The new patent applications have been announced previously as part of 100 new international patents to protect Brainchip IP worldwide. We are a global company after all!The additional non executive directors imo is a great endorsement of bigger and better times ahead.
I note that what also surprised me at the AGM was that Peter mentioned another 50 Patents to lodge to protect our IP.
Yes. But that's not financial advice ... just my fifty years in the computing and IT business shooting my mouth off!So are we still looking at 10x Microsoft
Given the share price will do what the share price does???
MAJOR SHORTING ATTACK ON BRN as of Monday 23rd May 2022
3.5 Mil NEW Shorts on Monday
6.5 Mil NEW Shorts on Tuesday
View attachment 7660
Last weeks "moderate" Shorts added.
View attachment 7661
LAST FRIDAYS shorting positions ASX - same as on mon 23rd no change.
View attachment 7663
Will be interesting to see if TODAY more NEW Shorts are added to the list.
Possibly considering yesterdays attempt to remove PVDM all of this should be considered a "Hostile" Attack ??? What else could it be?
Any ideas peoples? Open to suggestions.
Yak52
So just the usual opportunistic predatory behaviour.A Look through the ORDER BOOK on the SELL side shows major stacking of FALSE SELL ORDERS.
2.3 Mil of large orders from $1.25 up
Multiples of 100,000 orders at most levels including 200k orders also from 1.25 up
Multiples of exact 10k,20k,30k,50k orders at each and every level from 1.25 up.
In all probably around 3-4 mil of False orders placed in the SELL side.
18 mil traded so far today . High yesterday of 1.33 now at 1.09
Yak52
MANIPULATION
IRON GRIP by the same organization as yesterdays manipulated dump using their buying/selling power via the BoTs to control the SP today.
They had knowledge of the ASX release just before (performance rights/shares to CEO & Board) before the Market and did that hard dump from $1.17 down to $1.13 and are now forcing the SP down more.
THEY .....have vacuumed up 12 Million shares so far today.
Yak52
Hope to see him on CNBC soon! Go tell the world…we’ll see you at the EDGE of the rainbow.Stay tuned…. View attachment 7662
Thanks FF, I am assuming "whom"...as that wouldn't be difficult! If it was one person that is..I suppose it is not unreasonable to say that some accord me credibility.
I cannot say what, how or why I know but all of the theory even my original thoughts at the AGM when I was told what the voting numbers against Peter were, we’re wide of the mark.
No one has come anywhere near what this vote was about but it was a one off.
Not nice but it has all been resolved.
The Board is 100% behind Peter van der Made full stop.
There is no takeover game in play relating to this vote.
If the votes were designed to kick BRN off its perch look to the votes caste on all the other motions.
The party or parties behind those votes could have voted to cause a spill of the entire Board as they were on a second strike.
They did not.
They could have caused concerns about the companies leader and new Board members they did not.
I cannot say anymore.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
This is not the little birdie I mentioned but one clever bird none the less.all the talk of birds I have to show you the bird which came into my garden today.
View attachment 7654
I think that you and I both have a good idea & know who it was that voted that way ........ a certain individual !!!!I suppose it is not unreasonable to say that some accord me credibility.
I cannot say what, how or why I know but all of the theory even my original thoughts at the AGM when I was told what the voting numbers against Peter were, we’re wide of the mark.
No one has come anywhere near what this vote was about but it was a one off.
Not nice but it has all been resolved.
The Board is 100% behind Peter van der Made full stop.
There is no takeover game in play relating to this vote.
If the votes were designed to kick BRN off its perch look to the votes caste on all the other motions.
The party or parties behind those votes could have voted to cause a spill of the entire Board as they were on a second strike.
They did not.
They could have caused concerns about the companies leader and new Board members they did not.
I cannot say anymore.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Yes 3 acres of rainforest in kuranda, I fear the cassowary does look a little bear like!Where the hell do you live at? Rain forrest or something… by the way the bird looks like a SHORTER!![]()
Haha Bravo you are to funny
I'm with ya Girl
Girl Power.......Girl Power........Girl Power..........Girl's Rule & Boy's Drule
![]()
But why are retail selling?So just the usual opportunistic predatory behaviour.Instos accumulating at retails expense
Thanks FF ive given it a bit of thought,and going by the amount of votes,caste,against Peter,Im guessing it was an internal dispute,and they were showing their displeasure in this vote,I,m glad its now been resolvedI suppose it is not unreasonable to say that some accord me credibility.
I cannot say what, how or why I know but all of the theory even my original thoughts at the AGM when I was told what the voting numbers against Peter were, we’re wide of the mark.
No one has come anywhere near what this vote was about but it was a one off.
Not nice but it has all been resolved.
The Board is 100% behind Peter van der Made full stop.
There is no takeover game in play relating to this vote.
If the votes were designed to kick BRN off its perch look to the votes caste on all the other motions.
The party or parties behind those votes could have voted to cause a spill of the entire Board as they were on a second strike.
They did not.
They could have caused concerns about the companies leader and new Board members they did not.
I cannot say anymore.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Don't challenge him to a headbutt competitionYes 3 acres of rainforest in kuranda, I fear the cassowary does look a little bear like!
Why did someone put a $1,000 table to auction and accept $90.00.But why are retail selling?