robust, software was not available.
No one wants to believe akida 1000 was a flop and we could not even recover the costs leave alone profits.

Depends how you look at it. To me a flop means nothing comes from it ( end of that tech ). We have 2 IP deals with that came from it, plus we also had companies that tested it and gave BRN recommendations that they would like hence the 1500 and others to come. So is it really a flop like you said . I don’t think it is.

 

[rgupta]

Wot? We mainly sell IP.. so not sure what your on about. Seems like Edge Impulse and alot of others are fine using it. So errrr.

Harsh reality is that we could not sell enough chips or ips with akida 1000
But yes we got a line in our profile 1st neurophonic chip producer. We come in front of Intel and IBM as they cannot launch their product. The strategy only helped the day traders and shorters while the long term holders are crying.

 

[Vladsblood]

Demonstrates, enables, availability...........all nice words but have a look at what the market thinks of them. The reality is that BRN is a publicly listed ASX company and the board and CEO have a moral and fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of their stakeholders - i.e. us. To sit on the sidelines saying nothing of real substance except things like "the share price will do what the share price will do" and "it is what it is" whilst so many shareholders' investments are decimated is, in my opinion, a disgrace. A good start on restoring some credibility in the market would be for the board and CEO to take a pay cut and suspend any further management bonuses until there is some demonstrable commercial success. As it stands, they are fiddling while Rome burns.........all in my opinion.

Saw the worst with Spl and their ceo now retiring as sold sp has sunk. She retires with millions and shareholders get a gutted sp as their return for years of loyalty. I got out some time back…years ago lucky too. Vlad

 

[rgupta]

Depends how you look at it. To me a flop means nothing comes from it ( end of that tech ). We have 2 IP deals with that came from it, plus we also had companies that tested it and gave BRN recommendations that they would like hence the 1500 and others to come. So is it really a flop like you said . I don’t think it is.

Flop to me when you cannot recover the cost of product from the sale of product. There was no strategy, no orders etc.
That leads into LDN termination. Now if the present management delivers the same way that will be a termination of a lot of faith and wealth invested by long term holders.

 

[Stockbob]

Flop to me when you cannot recover the cost of product from the sale of product. There was no strategy, no orders etc.
That leads into LDN termination. Now if the present management delivers the same way that will be a termination of a lot of faith and wealth invested by long term holders.

Akida 1000 was to prove the concept in silicon, this has been said so many times over. So what are you saying comp shouldn't have released akida 1000 ? and how do you expect to take the feedback and improve ? and how can you say costs are not recovered, renesas is going to be releasing thier chip based on akida 1000 soon and megachips also have bought a license for the same , how can you say no orders

 

[Mccabe84]

Flop to me when you cannot recover the cost of product from the sale of product. There was no strategy, no orders etc.
That leads into LDN termination. Now if the present management delivers the same way that will be a termination of a lot of faith and wealth invested by long term holders.

- Amazon 9 years till made a profit
- Tesla 17 years
Just to mention a couple. Are these companies flops too. BRNs first generation (A1000) is around 2 years old.. new tech takes time

 

[Mccabe84]

Partners

Become a partner!

brainchip.com

How long has GMAC Intelligence been on BRNs partner page ? Anyway enough post from me for the day..

 

[Damo4]

Partners

Become a partner!

brainchip.com

How long has GMAC Intelligence been on BRNs partner page ? Anyway enough post from me for the day..

https://brainchip.com/gmac-intelligence-goes-big-with-brainchip-partnership/

GMAC Intelligence Goes Big with BrainChip Partnership​

Laguna Hills, Calif. – July 16, 2023

 

[Vladsblood]

Volume going up SP going down fast …well management did say they will let SP take care of itself…good job. Info us on Nasdaq stance at the very least PLEASE
SOS to FF please mate give us your view on current position. Vlad

 

[rgupta]

I agree 100% tech takes time to establish but here the question is how you plan and implement things.
On the time frames brn is more than 12 years old as well and still no profits.

The other point I want to raise here is every good product cannot be a success just because it is a good product. We you give a good product to bad manager they can kill the product. That is why I never consider a product is a success until it is a success.
My understanding is one more failure can be detrimental. I had invested in brn with high risk reward ratio and will wait longer than anyone else. But got frustrated when management keep on changing wordings.

 

[Bravo]

One can only wonder if these technological highlights and amazing announcements will include the additional information that Markus was going to deliver on his second LinkedIn blog about neuromorphic computing.

Also, it'd be great to hear a bit more about the "systems" (plural) that Mercedes have said they've been working on with our technology.

 

[rgupta]

Wot? We mainly sell IP.. so not sure what your on about. Seems like Renesas, Megachips, NASA, Edge Impulse and alot of others are fine using it. So errrr.

Its robust enough for ANT61 to wanna send into space as well.

If that is the case then why cannot we sell enough chips to recover our cost ?

 

[Rskiff]

If that is the case then why cannot we sell enough chips to recover our cost ?

maybe because BRN is a IP company now, not in the chip producing model

 

[IloveLamp]

Cheif scientist at BRN likes it and not for the first time....

Something tells me perhaps the new "analog" ai chip from ibm may not be that analog......

 

[DingoBorat]

Cheif scientist at BRN likes it and not for the first time....

Something tells me perhaps the new "analog" ai chip from ibm may not be that analog......

View attachment 43171

I have layman's doubt that an analog or combination analog/digital chip, will ever be able to be developed to the extent, of a purely digital design, which we have by the balls..

 

[Mccabe84]

I agree 100% tech takes time to establish but here the question is how you plan and implement things.
On the time frames brn is more than 12 years old as well and still no profits.

The other point I want to raise here is every good product cannot be a success just because it is a good product. We you give a good product to bad manager they can kill the product. That is why I never consider a product is a success until it is a success.
My understanding is one more failure can be detrimental. I had invested in brn with high risk reward ratio and will wait longer than anyone else. But got frustrated when management keep on changing wordings.

BRN is more than 12 years old, but How old is neuromorphic technology and the first working product?

Anyway we all see things in different ways and only time will tell who’s right and who’s wrong

 

[rgupta]

maybe because BRN is a IP company now, not in the chip producing model

So why we need akida 1500?