Firstly, I would like to state, that I agree with the issues that were raised recently by " Cardpro " post to answer some of the points you have raised in your post.Just for some clarity, can you please clarify exactly what material events have occurred that have not been disclosed to us (and would mean that continuous disclosure obligations have not been met).
Before you do though, I'd just like to note:
From where I stand, your 'cone of silence' comment is unfair. We know exactly who has licensed our IP. We know our tech is commercially available. We know our tech is silicon proven.
- If a company has licensed our IP then an announcement will be required
- We have already received announcements for the IP licensing deals with Renasas and Megachips
- What Renasas and Megachips do with our IP is their business, we won't receive announcements when their customers implement our technology
- Our licensing partners don't need to disclose any information to us about their customers
- Our licensing partners do need to inform us of sales volumes etc so that we can invoice for royalties appropriately
- We have already received an announcement for the commercialisation of the akida boards, raspberry pies etc
- We will not receive announcements every time a company orders a board to test our technology
- Companies don't have to license our technology to be able to use it - they can utilise our technology via Renasas and Megachips (which means we may never find out who some of the companies that use our technology are)
- The 4C contains engineering support fees which indicates that we have been assisting prospective customers and/or our licensing partners with the implementation of akida in products
- Until a product is commercialised and sold, we will not receive royalties
We also receive monthly podcasts which keep us updated on all things happening in the semiconductor and generally at brainchip.
I'd love to know which material events I'm missing.
IMO... I would also like to think/expect that there are most likely many other "Material Events" that have taken place, which have not been disclosed or advised of given the fact that the Co has historically conveniently coveredsuch matters by the usual Co deflection excuse of their being NDA involvement especially given the Co's lastest comment in the 4C specifically stating that "we are seeing the greatest amount of sales activity and engagement in the company's history"... and yet we know nothing about this uptake nor do we have any "substantive disclosure" from the Co concerning the basis of making such a comment.
Finally ...... In reply to your comment stating : " I'd love to know which material events I'm missing."
I would like to bring up the most significant fact which imo is that with all the excellent TSE / 1000 eyes dot joining investigations, work, articles, news releases, podcasts, facts , figures, management likes on social media etc etc etc etc ... imo... there are most likely many other material events taking place that we have not been made privy to ........ Are we then to think, that all that has been disclosed here by TSE and the 1000 eyes is all BS and of no substance ???