Xhosa12345
Regular
Queue wilzy dumpster fire please....Seriously no one liked my greg norman shorts chubby joke??!!
Back to the drawing board i guess !
Queue wilzy dumpster fire please....Seriously no one liked my greg norman shorts chubby joke??!!
Back to the drawing board i guess !
They being Brainchip, or they being ISRO in their rover?Who said they had a chip?
Whether or not Akida is used in their project, it does not take an IP agreement to control one or more systems in a single vehicle.Yep. Dots are great, but can be misleading. Nothing really counts until the company actually announces it.
From skimming the article on India's Moon landing, there is nothing I could see, that suggests A.I. hardware.What's got me concerned that if it's not Akida, wouldn't that mean that it's not the only commercially available chip/IP out there?
Thumbs up, for the Flux CapacitorBRN has finally hit a fork in the road.
I believe all shareholders are expecting 1 plus IP deals within 6 months of the release of 2.0.
Akida 2.0 was designed based on customers requirements.
The time has come for BRN to convert lookers into buyers and become a real AI player.
My view is 6 months is enough time from release to make my decision to continue with current management or not.
Current customers would have made their decisions on BRN already and are just waiting for the official 2.0 release.
I personally believe the sales team have every right to ask for the business now, particularly because the 2.0 was designed based on the their requirements.
If the customers are not prepared to sign then I think either management needs to change or BRN to be sold off.
You must have signed IP deals in the order bank to progress forward.
Time will tell.
View attachment 43022
BRN has finally hit a fork in the road.
I believe all shareholders are expecting 1 plus IP deals within 6 months of the release of 2.0.
Akida 2.0 was designed based on customers requirements.
The time has come for BRN to convert lookers into buyers and become a real AI player.
My view is 6 months is enough time from release to make my decision to continue with current management or not.
Current customers would have made their decisions on BRN already and are just waiting for the official 2.0 release.
I personally believe the sales team have every right to ask for the business now, particularly because the 2.0 was designed based on the their requirements.
If the customers are not prepared to sign then I think either management needs to change or BRN to be sold off.
You must have signed IP deals in the order bank to progress forward.
Time will tell.
View attachment 43022
It actually will change a lot.A lot of posters point out that the release of the second gen will/ could change the price dump that we’ve experienced in Germany already.
But what will it change?
Now we have confirmation that the first gen is a flop. 3 years into commercialisation with nothing to show for.
Now it’s gonna take months if not years once again. Who cares if a second gen of a product that didn’t sell will be released?
No one
I am only a newbie ti LinkedIn so not quite sure how to forward things on?
It's in a different language but I'm sure it says neural network? S130
Perhaps someone else can supply a clearer print than my cut and paste.
View attachment 43021
Not sure if it was just me, it kinda sounded like he was saying - it is what it is and result of the vote is simply because of the lower share price as they've already changed the rem report last year and they will just continue as they feel confident that they are on the right path......The last investor updates had proven shorters and fools right about the company and we holders wrong. I don't know what is behind the scenes but the words were almost exact. Our 1.0 was not robust enough to support the sp. Which in other means stands no where.
I am a believer of technology and believes company will learn from their failures and come out of dark. We have better ecosystem, better products , better market insights than what we had 3 years ago. So hopefully things will change for better.
I also believe that 1st strike was an eye opener for the management and if they cannot improve in time that means we are in serious trouble now.
Dyor
I'd think they would remove the banner from the website if that was the case and surely a company as big a valeo would request the banner to be removed politely first....But the question is: Would BrainChip or any other company officially announce that the joint development was terminated? I would say NO. It would just not talk about it anymore, which they didn't do for for a longer time.
So we cannot be sure if it still exists.
....love that observation! Thanks for posting.Am I reading this correctly that ROBT ( ETF) has been buying up big in BRN ? Over 8mil shares and an increase of 94%
BRN Institutional Ownership and Shareholders - BrainChip Holdings Ltd (ASX) Stock
BRN Institutional Ownership and Shareholders - BrainChip Holdings Ltd (ASX) Stockfintel.io
The Big institution seem to be buying for some reason
View attachment 42915 View attachment 42916 View attachment 42917
I am still trying to average down in small lots when I can, but the foreign stock fee on Fidelity is brutal every time I purchase shares.Good evening, I know the last HY report has stirred up a lot of concerns amongst us, so I just want to be prepared to navigate this situation and contemplating whether I should average down again if the share price drops next week. If I use one of the known facts that Renesas already taping out a MCU with Akida in it in last Dec, my question is do you think SP should be higher then the current level once Renesas announce the availability of Akida powered MCU? I personally think it should, so hopefully that I got it right this time..
It actually will change a lot.
First of all, I personally don’t believe that AKD1000 was a flop. It did exactly what it was intended to do from a technical perspective, and was celebrated by those that verified it (Socionext, NASA, etc.). The impression given by the company is that the EAP customers wanted changes which were supposedly implemented into mk2. If this is the case, then there’s no reason (other than the time required for functional tests and verification) that these ‘customers’ wouldn’t sign a material contract.
I have no experience what the timeframes are here, but would guess that the EAP customers would have completed much of what it required over the past two+ years’ of engagement with Brainchip, and the timeframes attached to this phase could be much faster. This coupled with the fact that the economy (although a long road to recovery) has started to show slowing inflation, and the war in Ukraine is now showing a reduced effect on global markets, creating a more inviting environment for product releases. I would hope to see at least one new contract before the next AGM or we could be looking at a failure. Given the cocky statements made by management, even in the light of a train-wreck of a financial report, I suspect that they hope/suspect that this is how things will play out too. I remain optimistic for now.
Of course I could have it all very wrong.
I did some dot researching on "semantic segmentation and super-resolution", a formulation of the last patent anouncement... and this came up via google:I think as shareholders we are entitled to information that will help us to make informed decisions with regard to our investment. That's why I think we would (should) get confirmation of these things.
maybe these?Anyone know what the Indian version of SBIR is?