I wish.Like a Sony / Prophesee stacked camera sensor
I wish.Like a Sony / Prophesee stacked camera sensor
Isn't that chess, not scrabble?FF - great to have you back and after reading this comment I do believe the phrase many are scrabbling for is .... Check and Mate
We don't actually have the PCIe boards yet.It is indeed good to see FF back. And presenting well reasoned observations. The thing I have a problem with is this. If AKD1500 is competitively so important, why is the company not saying so publically. Stealth marketing?? FFS, someone at BRN start waving the flag!!!!
I suppose from an abundance of caution perspective you're right. However, if when the product is produced and tested to function we don't see some chest beating I for one will be VERY disappointed. Time to stop hiding our light under a bush.We don't actually have the PCIe boards yet.
Yes, but a little more complicated for the customer.I suppose from an abundance of caution perspective you're right. However, if when the product is produced and tested to function we don't see some chest beating I for one will be VERY disappointed. Time to stop hiding our light under a bush.
And just by the by, it seems to me that selling IP is a form of selling software...........no physical product involved, just code.
Well, sometimes. My speciality was in database and tools (4GL, data extraction, BI) rather than packages. So we were selling stuff for our customers to make other stuff with...Yes, but a little more complicated for the customer.
According to ChatGPT:The Facts:
Rob who is a dentist because he keeps his identity secret has listed his house for sale. Rob spent a great deal of time researching his local agents and chooses Browns because they have the highest number of sales and listings in the last 12 months and the principle has received industry awards and has hundreds of compliments on his web page from happy vendors and purchasers complementing him and his team for their honesty and service.
As a result Rob tells Browns that he is in a hurry to sell his house and for the best possible price but he is stressed financially and will need to sell regardless of price. Browns advise Rob that in this market sales are occurring but days on market has increased and so given his circumstances the best strategy is to go to auction with a short but intensive marketing campaign and a number of open houses both on the weekend and weekdays leading up to the auction. Rob was impressed and signs the sales and auction agreement.
Rob a week later is having a coffee at his local café and starts talking to a complete stranger about real estate and mentions he has his house going to auction in two weeks. The stranger replies “I hope you do not have that useless mob Browns doing the auction. They are the worst agents I have seen in 30 years of being involved in real estate investing.”
The stranger is called for his takeaway coffee and leaves the café. Rob has no idea who this person was or what his motivation is but starts to worry about his opinion even though it is completely anonymous and directly opposed to everything he has discovered and his personal opinion having spoken with Browns.
The following day is the first open for inspection. Worried Rob parks up the road to watch. It is a Thursday and Browns have told him that being Thursday there is unlikely to be many people inspecting but it is important to get the message out as passing motorists will see the signs and start to investigate the online sales.
Even though Rob has been told this he becomes worried when only a couple of cars arrive and only a few people enter the property and he then starts to think that the stranger may have been correct.
Rob starts to ask friends and relatives if they think he has chosen the wrong agent. None of these persons live in his area and they all have no knowledge of the agents or real estate but some still venture opinions because everyone is entitled to hold and give an opinion.
They are of limited emotional intelligence and do not consider the consequences of giving such ill-considered uninformed opinions and when one is asked by his wife why he said what he did to Rob he said why would he take any notice of me anyway.
Unfortunately Rob does to the extent that it fuels his anxiety and he starts to worry so much he is loosing sleep. He reads negative things in the press about the real estate market and about a dishonest agent in another city and ignores that the sales figures for his area continue to exceed the national average and his agents excellent reputation. He completely ignores all the evidence that Browns keep performing and telling the truth to their customers.
The next open for inspection is on Saturday and this time the agent arrives and tells Rob that he expects a significant number of people to turn up because of the telephone and email traffic they have had. When Rob is leaving he notices a number of cars parked in the street and people milling around at the gate. Rob leaves.
The agent sets up the house and then positions himself at the front door ready to declare the house open. What the agent did not see was a shadowy male figure at the side window of the house watching as he went about his duties and that immediately he went out the front door that this shadowy figure quickly enter via the back door and relieved himself on the loungeroom coffee table and defecate on the carpet in front of the fireplace before quickly exiting out the back door and leaving by the side gate.
This shadowy figure then waited until all of the interested purchasers had entered to inspect the property whereupon he places notices under the wipers of the parked vehicles maligning the honesty and competency of Browns and recommending another property that is open for inspection with another agent two streets away claiming it represents much better value for money.
The question for you to answer is who is most likely to be the shadowy figure:
1. Is it Rob the home owner with the most at stake?
2. Is it a rival real estate agent trying to break into the area and attempting to destroy Browns reputation?
3. Is it the anonymous stranger who for his own personal reasons wants to ruin Rob’s chances of a sale to pick up a bargain having discovered that Rob has to sell regardless of price?
4. Is it a 'good' Samaritan trying to help Rob by exercising a right to free vandalism and speech?
Perfect analogy my friend....... and welcome back (in whatever capacity you so chose matey)The Facts:
Rob who is a dentist because he keeps his identity secret has listed his house for sale. Rob spent a great deal of time researching his local agents and chooses Browns because they have the highest number of sales and listings in the last 12 months and the principle has received industry awards and has hundreds of compliments on his web page from happy vendors and purchasers complementing him and his team for their honesty and service.
As a result Rob tells Browns that he is in a hurry to sell his house and for the best possible price but he is stressed financially and will need to sell regardless of price. Browns advise Rob that in this market sales are occurring but days on market has increased and so given his circumstances the best strategy is to go to auction with a short but intensive marketing campaign and a number of open houses both on the weekend and weekdays leading up to the auction. Rob was impressed and signs the sales and auction agreement.
Rob a week later is having a coffee at his local café and starts talking to a complete stranger about real estate and mentions he has his house going to auction in two weeks. The stranger replies “I hope you do not have that useless mob Browns doing the auction. They are the worst agents I have seen in 30 years of being involved in real estate investing.”
The stranger is called for his takeaway coffee and leaves the café. Rob has no idea who this person was or what his motivation is but starts to worry about his opinion even though it is completely anonymous and directly opposed to everything he has discovered and his personal opinion having spoken with Browns.
The following day is the first open for inspection. Worried Rob parks up the road to watch. It is a Thursday and Browns have told him that being Thursday there is unlikely to be many people inspecting but it is important to get the message out as passing motorists will see the signs and start to investigate the online sales.
Even though Rob has been told this he becomes worried when only a couple of cars arrive and only a few people enter the property and he then starts to think that the stranger may have been correct.
Rob starts to ask friends and relatives if they think he has chosen the wrong agent. None of these persons live in his area and they all have no knowledge of the agents or real estate but some still venture opinions because everyone is entitled to hold and give an opinion.
They are of limited emotional intelligence and do not consider the consequences of giving such ill-considered uninformed opinions and when one is asked by his wife why he said what he did to Rob he said why would he take any notice of me anyway.
Unfortunately Rob does to the extent that it fuels his anxiety and he starts to worry so much he is loosing sleep. He reads negative things in the press about the real estate market and about a dishonest agent in another city and ignores that the sales figures for his area continue to exceed the national average and his agents excellent reputation. He completely ignores all the evidence that Browns keep performing and telling the truth to their customers.
The next open for inspection is on Saturday and this time the agent arrives and tells Rob that he expects a significant number of people to turn up because of the telephone and email traffic they have had. When Rob is leaving he notices a number of cars parked in the street and people milling around at the gate. Rob leaves.
The agent sets up the house and then positions himself at the front door ready to declare the house open. What the agent did not see was a shadowy male figure at the side window of the house watching as he went about his duties and that immediately he went out the front door that this shadowy figure quickly enter via the back door and relieved himself on the loungeroom coffee table and defecate on the carpet in front of the fireplace before quickly exiting out the back door and leaving by the side gate.
This shadowy figure then waited until all of the interested purchasers had entered to inspect the property whereupon he places notices under the wipers of the parked vehicles maligning the honesty and competency of Browns and recommending another property that is open for inspection with another agent two streets away claiming it represents much better value for money.
The question for you to answer is who is most likely to be the shadowy figure:
1. Is it Rob the home owner with the most at stake?
2. Is it a rival real estate agent trying to break into the area and attempting to destroy Browns reputation?
3. Is it the anonymous stranger who for his own personal reasons wants to ruin Rob’s chances of a sale to pick up a bargain having discovered that Rob has to sell regardless of price?
4. Is it a 'good' Samaritan trying to help Rob by exercising a right to free vandalism and speech?
VERY WELCOME BACK FF!! Very thoughtful post!!I find the complete absence of any information about LSTM & Transformers in this podcast extremely exciting.
Previously Peter van der Made said as Acting CEO AKD 2000 was ready to go to engineering shortly.
Ken Scarince explaining the payments recorded in the half yearly said they had bought and paid for all the necessary third party IP for AKD 2000.
Rob Telson was excited in the Carnegie Mellon podcast about transformers for natural language processing.
Anil Mankar said at 2021 Ai Field day there would be a little bit of LSTM in AKD1500.
As a matter of proven science and engineering there are multiple papers supporting that CNN, RNN & SNN are compatible with LSTM and Transformers.
NOW COMPLETE SILENCE. THIS SILENCE HAS TO BE SIGNIFICANT in my opinion.
As for whether this Podcast was just fluff I will remind everyone that various posters here have lauded the ability of Peter van der Made to set out a timetable for the completion of his vision and marvelled that since he did so back in 2015 he has met every technology development target yet those same posters have not given Peter van der Made's statement that AGI of the type he described will be achieved by Brainchip in 2030 approximately. If Bill Gates made the same statement imagine how the World's press would respond.
The third and compelling piece of information in this Podcast comes from the clear statement that by producing AKD1500 without a CPU in fully digital format in 22nm at Global Foundries Brainchip will be swiping the feet out from under all those claiming to be able to produce SNN in analogue as no one developing analogue SNN for the edge can offer such flexibility and scalability because of the yet to be overcome difficulties involved in producing analogue chips.
@Diogenese has expanded on this numerous times and multiple papers have been posted together with links on HC and TSEx. This revealed FACT is SIGNIFICANT and those suggesting it is a fluff podcast clearly have no idea about AKIDA technology revolution and should refrain from commenting until they do. SCIENCE is not about lay opinions.
While not spoken of in great detail at 22nm from Global Foundries the reduction of leakage involved in their design ordinarily produces up to a 70% improvement in power use of a traditional von Neumann designed chip.
This is a well known and understood FACT that anyone and everyone in the semiconductor space just knows so when all those on the Podcast glossed over this FACT and spoke to the huge power saving advantage of AKIDA technology they most likely thought that even your average retail investor in Brainchip would understand what a further up to 70% power saving is not fluff and will mean that when Brainchip presents the AKD1500 to the World it will create ripples throughout the semiconductor industry.
The already inconceivable science fiction of AKD1000 at 300 megahertz outperforming a GPU running at 900 megahertz just gets blown out into something that is beyond Edge Impulses understanding of what constitutes science fiction. Imagine the reaction that Nviso will have to what AKD1500 can do????
This is my opinion only so feel free to urinate all over these known provable FACTS for your own malicious purposes and continue to claim this was just a fluff Podcast.
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Perfect analogy my friend....... and welcome back (in whatever capacity you so chose matey)
If you don't have dreams, you can't have dreams come true!
The article said that this was the 14TH TIME a Tesla has driven or been driven into a stationary emergency vehicle. In the old days three times was a proof and no one ever got to doing the same stupid thing 14 times without someone calling a halt.I think the whole idea, of having an automated driving system, that needs the driver to still pay attention, is flawed, as it defeats the whole purpose of it being automated in the first place.
I can't imagine being in the "drivers" seat of an SDC and constantly monitoring everything, in case it f*%ks up..
I imagine, that it would be more stressful, than just having full control!
The whole "idea" is so that you can relax and take your mind off the road..
It will only be truly achieveable, with dedicated road infrastructure, in my humble opinion.
12 car companies caused autonomous driving accidents last year and we only hear about Tesla.I think the whole idea, of having an automated driving system, that needs the driver to still pay attention, is flawed, as it defeats the whole purpose of it being automated in the first place.
I can't imagine being in the "drivers" seat of an SDC and constantly monitoring everything, in case it f*%ks up..
I imagine, that it would be more stressful, than just having full control!
The whole "idea" is so that you can relax and take your mind off the road..
It will only be truly achieveable, with dedicated road infrastructure, in my humble opinion.
I'm sorry but l have decided to express my opinion about you and others and your claim that everyone has a right to their opinion think its a hissy fit.We all have and are entitled to our own opinions here on TSE, so please don't have a " hissy fit " and make false assertions about my post of the recent podcast being fluff made for malicious purposes .....